The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Pamela Geller, the woman named by ISIS as their number one target, says the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security have decline to pursue the threat or provide any type of security. "Our aim was the khanzeer (pig) Pamela Geller and to show her that we don't care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter." It says the militants will target Geller and anyone who hides or hosts her. Another high-profile target of terrorists. The FBI has confirmed the threat came directly from ISIS but explained Geller is a private citizen therefore she'll have to provide her own security and that the FBI will become involved if ISIS follows through on the threat.

So our Government spends billions spying on U.S. citizens and when they're told by terrorists where they will strike next, our government says nothing they can do until after the terrorist strike. What about spending some of that money to put a ring around Geller to catch the terrorists, before they strike? No, they would rather spend resources studying citizens, or could it be Geller is on her own because she's critical of Obama and this is just another example of our government punishing those who don't conform?

You're such a simpleton, Tool.
Sure, what the government should do is tell ISIS what they're going to do to protect her. :lol:

And what we should do is let ISIS, with a few words (which are cheap) decide where our limited assets are going to be deployed so they can bankrupt us first and then strike elsewhere anyway.
You don't have your security broadcast their strategies to criminals, you moron.


This is beyond stupid, even for you, Tool.
Are you even capable of thought? You're about as bright as an amoeba in a dish poked buy a college student.
Seriously, wake up for once in your life.

And what we should do is let ISIS, with a few words (which are cheap) decide where our limited assets are going to be deployed so they can bankrupt us first and then strike elsewhere anyway.

Limited resources? FBI, Homeland Security, NSA, CIA, etc each with multi billion dollar budgets can't watch one single woman after the number 1 terrorist operation in world promises to kill her?

What happened in Texas is a prime example of how worthless our government is under Obama. Two well known terrorists who the FBI and NSA have been "monitoring" for years, tweet their intentions and drive to an event known to be the number one terrorist target and not one federal agent warned the local police or were present at the event. It took a local Texan with nothing but a pistol to stop the two terrorist from another massacre. All while thousands of federal agents sat at their desks monitoring. The same thing happened in Boston, the Feds "monitored" the two known terrorists as they slaughtered Americans. Now you have terrorist exactly who their next target is and the Feds don't have the manpower to waste on that type of intel.

But it isn't just "a single woman" dimwit.

All ISIS would need to do to get you wasting resources is say they have six or ten targets. Then we would need to deploy 20 or 30 agents to 'protect' them when they were just a red herring for the ignorant likes of you.

Besides, as any security knows, you can't protect a person against an attack where the attacker is willing to trade a life for a life.
And I have NO DOUBT that if Obama publicly announced that we were going to put FBI and Homeland on this, you would be here saying he was a fool for telling the enemy what we're doing.

1. Never tell the enemy what you're actually doing for security measures.

2. Never let the enemy decide for you what you are or aren't going to do.

3. You don't know jack shit about what is actually being done. Yet you consider yourself qualified to condemn Obama for what you're completely ignorant of.

Now you're letting ISIS jerk you around and destroying our solidarity against them.
Honestly, stop being such a tool. Especially a tool of ISIS, traitor.

At least as of yesterday, she was saying Homeland "Security" had never even contacted her.

And that's probably because they couldn't care less about her because she is a gadfly who believes in free speech in America.

There are 12 million illegal immigrants wandering around seeking amnesty, so there's no security anyhow.

1. Never tell the enemy what you're actually doing for security measures.

2. Never let the enemy decide for you what you are or aren't going to do.

Obama always tells the enemy what we're doing and he always lets the enemy decide what we are going to do. By saying that aren't going to watch her is telling the enemy a whole hell of a lot.

"Obama always tells the enemy what we're doing..."-RealTool

No, he tells you and other idiots like you (terrorists) what they are apparently gullible enough to believe.

" Limited resources? FBI, Homeland Security, NSA, CIA, etc "-RealTool

And you didn't notice that the only agencies said to not be working on it are the FBI and Homeland.
Gee, do you think maybe one of those other security agencies just might be on it?
Gee, do you think just maybe the FBI and Homeland are on it anyway?


" By saying that aren't going to watch her is telling the enemy a whole hell of a lot."-RealTool

It doesn't tell them anything, dimwit.
You're actually dumb enough to believe that what was given to the public is the whole truth. :lol:
It couldn't possibly be a trap, could it?
You're too clueless to believe, Tool.

You're actually dumb enough to believe that what was given to the public is the whole truth. :lol:
It couldn't possibly be a trap, could it?

Nothing that comes from the Obama Administration is the truth. As far as setting a trap :lol: :lol: :lol: Look at the terrorists attacks in Texas and Boston, those were some traps, they "monitored" the terrorists from their cubicles not passing on any information to the local police and in both cases the local police dealt with the attacks after which the Feds roll in and say, "We were on to them, we've been monitoring them for years."

No we can't depend on the Fed's under Obama, a single Texan with a pistol dealt with two terrorists armed with automatic weapons while the Feds monitored the situation and crowed about how much they knew about the pair.

Pamela Who?

:lol:

"Nothing that comes from the Obama Administration is the truth."-RealSlow

Then why are you getting so upset about it in your first post if it's not true?

Try to keep up.........with yourself. :lol:

Clown acts like he doesn't know who Pamela is. Pamela is the only woman to stand up to Islamic extremist publically therefore liberals hate her and ISIS fears her. She's both of theirs worse nightmare.

RealJustme wrote:Clown acts like he doesn't know who Pamela is. Pamela is the only woman to stand up to Islamic extremist publically therefore liberals hate her and ISIS fears her. She's both of theirs worse nightmare.

Another nutty conservative who uses Hoax News as her soapbox...

LMAO

Got Clown to burn another cookie, it's becoming far to easy.