The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Maybe if more people report them they'll get taken down:

First Time on VW: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... Time-On-VW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Posted by: "Sarah"
Uploaded by: vmbass

Actually a pro model named Briana Lee. Just google "briana lee shower" and you'll see the images from the contri plus a bunch more from the same set. She's got hundreds of links listed on Freeones as well.

FastFive wrote:Maybe if more people report them they'll get taken down:

First Time on VW: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... Time-On-VW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Posted by: "Sarah"
Uploaded by: vmbass

Actually a pro model named Briana Lee. Just google "briana lee shower" and you'll see the images from the contri plus a bunch more from the same set. She's got hundreds of links listed on Freeones as well.

Followup hasn't been so good lately. All you can do is report. And thanks, I don't have a frame of reference to be of any help with that.

Also reported it but I feel it is a waste of time - my 5 last reports have been ignored & the pics remained & votes were still allowed.

If this one stays then I'm giving up reporting...

RalphieC wrote:Also reported it but I feel it is a waste of time - my 5 last reports have been ignored & the pics remained & votes were still allowed.

If this one stays then I'm giving up reporting...

Hi Ralphie,

Nice to see you posting. You can email Leo directly to:

Leo@Voyeurweb.com. I seem to remember that sometimes they leave them upup, but no matter the vote, they are not allowed to win a prize. I like this solution best. The contri remains but no chance of a win to take away from our real amateurs.

More variety and no impact on the real amateurs chances.

The pro has no idea whether they are caught either.

Just a thought.

Anyways I am glad to see you posting again. We post in the COFF Town Hall thread mostly . say hello?

I see the pics are still there - gathering votes & compliments!

I disagree that they should be remain but not win a prize - they should be removed immediately as they used to be.

Some people may only come onto VW ocassionally (as I do now) & just check out the top ranked pics so if someones contri is not in the top 10 say, they dont get viewed.

TOTAL waste of time reporting stolen pics so I'll not be wasting my time in the future

RalphieC wrote:I see the pics are still there - gathering votes & compliments!

I disagree that they should be remain but not win a prize - they should be removed immediately as they used to be.

Some people may only come onto VW ocassionally (as I do now) & just check out the top ranked pics so if someones contri is not in the top 10 say, they dont get viewed.

TOTAL waste of time reporting stolen pics so I'll not be wasting my time in the future

Ralphie,

Did you email Leo?

I agree it is kind of frustrating it does need closer oversight. Nice to see you popping in though. Which Contri do you like the most this month?

More pics that can be found all over the web: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... It-All-Off" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Which is a shame really, cause I loved the set and it's exactly the kind of stuff I love to see at VW.

It's getting ridiculous. Reporting Does Not Work. Somewhere around 1/4 to 1/3 of each day's contri's are ripped from other sites. A low number of posters seem to be turning the site into tumblr style reposts.

Just about everything by coroapassivo2014 and dik_4fun are rips, for example.

Does http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ecife-City look familar? Same three pics, unblurred, are on dozens of sites such as http://bootyoftheday.co/2014/09/22/curv ... blic-nude/ Flavia From Brazil was Anju from India in 2013 and "Anjumann" on gallery-dump in 2010.

That the site not only "reviews" contris before publishing them, but isn't noticing the patterns, and isn't acting on reports really makes me think nobody is at the helm and may even be publishing the fakes themselves just to keep post count up to bring subscribers in. Even in the case where a new poster was flat-out busted for posting pro model pics, they're still up two weeks later. If the reviewers spent even a few minutes looking at the contris, thinking about the patterns, and doing a reverse image search on questionable ones (and, ahem, acting on reports) this site would have a lot fewer fakes.

Another stolen set: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... f-Lingerie" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lots of hits in Google Image... mostly Russian.

You're right Some Dude... it's getting stupid. Between the stolen pics and the absolutely bullshit contributions, it's barely worth logging in any more. :roll:

Several of the posts by that contributor are clearly rips, trivially found on other sites uncropped and years earlier.

Right now, three of the eight "winning" slots in Private Shots this month are clear rips. Two of the nine money-winning slots in RC are rips with another just missing the top ten.

FastFive wrote:Another stolen set: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... f-Lingerie" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lots of hits in Google Image... mostly Russian.

You're right Some Dude... it's getting stupid. Between the stolen pics and the absolutely bullshit contributions, it's barely worth logging in any more. :roll:

Reported his pics many times but not one has ever been removed.

As I mentioned before - the report button is a total waste of time.

The fact that this thread has gone so long without mod intervention and that logs that call out fakers are both regularly deleted from posts and shrugged off by cheaters ("oh, well, I met her and she gave me these cropped pics from her pro porn site") or totally ignored by the site when reported really does make me think the site is either posting them themselves to boost subscriptions or totally dead at the helm.

I'm not sure which is worse.

Please, Please, Create a porn video for GOD SAKE...

Another stolen set - this time in Freestyle

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -The-Beach

Pics are by photographer called Erik Alexander

Cannot belive the number of gullible idiotic comments from some guys - all you have to is see his other contris shown below this one to see they are all different girls he posts, so he is either pro photographer or a pic thief

Are you more sure the idiotic comments aren't robot generated just like the pics are? Both support the site's goals of indicating traffic and implying original content, right? "Millions of active members!" Never mind that the spambots are going "OMG, luv it! moar!" to every single post.

P.S. Include links when reporting pic "liberation". It's the death punch to scammers. I agree this post feels "wrong", but I can't provide linky dinks connecting it to an Erik Alexander with a prior publication date.

Publicly post links to wrongdoing. I've done so for dozens of posts this week...as we enter month end categories to close and actual, real world contributors with personal investment to prepare to be beaten down by copy/pasters.

RalphieC wrote:so he is either pro photographer or a pic thief

The pics are decent... I'd hardly call him a "pro" though. I could easily take shots that good given the right subject. :lol:

Can someone please get "Damon" to think before pushing the approve button? If a "first time" poster looks like it was taken with a ten year old camera and every contri posted by this "first timer" has a different lady, drag and drop a few of the images into a search box.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... klalfhelgf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; makes it super easy to confirm suspicions.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... First-Post" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

October Edition: the #1 winner is an old web shoot. http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ked-Blonde" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is from http://fotozad.ru/foto_devushek/247-ero ... ochki.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and many others.

Off to a great start. :roll:

Weird though... I thought it was fishy too, but a google image search didn't turn anything up for me. Wonder why Chrome let me down. :geek:

Of course, we have dik4fun back with more web retreads, too.

Google's Image Search isn't always the best for shots of this type. Sometimes Bing (!) TinEye, or Yandex will have pages indexed that GIS won't surface. The extension I mentioned makes it easy to test multiples.

As well as all the stolen pics (NONE of which have been removed) - VW now allows porn star pics!!

This contri posted 2nd Oct
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... g-Her-Body

She is a Czech "model" & porn star called Sweet Cat (aka Sandra Sweet) - been doing porn for 5+ yrs!

this site is unreal..... :lol:

RalphieC wrote:As well as all the stolen pics (NONE of which have been removed) - VW now allows porn star pics!!

This contri posted 2nd Oct
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... g-Her-Body

She is a Czech "model" & porn star called Sweet Cat (aka Sandra Sweet) - been doing porn for 5+ yrs!

this site is unreal..... :lol:

It looks like somebody posted some old pictures of her rather than her posting stuff at least that's what it appears to be.

I agree with you RalphieC , somebody needs more oversight and more involvement.

RC, do you know if these stolen pics are actually winning? More than a few have been inside the money spots for the last couple of months.

FastFive wrote:RC, do you know if these stolen pics are actually winning? More than a few have been inside the money spots for the last couple of months.

I don't think they do, but I can't really say for sure. I know I have made a suggestion or two that I've shared with Leo that if it's a nice contri, II would just leave it up but not let it win. Other people strongly feel they should be pulled down immediately. I see both arguments. This might be a good place to debate the issue again, what do you think?

I doubt most viewers vote on most pics. They'll vote on the few that really turn their crank. Would you want YOUR pics to be next to a pro model taken by a real photographer and have been around the internet for years when the home page says "the models displayed on our network are 100% exclusive and can't be found elsewhere on the internet!"? I'd rather funnel the attention (and votes and winnings) to the actual contributors and not the dudes copy/pasting pics from tumblr or cropping logos from pro model pic sites or xossip or desiproject or whatever. (dik4fun keeps deleting my posts where I announce the source of all those posts...)

Given how mad AnnaRae, JenySmith and a few others are about NOT getting their winnings, the silence here about the "winning" contris that are stolen as hell - not to mention the non-winning ones - and the inaction on removal requests from viewers or sometimes even from the original posters, lots of things point to people not getting paid because nobody's home. OTOH, Elise, Adriana, Nicole, and other repeat winners keep coming back, which they probably wouldn't do if they weren't and the site were totally on automated cruise control.

Meanwhile, the October Edition of this thread still has an old web pic as the current #1 winner.

All good points and we'll articulated.

Leo@Voyeurweb.com

Diego@voyeurweb.com

Are the two people who should be able to help.

If you email either, please post a note here saying so, let's keep track.

As for JenySmith Leo swears he paid her, she claims no. I can't reconcile that in my own head. If Leo paid her and she never got the check, then they need a better way to do it. There are several online Web based payment systems. Gotta keep uncle Sam happy of course.

Fight the good fight!

Mail sent. We'll see how it goes.

If Leo swears he paid Jeny, does he have the cancelled check? If not, she has not been paid!

Didn't want to dwell on any one specific case as to highlight the general absenteeism. Yeah, http://forums.voyeurweb.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8346" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; could have had a better subject, but the absolute silence in threads like that and http://forums.voyeurweb.com/viewtopic.p ... 718#p62718" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; look really unprofessional.

I don't know thinker, all I can say is what each has said.

As for the silence in the threads, it speaks for itself. I have a busy month but I'm willing to prod some. It helps if others do too. Fun vibrant forums lead to a comfortable feel, more contri and more subscribers, it's a win win to work to promote the VW community of users.

rockclimber wrote:if it's a nice contri, II would just leave it up but not let it win. Other people strongly feel they should be pulled down immediately. I see both arguments. This might be a good place to debate the issue again, what do you think?

Personally I see no reason to leave it if there's pretty clear evidence that it's just stolen/reprocessed pics. There are enough genuinely hot ladies submitting pics each month that we don't need clutter in there as well. Does having a pro quality shoot do anything to further the site? I don't see how it would. It's been mentioned in the past that a few extra hot ladies will draw traffic... personally, I don't see that. On the other hand, pro shoots could potentially discourage legit contributions, especially if these stolen pro pics are keeping otherwise worthy contris out of the top rankings, and subsequent winnings.

How does a contributor feel if she submits a really nice set of pics of herself and at the end of the month finds herself one or two spots out of the payout rankings because of pics that were clearly ripped off some Russian website from 10 years ago? :roll:

To me, there's no grey area... get rid of them.

This is eye opening to say the least :shock:

And No, Rock, those that are proven as stolen or as professional "porn star" photos should NOT be able to sit by a true amateur contri! That is what this site is supposedly for, anyway....

(also posted under October's Stolen Pic Listing)