The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

The D.C. public school system spends $30,000.00 plus per student in k1-k12. Those that are pushed through the system to graduate still have a 50% illiteracy rate and dropout rate and either don't want to work or can't find a job because they have nothing offer, so they turn to government handouts and crime to survive after tax payers have spent around 400K for each of their 12 years of forced liberal indoctrination.

What if we just give each D.C. child 30K a year starting at the age of 5 instead of making them ride a bus to and from holding areas? Imagine a family with 5 kids cost tax payers 150,000.00 per year (just for schooling, food, shelter and Obama phones cost extra). Why not just give that family 200K a year? Skip all the games, I'm betting the crime rate would go down and the 200K a year for that family is far less than what they're costing the tax payers now, not to mention the victims that they stack up over the years.

Same point is valid with Obamacare.

It would have been cheaper, and easier, to simply have American taxpayers pay every medical bill of poor people rather than implement this whale-like mess of Obamacare.

It's good to see johnforbes coming out in support of Obama's original single-payer healthcare insurance plan.
And here I thought he didn't like Obama.

In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.

In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.

Bravo, Forbes! You are now a Xerox V-P for your ability to copy yourself.

In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.

Is it that he can't or won't help it?

He CAN'T help it.

A Scientologist told me you have to talk to people at their "tone" level; that they can't understand anything above their level.

It sounded like crap, but now I see he is right.

After various trials, I finally hit upon the low third grade "tone" level of johnforbes and since then we have been getting along famously.
He lacks the education and life experience to refute a thing I post. All he has in his intellectual arsenal is:

"You are."
"No, you are."
"No, you are."
"I know you are, but what am I?"

johnny's happy as a brain-dead clown drooling on is shoes now.

To be fair, Kafka didn't know trials better than Clownhicker.

Clownhicker lacks the education and life experience to refute a thing I post.

All he has in his intellectual arsenal is nothing because Clownhick has no intellect, not to mention no arsenal.

The sad reality is that nobody ever read one of Clownhick's postings.

All he has in his intellectual arsenal is nothing because Clownhick has no intellect, not to mention no arsenal.

Clown just likes to get spanked, the other liberals have taken to the hills, conservatives own this board.

^^^^And RealTool demonstrates some of his 7th grade tool "tone" level--- self-congratulatory victories, unquestioning obedience to his handlers, and made up lies to support his unsupportable propaganda.

I will make a cashout offer to Clownhicker.

If he will stop posting here, I will pay Clownhicker a wage of one dollar per hour for his landscaping duties.

I am presently giving him 80 cents per hour. He isn't worth that, of course, but I'm generous.

A dollar an hour up from 80cents......is this country great or what !

johnforbes is staggeringly stupid.

Clownhick has staggered many times.

I will make a cashout offer to Clownhicker.

If he will stop posting here, I will pay Clownhicker a wage of one dollar per hour for his landscaping duties.

I am presently giving him 80 cents per hour. He isn't worth that, of course, but I'm generous.

johnforbes is Wee Todd Id.

Sofa King Wee Todd Id.

You can go to the Vasa Museum in Sweden, as I recently did, and not find anything more sunken than Clownhicker's sallow face.

^^^^^Sofa King Wee Todd Id

You can go to the Vasa Museum in Sweden, as I recently did, and not find anything more sunken than Clownhicker's sallow face.

^^^^^Sofa King Wee Todd Id

Sofa King Wee Todd Id

???

There goes Clown again, trying to match wits with John and only looking silly :lol:

If you had the intelligence to understand it, RealTool, you would realize you just made a fool of yourself. :lol:

Sofa King Wee Todd Id bu tee

The vast majority of welfare recipients are white. Surely those black kids in DC can't compare to all of the whites who come to depend on handouts?

Welfare is a bad thing regardless of race.

It destroys initiative and drive.

Look at the tens of thousands of illegal immigrant kids recently added to the 12 million illegals here.

All those kids will spend decades supported by various American welfare programs courtesy of the overtaxed American taxpayer.

The vast majority of welfare recipients are white.

Let me correct that for you,the vast majority of blacks are welfare recipients. We all know the reason why, liberals don't feel they're capable of caring for themselves so they treat them like pets.

Blacks that break their liberal chains do quite well for themselves.

That's just not true, the majority of blacks are not on welfare.

In FY 2010, 31.8% of TANF families were white, 31.9% were African-American, and 30.0% were Hispanic.[28]

Now remember that whites are a much larger percentage of the population. So again the vast majority of people receiving welfare are white. Maybe you should spend your day wringing your hands about all those lazy white people?

Benny, your own posts shows that blacks received 31.9% of the social benefits although they're only 13% of the population.

Pew research also shows Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to be on food stamps.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/20 ... ecipients/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The politics and demographics of food stamp recipients

.
Democrats are about twice as likely as Republicans to have received food stamps at some point in their lives—a participation gap that echoes the deep partisan divide in the U.S. House of Representatives, which on Thursday produced a farm bill that did not include funding for the food stamp program.

Overall, a Pew Research Center survey conducted late last year found that about one-in-five Americans (18%) has participated in the food stamp program, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. About a quarter (26%) lives in a household with a current or former food stamp recipient.

Of these, about one-in-five (22%) of Democrats say they had received food stamps compared with 10% of Republicans. About 17% of political independents say they have received food stamps.

The share of food stamp beneficiaries swells even further when respondents are asked if someone else living in their household had ever received food stamps. According to the survey, about three in ten Democrats (31%) and about half as many Republicans (17%) say they or someone in their household has benefitted from the food stamp program.

But when the political lens shifts from partisanship to ideology, the participation gap vanishes. Self-described political conservatives were no more likely than liberals or moderates to have received food stamps (17% for each group), according to the survey.

Beyond politics, equally large or larger gaps emerge in the participation rates of many core social and demographic groups. For example, women were about twice as likely as men (23% vs. 12%) to have received food stamps at some point in their lives. Blacks are about twice as likely as whites to have used this benefit during their lives (31% vs. 15%). Among Hispanics, about 22% say they have collected food stamps.