The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Yep, Iran would be a fool for not signing an agreement that releases $50 Billion in cash and allows Iran to determine which sites can be inspected for nuclear weapon development and which sites are off limits, while proclaiming they will develop nuclear weapons and death to America and Israel.

So why wouldn't Iran accept Obama's offer and sign the piece of paper?

So what does America get in return? A potential Nobel Peace Prize for Kerry, Obama proclaims he's first President to strike a deal with Iran and a piece of paper.

The State Department on Monday would not rule out giving Iran $50 billion as a so-called "signing bonus" for agreeing to a nuclear deal later this year, according to comments made to journalists following reports that the Obama administration had formulated a plan to release tens of billions of frozen Iranian funds.

Experts have said this multi-billion dollar "signing bonus" option, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, could be the largest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory.

A cash release of $50 billion upon reaching a final nuclear agreement would come in addition to the more than $11 billion in unfrozen assets that Iran will already have received under an interim nuclear accord reached in 2013.

Tool is mystified about why you would release a country's assets when they sign on to an international agreement. :lol:

The real question is, Tool, why would any country sign on to an international agreement if it didn't get them their assets back?

RealTool thinks the only proper solution to this problem is to wipe Iran off the face of the Earth.
It's what Jesus would do, after all.

Tool is mystified about why you would release a country's assets when they sign on to an international agreement.

What mystifies me is why we would sign an agreement that allows Iran a path to nukes and release $50 billion at the same time to help them develop those weapons. The United States should never sign a bad agreement, no matter how bad someone just wants to have an agreement so they can declare a false victory.

It's like the French negotiator said "It's as though the United States is being the spokesperson for Iran in these negotiations"

From what I remember, Dick Cheney was first for Iran, then he was against it.

Now I suppose he's for it again.

Now I suppose Elk is being an idiot.......again.

Halliburton was just fined 233 million for violating Iranian sanctions.

Suppose they want to get a head start in the oil field services business...

Halliburton was just fined 233 million for violating Iranian sanctions.

Obama feels those sanctions should be lifted on Iran, so is he doing it for Halliburton or Iran?

Halliburton was just fined 233 million for violating Iranian sanctions.

Suppose they want to get a head start in the oil field services business... Elk

Then Elk.....you agree the sanctions should remain in place.

Cheney is no longer in power.

Clearly, sanctions should remain in place.

It now appears from the Dept of Energy that Iran is a whole lot closer to nuclear than we thought, and Obama's folks knew that but conveniently didn't mention it.

It now appears from the Dept of Energy that Iran is a whole lot closer to nuclear than we thought, and Obama's folks knew that but conveniently didn't mention it.

The first Obama was aware Iran is only months from have nukes was when he saw it in the news like the rest of us. That's his story and all he has to say on the matter...now where did he put those golf clubs???