The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person . . .shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.[36]

That covers both Clintons

[

The program bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666. (B) corruptly solicits or demands for the benefit of any person, or accepts or agrees to accept, anything of value from any person, intending to be influenced or rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving any thing of value of $5,000 or more; or(2) corruptly gives, offers, or agrees to give anything of value to any person, with intent to influence or reward an agent of an organization or of a State, local or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof, in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving anything of value of $5,000 or more; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.(b) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that the organization, government, or agency receives, in any one year period, benefits in excess of $10,000 under a Federal program involving a grant, contract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1, criminalizes the corrupt offer, by mail or in commerce, of anything of value from a public official to a foreign official for an official act to do business.

18 U.S.C. § 203: unauthorized compensation of officials for representing persons before the government (formerly codified at Rev. Stat. § 1782) (enacted 1864)[107]
18 U.S.C. § 204: prohibiting members of Congress from practicing before the United States Court of Claims or the Federal Circuit
18 U.S.C. § 205: officials prosecuting claims against or before the United States (enacted 1962)[107]
18 U.S.C. § 207: "revolving door" statute (enacted 1962)[108]
18 U.S.C. § 208: executive branch conflict of interest (enacted 1962)[107]
18 U.S.C. § 209: executive branch salary supplementation (enacted 1962)[109]
18 U.S.C. § 211: sale of appointive office (formerly codified at 18 U.S.C. § 150, and then 18 U.S.C. § 215) (enacted 1926)[110]
Other18 U.S.C. § 371: conspiracy to defraud the United States (formerly codified at Rev. Stat. § 5440, and then 18 U.S.C. § 88) (enacted 1867)[111]
18 U.S.C. § 610: coercion of political activity
18 U.S.C. § 872: extortion under color of office (enacted 1825)[112]

A short list of Federal crimes the whole Obama Administration should be under investigation for.

Sooner or later, somebody has to call a spade a spade.

It is bribery which was happening in this foundation.

It was bad enough when Bush Sr got a huge sum of money for a post-presidency foreign speech, but Hillary through the foundation was getting bribed as a future president.

If the FBI still exists, it should be seizing the server today.

Let's put all those laws in book form and throw it at the Clintons.....and Obama too.

johnforbes wrote:Sooner or later, somebody has to call a spade a spade.

It is bribery which was happening in this foundation.

It was bad enough when Bush Sr got a huge sum of money for a post-presidency foreign speech, but Hillary through the foundation was getting bribed as a future president.

If the FBI still exists, it should be seizing the server today.

Now the kettle is calling the pot black?

:lol:

Elkin, did you even read what I wrote?

It seem very wrong, to me, for Bush Sr to get big sums of money for foreign speech activity.

But, with the Clintons, it is much worse than selling access to a former politician who knows who to phone in D.C.

Hillary was taking these amounts -- let's be honest and call them bribes -- while Sec of State, and she aspires to become president.

Even The NY Times is reporting on this.

Bill Clinton to the media "I don't use email, I've only sent two emails in my life, both were while I was President."

Hillary Clinton on that same day to media in a different city "The 30,000 emails I delete included emails from my husband and yoga classes are no body's business"

So which one lied? The answer is both!

It's time the law be enforced equally for all, a person's status shouldn't determine if they are exempt from the law.

The case of $500,000 for one of Bill's speech is just one very disturbing example.

Hillary and Bill are married, so that's a $250,000 deposit to her while being Secretary of State, and it is from a foreign entity, and any reasonable person would see it as a payoff.

Forget politics. No American should want this happening.

Any reasonable person would know that any government or business willing to pay $500,000.00 plus private jet and other expenses to hear Bill Clinton crack a few jokes is expecting something in return. Even the Clintons understand that, if not Hillary is stupid. So either Hillary is stupid or she's corrupt, I believe she's both if she thinks we don't get it.

Justme and Forbestardo are spinning like the dual blades on a Chinook helicopter chucking all kinds of shit at the wall and looking to see what can stick.

So what did Hillary do as Secretary of State that would benefit donors?

Evidence?

Anybody?

So what did Hillary do as Secretary of State that would benefit donors?

Are you trying to say her and bubba took all those bribes and didn't deliver?

Elk.....try and keep up !

The latest revelation comes involves a deal which enabled Russia to own about 20% of the uranium production capacity of the United States for a $2.35 million donation to the Clinton Family Foundation.



http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign- ... pacity-jim