Page 1 of 1
What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:44 pm
by RealJustme
A group of intelligence agency officials have identified a little greater than 300 emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server for further review to consider whether they contained classified information, according to a court filing Monday.
Officials have referred 305 documents, or 5 percent of the review sample, to their agencies for further review, State Department lawyers said in the court filing obtained by The Hill.
That could suggest that by the time officials finish reviewing the approximately 30,000 emails that Clinton turned over, some 1,500 will likely be referred to federal agencies to see whether they contained classified material.
Officials have reviewed nearly a quarter of the Clinton emails as of Friday. The State Department is required to file reports to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on its review of the Clinton emails. It is conducting the review because the court ruled the emails had to be regularly released after a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit brought by Vice News.
Reviewers from five different intelligence agencies on July 15 joined the State Department's review of the emails after concerns were raised by inspectors general for the State Department and intelligence community. It's estimated that thousands of man hours will be needed to just sort through the emails, then comes the task of determining potential damages and what actions to take due to the potential that some may be in the hands of hostile governments.
Complicating the matter; adding time and money is that Hillary Clinton chose to comply to the release by providing print outs of the emails, rather than the actual emails as requested. This resulted in hundreds of extra man hours scanning and copying the 30,000 pages of documents so that more than one agency can review them at a time.
“They are conducting a screening process to determine whether there are [intelligence community] equities in the emails, not a full-scale FOIA review of the emails,” State Department lawyers said.
Out of the emails publicly released by the State Department, over 60 were flagged as sensitive for containing information classified mostly at the lowest level of “confidential.” One was classified at the intermediate "secret" level at the request of the FBI.
Another two emails were found by the intelligence inspector to be “top secret.”
The latest figure was first reported by The Washington Times and NBC News.
The Clintons should be footing the bill for all this, not the American tax payers because the Clintons chose to do this.
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 5:58 am
by johnforbes
It was a subtle move, but shows how good both Clintons were as law students.
Delay makes any case more difficult to prosecute.
Then Hillary deleted 32,000 emails, then wiped the server, causing millions to be spent to get and try to retrieve email.
It shows Hillary is very clearly guilty of abusing sensitive info. Otherwise, why do all this?
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 2:57 pm
by sillydaddy
I agree.....Hillary went through a lot of trouble to hide what she was doing...
It couldn't have been just classified government emails.....
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 4:59 pm
by RealJustme
Now Hillary is saying she's confused by the allegations she wiped her server clean.
Hillary shrugs off question about whether she 'wiped' her server clean – 'What, like with a cloth or something?'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... count.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And she want's to run our country?
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:32 am
by johnforbes
Unless the Dept of Justice refuses to pursue this, somebody at the private server company will be asked what instructions they were given on wiping the server.
If the server was professionally wiped, why was that done?
Face it, everybody knows Hillary's intent was to ignore the Freedom of Information Act, to ignore federal rules for email, etc.
Everybody knows a Sec of State constantly deals with sensitive and classified info.
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:00 am
by sillydaddy
A friend that worked for the Defense Department said he was told when hired....
he should consider everything he did at work to be classified until told otherwise.
So for Hillary to say the emails were not classified because they were not marked as such...is bullshit.
That's an explanation for her dumbass supporters!
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:30 am
by RealJustme
for Hillary to say the emails were not classified because they were not marked as such...is bullshit.
Yep
The Senate Intelligence Committee told DailyMail.com shortly after the press conference that Clinton's claim 'is beyond bizarre and entirely nonsensical.'
'She was one of a few dozen people in Obama's administration with the knowledge and experience to decide if something was top secret,' the aide said after a promise of anonymity so he could speak his mind.
'The way you decide if something is classified, when you're the secretary of state, isn't looking for a stamp. It's looking at the contents. This is the worst buck-passing I've seen since Hillary's husband decided there was more than one way to define the word "is".'
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:37 pm
by sillydaddy
And the reporters are finally coming around and asking Hillary the hard questions as seen in the
press conference in Las Vegas. She cut short that press conference and that was a mistake...
The reporters are not going to let up now ......watch her crack !
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:58 pm
by sillydaddy
just realized I made a funny !
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:14 am
by johnforbes
Those two aides, their cell phones were also destroyed.
This was probably a systematic, planned effort to destroy email related to Benghazi and payoffs to the Clinton Foundation.
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:10 am
by RealJustme
Hillary I'm confused as to why a few people are trying to make such as big deal about my emails, it's proof some will do anything to try and find something on me no matter how petty.
Even though it's been pointed out to her that her actions resulted in top secret emails and documents being stored on a private server kept in the bathroom of an apartment where several people without clearances had access to it...Hillary still doesn't understand the concern.
We can't trust her with any more classified information, she doesn't understand the basic concept of securing it.
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:58 am
by sillydaddy
Then why go through so much trouble to destroy the emails?......
No evidence, no firing squad.
She understands perfectly!
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 3:50 pm
by RealJustme
Hillary is on the verge of taking the 5th on her server and private emails, she refused to answer a reporter's question today asking her if she was ever notified that her server had been compromised or hacked.
That should have been a simple yes or no response but she just snapped back that she wasn't going to get into discussions on the server and that she's bent over backwards to be completely transparent including handing the FBI her server, but it's never enough. If she ends up debating Trump and gives that response he'll chew her up and spit her out.
Re: What price are willing to pay for Hillary's convenience?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:14 pm
by johnforbes
Somebody at her server company will testify as to whether he was told to completely erase the server or not.
Why would her aides destroy their cell phones?
Apparently, they also destroyed the texts they sent.
Perhaps the Clinton Foundation evolved into essentially a pay-for-play influence trading outfit?