The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Mrs Clinton, please tell us why you would all of sudden delete all of your private emails (30,000) off of your own server on your own private email account... after you got the simple request by the State Department to turn over government emails?

OK liberals, please provide some suggested responses for Hillary, sooner or later someone in the media or Congress will think to ask her that very question, she needs your help with a prepared answer.

"AT THIS POINT WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE", is already taken by me.

The fix is already in. From Hussein Obozo through Valarie Jarrett. The Hell Bitch isn't going to run. Leading Donkeyrats are fed up with apologizing and defending indefensible Clinton scandals and violations of law. Turn out the lights, the party's over.

If they try to subpoena the server, then we'll learn the server was -- like Lois Lerner's PC -- suddenly failed and was recycled with no record of where it went to be destroyed.

No doubt there's a ton of classified info in those tens of thousands of emails, and no doubt there's a ton of Benghazi info as to how the Benghazi lies were formulated.

Everyone knows the Clinton foundation for women didn't receive over $3 Billion in donations, including over $15 million from the Saudi's without expectations of favors in return, which we all know they received at tax payer's expense. Those and others are the emails Hillary is afraid of being exposed; everyone already knows Benghazi was a cover up (those that don't are brain dead), so those emails won't tell us anything we don't already know, she would just yawn if those were found.

Carlos

So Hillary, while serving as Secretary of State, was concurrently accepting donations from foreign lands with horrible records on foreign policy and human rights.

And she was hiding her email from the public which paid her salary.

RealJustme wrote:Mrs Clinton, please tell us why you would all of sudden delete all of your private emails (30,000) off of your own server on your own private email account... after you got the simple request by the State Department to turn over government emails?

OK liberals, please provide some suggested responses for Hillary, sooner or later someone in the media or Congress will think to ask her that very question, she needs your help with a prepared answer.

"AT THIS POINT WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE", is already taken by me.

How do you know that 30000 emails were deleted off the server?

I suppose you will provide a link as proof!

:lol:

How do you know that 30000 emails were deleted off the server?

Leave it up to Elk to come up with a response like that from Hillary. Here's how the reporter would respond".

"Well, Mrs. Clinton, we know that because you told us you had 30,000 emails delete, let me refresh your memory by playing this back"

Hillary Clinton, March 9, 2015 "The 30,000 emails that I had deleted were “personal,” I gave the government all the work-related emails"

RealJustme wrote:

How do you know that 30000 emails were deleted off the server?

Leave it up to Elk to come up with a response like that from Hillary. Here's how the reporter would respond".

"Well, Mrs. Clinton, we know that because you told us you had 30,000 emails delete, let me refresh your memory by playing this back"

Hillary Clinton, March 9, 2015 "The 30,000 emails that I had deleted were “personal,” I gave the government all the work-related emails"

OK now you are talking about they were personal emails not work emails.

Do you really want to go through her personal emails? The GOP must be really desperate at this point!

:lol:

Poor Elk......Hillary is a habitual liar, just like Bubba. If you believe they were only "personal" e-mails, then you probably believe her "personal" war stories. :lol: :lol: :lol:

sillydaddy wrote:Poor Elk......Hillary is a habitual liar, just like Bubba. If you believe they were only "personal" e-mails, then you probably believe her "personal" war stories. :lol: :lol: :lol:

"personal war stories"

Bill O'Reilly's got plenty of those!!!

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol:

Elkin, don't be so dishonest.

What the GOP wants is to have a neutral entity, say the IG, go through Hillary's email and ascertain whether it is really personal.

If Hillary were a Repub, liberals would be screaming from the rooftops about Hillary's crazy email tack.

personal war stories"

Bill O'Reilly's got plenty of those!!! ~~ elk

OMG! Elk are you saying you believe Bill like you believe Hillary? :lol:

"Haiti" High....................


What Now America........?

Now, during Benghazi, Hillary was using her private, insecure email to communicate with her staffers who were also on private setups.

What a total breach of security with classified into.

johnforbes wrote:Now, during Benghazi, Hillary was using her private, insecure email to communicate with her staffers who were also on private setups.

What a total breach of security with classified into.

How do you know that classified information was exchanged?

The GOP has admitted that they don't know if Clinton broken any laws.

And now Forbestardo comes up with some pitiful and pathetic lie. How do you know that classified information was exchanged?

Talk about dishonest...

The GOP has admitted that they don't know if Clinton broken any laws.

Wrong, it's clear she broke laws and I'm GOP.

RealJustme wrote:

The GOP has admitted that they don't know if Clinton broken any laws.

Wrong, it's clear she broke laws and I'm GOP.

How about Powell and Rice?

I suppose the GOP will be investigating them as well to determine whether or not their email archival practices are in compliance with all applicable laws...

A Secretary of State deals every day with classified info.

Pretending otherwise is dumb.

johnforbes wrote:A Secretary of State deals every day with classified info.

Pretending otherwise is dumb.

Powell and Rice.

Investigations???

Powell and Rice.

Investigations???

Because they're both black?

To set a personal email server, someone would need to:
Buy a server, which is about the size of a desktop computer.
Buy an operating system to run the server, most likely a version of Microsoft Windows or Linux.
Buy an exchange program to manage the flow of emails (Microsoft Exchange Server is the most common).
Buy a digital certificate to certify that the server has been encrypted.
Buy a domain name (in this case, clintonemail.com).
Install the software.
Install virus and spam filters.
Set up firewalls, including a message transfer agent, an email-specific firewall.
Get a business-class internet connection—a regular consumer connection likely isn’t reliable enough.
Configure the devices using the server, such as Clinton’s BlackBerry.
Plus it cost thousands of dollars.

If you believe Hillary had all this done for "convenience"......then you probably believe her war stories too.

To set up a personal email server, someone would need to:
Hire an IT guy and tell him to set up an email server.
Pay the guy's bill.



Honestly, you've got to be kidding, sillydimwit. :lol:

Hey, compared to dodging sniper fire that would be like a day at the beach.

To set a personal email server, someone would need to:
Buy a server, which is about the size of a desktop computer.
Buy an operating system to run the server, most likely a version of Microsoft Windows or Linux.
Buy an exchange program to manage the flow of emails (Microsoft Exchange Server is the most common).
Buy a digital certificate to certify that the server has been encrypted.
Buy a domain name (in this case, clintonemail.com).
Install the software.
Install virus and spam filters.
Set up firewalls, including a message transfer agent, an email-specific firewall.
Get a business-class internet connection—a regular consumer connection likely isn’t reliable enough.
Configure the devices using the server, such as Clinton’s BlackBerry.
Plus it cost thousands of dollars.

If you believe Hillary had all this done for "convenience"......then you probably believe her war stories too.

Or she could have had both her private and government emails coming to the same device in 5 minutes. Anyone who buys into her lame excuse is brain dead. Even if she is telling the truth she paid for all of the for convenience rather than sending it to the same device (ignore she admitted to carrying three different devices), what kid of dumb ass President would she make? Hillary failed the smell test 30 years ago and she's long over due for some lime to cover the stench.

Notice how Clown is already developing tunnel vision in defending Hillary.......

Really Clown, imagine another 8 years of this!

Read my last post again...I didn't say she had done all that work herself !!

The point is, sillydud, it's not 'inconvenient' to set up a server in the first place, dimwit.

The point is you stupid fuckers always attack someone for the most idiotic things instead of the things for which they should be attacked. It's as stupid as your "birther" shit.
It makes you all look like morons.

And I defended no one, but you're too stupid to read.
Showing you to be a troglodyte does not "defend" the behavior of anyone else.

And by the way, if Cruz is elected, we WILL have another 8 years of this anyway.
None of your ridiculous poster boys will be any different.
You're shitting bricks for the wrong reasons.

The point is, sillydud, it's not 'inconvenient' to set up a server in the first place, dimwit.

The point is only a dumb ass would accept her lame explanation. Then to top it off we learn that both her top aides also used their own private email accounts with their own servers for "convenience" rather than the government email system. They also admitted they deleted thousands of "private" emails at the same time Hillary deleted over 30,000 "private" emails from her server. Only the low information voters won't understand the real reason they didn't use government emails.

So DON"T accept her lame explanation, dimwit.

But you idiots are denying the truth of what she said. It IS more convenient to carry one Blackberry than two.
It IS more convenient not to have to go back and forth on devices and somehow not make a mistake sometimes, just the way you burn cookies by posting under the wrong sock regularly. Eventually you will post a State Department email or ten on your personal email anyway. And she would eventually send one or ten personal emails on the government server. It's unavoidable, a normal human mistake. Then you clowns would be here claiming how something everyone would eventually do shows that other person to be trying to hide something, or that they were using government servers for personal use, or some other stupid shit.

What she said is absolutely true. It IS more convenient to use one device and one email instead of two and everyone who uses those things knows it. It's the same reason Republicans use private servers, but you don't give a fuck about them doing it.
The only real world problem with using a private server arises if it is shown to be breaking the law in some way or that security on the server is less than that of the government server.

Until that is demonstrated in a court of law, all your whining is just partisan propaganda for the dimwitted.

That said, will a private server be abused for the convenience of the owner?
Of course, it's Washington, just as the government servers are regularly abused by employees of the government.
It's a given.
But shut up with the stupid shit and get your guys to actually prove that some law was broken or that some abuse actually took place. Get Clinton for something that is actually wrongdoing instead of stupidly pretending that using one device instead of two isn't more convenient.
Stop with the idiotic spastic ranting of your handlers.

The point is you stupid fuckers always attack someone for the most idiotic things instead of the things for which they should be attacked. ~~ clown

We haven't forgotten about Benghazi, if that's what you mean.

I mean after eight investigations by Congress and others, some by Republicans, and all of them clearing the White House of wrongdoing, then yes, that's a perfect example of conservative stupid shit to be pursuing now.

What will it take to make you dumbfucks just let something go that isn't going to go anywhere no matter how many times you try?
Isn't there anything else you guys could be doing with your time besides just more jacking off?

Here's another way to look at it:

The ONLY argument I've heard for why the White House supposedly lied about Benghazi was because Obama supposedly didn't want America to find out terrorism was not "on the run" in the Middle East because that would have been bad for the election.

In 2012, Obama took 332 Electoral votes, Romney took 206.
To harp on this idiotic argument you would have to convince us that 64 Electors would have changed their votes if they "knew the truth" about Benghazi before they voted.

.....and that's just plain stupid.
It would never have happened.
(Even after taking into account the "winner take all" states, a theoretical swing of one or two percent in the popular vote wouldn't have changed much of anything.)

To harp on this idiotic argument you would have to convince us that 64 Electors would have changed their votes if they "knew the truth" about Benghazi before they voted.

.....and that's just plain stupid.

No what's stupid it that you justify Obama lying to public for votes and try and convince us even if he didn't lie he probably would have still won.

sillydaddy wrote:

The point is you stupid fuckers always attack someone for the most idiotic things instead of the things for which they should be attacked. ~~ clown

We haven't forgotten about Benghazi, if that's what you mean.

One of the Guantanamo inmates released by Bush was ironically involved in the Benghazi attacks. Something that must have been inconveniently forgotten by Bush supporters.

Now the GOP will be investigating Powell's and Rice's email archival processes any minute now...

One of the Guantanamo inmates released by Bush was ironically involved in the Benghazi attacks.

Clown falls back to blaming Bush for Hillary's email deceit. :lol: :lol: :lol:

RealJustme wrote:

One of the Guantanamo inmates released by Bush was ironically involved in the Benghazi attacks.

Clown falls back to blaming Bush for Hillary's email deceit. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And the half-assed hypocrisy of the right wing rears it's goat stinking ass again.

Going after Clinton...again.

Even though Bush released the perps who happened to attack the American outpost. Let's not dredge up the sludge on Bush, but it's OK to spend to millions on Clinton.

That's GOP for all of you home gamers out there...

No matter how hard you try, blaming Bush isn't going excuse Hillary's crimes. As soon as our DOJ is back under the control of the people, Hillary will be prosecuted.

Justme claims that Bush is being blamed, and that's true. But the fact remains that Bush released a prisoner who was associated with the Benghazi attacks. I suppose that never came up in any of Issa's investigations.

But Justme whitewashes history and creates a new chapter of revisionist history and hypocrisy by attempting to divert away from the facts. The GOP would have gone ape shit bananas and set the blogosphere on fire if one of the Gitmo inmates was released by Obama...

A Secretary of State deals every day with classified info. Pretending otherwise is dumb.

Panetta said he told Obama and Hillary right after Benghazi that it was an "attack by terrorists" (quoting him).

The 2012 election was approaching and Obama had been saying terrorism was "on the run" (quoting Obama), so he and Rice and Hillary lied and said it was a video.

One reason Hillary had a private server was to let her delete 30,000 emails, many of which surely related to her Benghazi lies.

Hillary had very good reasons to have her own personal e-mail account....and convenience was the least of them.
She used it in her private dealings with foreign government leaders more than willing to pay for favors.
Of course she didn't deal or meet with them directly....she used her brother!

she's dirty.....

http://truthstreammedia.com/while-clint ... tate-dept/
http://www.allgov.com/news/controversie ... ews=856030
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015 ... il-account

That is the problem.

The number 2 political fellow at DHS was busily getting special favors done for Hillary's brother.

Hillary had to have private email so that she could get donations while Sec of State from state sponsors of terrorism.

$6 Billion spent on contracts can't be accounted for at the State Department during Hillary's queen ship. Hillary's brother is linked to some of those contracts where money was paid but no one knows what work was done. Top that off with during the whole time of Hillary's reign the State Department didn’t have a required Inspector General who's job it is to oversee the State Department. Now why would Hillary operate the State Department without an Inspector General to insure everything was on the up and up? John Kerry restaffed the Inspector General position when he took over and it's that Inspector General who identified Hillary still had government emails and documents in her possession. Upon being told she had to turn the emails back over to the State Department, Hillary picks that time to delete 30,000 private emails from her own private server. Clinton's former top aid Dick Morris explained on CNN last night that private means one thing to the general public and another to a Clinton. Morris explained the Clintons have always consider any email, including government emails they don't want anyone to read as "private" so when it's proven Hillary deleted government emails she will laugh and say "I told you I deleted private emails, those were private government emails"

The GOP admitted that they don't know whether or not Clinton broke any laws. I want to know if Powell or Rice broke any laws. Where are their emails? How were they archived? I want to see the Karl Rove archives? What did he communicate in regards to the attorney generals who were fired? Bush deleted more than 20 million emails. Do you know how long it would have taken to screen all 20 million emails?

Who knows what kind of communications he had with Rove? What did they discuss in regards to the attorney generals? Twenty million is a large number. Bush didn't screen all of those emails. He just did a data dump....

johnforbes wrote:That is the problem.

The number 2 political fellow at DHS was busily getting special favors done for Hillary's brother.

Hillary had to have private email so that she could get donations while Sec of State from state sponsors of terrorism.

Forbestardo spews sewage out of his pie hole again. This has to be the dumbest of the dumbest. Are you such a moronic fool to believe someone would commit a crime and leave a paper trail.

A simple phone call or a conversation on the side would suffice to ask for money.

A simple phone call or a conversation on the side would suffice to ask for money. ~~ Elk

Elk is an idiot......Hillary, unlike Elk, is smart enough to know that cell phone calls have to go through a service provider and they keep records of everything. As for conversations on the side.....Hillary may not want to take the risk of being seen "unofficially" talking to someone from another government.

A simple phone call or a conversation on the side would suffice to ask for money.

Clown you're dumber than I thought if don't think those scums bags don't record every conversation and call they make. It was just learned today that Hillary decided to end the quest to look at her emails, she has officially wiped her server clean of everything, she smugly announced it's now a dead issue, there will be no more discussions about her emails.

Someone in the media should ask Hillary, if she is elected president will she be OK with public employees using their private emails to do government business instead of the government email system. If not, why not!

How'd ya like to have a pup outta one of these fuckers? :lol:

How'd ya like to have a pup outta one of these fuckers?

One thing for sure is they come from a winning gene pool, never in our country's history has both a father and a son accomplished becoming President of the United States based soley upon their competence and proven leadership records.

Obama became President because he is half black, Hillary is hoping to become President because she's a female. If either of them were white males they wouldn't even be considered for city counsel in a small city.

Still waiting on someone in the media to ask Hillary why she would all of sudden delete 30,000 private emails off a server in her own home based upon a request from the State Department to turn over her official mail.

The latest speculation is that there were several e mails to and from her lesbian lovers among the classified State Dept. Business. Wouldn't doubt it.
Now the New York Times has printed a story about another book detailing Hillary's income from foreign sources during her time as Sec. State. Looks like Bribes from countries wishing for favorable treatment.