Page 1 of 1
The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:38 am
by Intrepid
It was a predictable 5-4 decision this time with the bedwetters on the left dissenting, but Hobby Lobby won and the Dear Leader lost.
Boo-fucking-hoo.
At least Roberts managed to pull his head out of his ass this time.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:41 am
by Intrepid
Twice yesterday, actually. They also ruled that employees cannot be forced to pay union dues.
President Obama suffered two final defeats in the Supreme Court on Monday, capping a 2013-2014 term in which the justices delivered several judicial hits to the White House while taking a firm stand against the unchecked power of the state.
The administration’s losses on Obamacare rules and compulsory union dues served as a rebuke on the Supreme Court’s final day after months of judicial decisions to rein in big government on issues such as snooping without a warrant, campaign finance restrictions and Mr. Obama’s recess appointment powers.
Just as damning was the way the court ruled in some of those cases. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. corralled unanimous votes on privacy and recess appointments — cases that dealt stinging defeats to Mr. Obama, himself a lawyer and former lecturer on constitutional law.
In the more than five years that Mr. Obama has been in office, the court has rejected the government’s argument with a 9-0 decision 20 times.During the eight years each in the administrations of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, the government lost on unanimous votes 15 times and 23 times, respectively. That puts the Obama administration on pace to greatly exceed recent predecessors in terms of judicial losses.
“The importance of the unanimous cases is that you can’t say, ‘Well, there are five Republican appointees on the court and four Democrats.’ These cases where they haven’t gotten the votes of either of the two Obama nominees means the arguments being presented by the Justice Department to the court are just out of left field,” said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.
Mr. Obama appointed Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor as justices.
Although Monday’s decisions were not unanimous, congressional Republicans and other critics of Mr. Obama saw the rulings as evidence that the Roberts court is acting as something of a final line of defense against a president who brags about his use of executive power to bypass Congress and impose his liberal agenda on the American people.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:02 am
by Clownkicker
"They also ruled that employees cannot be forced to pay union dues."-Insipid
No, they didn't.
You're parading your smug ignorance again.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:16 am
by johnforbes
Sotomayor was never criticized by the Left for her standard speech claims that her gender and ethnicity made her "wise."
The "wise Latina" Sotomayor is dutifully serving as a radical leftist.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:20 am
by Clownkicker
Captain Ahab himself never observed, despite all his years at sea, as much blubber as johnforbes observes when taking a shower.
johnforbes' belly is so large that he hasn't even seen his feet since 1957.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:24 pm
by johnforbes
Captain Ahab himself never observed, despite all his years at sea, as much blubber as Clownhicker observes when taking a shower.
Clownhicker's belly is so large that he hasn't even seen his feet since 1957.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:57 pm
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is so fat, when he sits around the house, he sits A R O U N D the house.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:50 pm
by johnforbes
Clownhicker put the "add" in "adipose."
Captain Ahab himself never observed, despite all his years at sea, as much blubber as Clownhicker observes when taking a shower.
Clownhicker's belly is so large that he hasn't even seen his feet since 1957.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:05 pm
by Clownkicker
"His Lordship put the "add" in "adipose."
There is no "add" in adipose, you stupid fuck.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:33 pm
by RealJustme
There is no "add" in adipose, you stupid fuck.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Clown, once again, John proved why you shouldn't try and match wits with him.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:13 pm
by Clownkicker
I don't "try and match wits" with someone who has none, moron.
By the way, show us the "add" in adipose, you stupid tool.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:42 am
by Intrepid
Lucky, hit the bong AFTER your morning visit to VW.
The administration’s losses on Obamacare rules and compulsory union dues served as a rebuke on the Supreme Court’s final day after months of judicial decisions to rein in big government on issues such as snooping without a warrant, campaign finance restrictions and Mr. Obama’s recess appointment powers.
Now, what part of "Compulsory union dues" does your drug ravaged mind not understand?
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:01 am
by Clownkicker
What part of "No, they didn't." does your drug-ravaged mind not understand?
Why would you return to parade your smug ignorance again after I just told you that is what you are doing?
Jeezus, Insipid, at least have the brains to read up on the decision after I told you that wasn't what the Supreme Court said.
Just because an article in a newspaper makes a statement doesn't mean you are smart enough to understand what that statement means. Of course, that would require some critical thinking which you reactionaries eschew.
Again, the Supreme Court didn't say that "employees cannot be forced to pay union dues."
Now go do your homework before you start jabbering foolishness about it some more.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:53 am
by johnforbes
Even when she was young, and before she had breast implants, Lorrie Morgan could not explain all the parts of "No" which Clownhicker could not understand.
Clownhick wouldn't know a cert from a Serta, nor would he recall Joey Heatherton doing TV ads for Serta.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:43 pm
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is stupid.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:28 am
by johnforbes
Even when she was young, and before she had breast implants, Lorrie Morgan could not explain all the parts of "No" which Clownhicker could not understand.
Clownhick wouldn't know a cert from a Serta, nor would he recall Joey Heatherton doing TV ads for Serta.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:14 am
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is incredibly stupid.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:00 am
by johnforbes
Even the sinuous Joey Heatherton, her taut, tan physique glistening in the afternoon, did not writhe as much as Clownhicker evading simple logic.
Even when she was young, and before she had breast implants, Lorrie Morgan could not explain all the parts of "No" which Clownhicker could not understand.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:07 am
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is unimaginably stupid.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:58 am
by johnforbes
Diana Ross was once a Supreme, but that takes nothing away from the fact of Clownhicker's raw stupidity.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:40 pm
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is profoundly stupid.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:37 pm
by Grog
Some profoundly profound and insightful insights expressed in highly elevated discourse.
The only thing it's missing is a couple "pootie heads" and maybe something about someone's mother's choice in government issued footwear.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:52 pm
by johnforbes
Grog's mater did indeed wear combat boots.
Even the sinuous Joey Heatherton, her taut, tan physique glistening in the afternoon, did not writhe as much as Clownhicker evading simple logic.
Even when she was young, and before she had breast implants, Lorrie Morgan could not explain all the parts of "No" which Clownhicker could not understand.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:11 pm
by Grog
As is evidenced by "his" Joey Heatherton reference, Forbes is certain "Laugh-In" is cutting edge topical hilarity.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:31 pm
by johnforbes
Why yes, I am tuned into popular culture.
For example, I'm aware of the music of Garnet Mimms and Wilson Pickett and Billy Joe Royal and a host of other very modern singers.
Heck, I even have an electric typewriter.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:49 pm
by Grog
See? Forbes checks in with the Smothers Brothers to see what's going down.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:48 am
by johnforbes
Note: Ask somebody with a computer to Google Goldie Hawn bikini pics.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 5:21 am
by Intrepid
From the liberal National Journal:
The Harris decision is more than just another instance of union setbacks, though. It's also yet another win for conservatives who have been trying to use the First Amendment to push their causes.
From campaign finance law (Citizens United) to the Affordable Care Act's contraception mandate (Hobby Lobby), the First Amendment has become the GOP's ironclad defense against government regulations. The Harris v. Quinn ruling just added another plate to the GOP's armor.
They are pissed off so that means the decision is good for America. Note that they are upset over using the First Amendment to defeat their agenda. Isn't it always the rabid, foaming at the mouth libtards that are always going on about how important the First Amendment is to their agenda? Now they are having second thoughts. What the libtards never realize it that the Bill of Rights isn't a buffet. They can't pick and choose the parts they approve of.
The Harris decision was a stick in the eye for the Dear Leader's pet union SEIU.
So, yes, the Dear Leader WAS most defiantly bitch slapped. Anything that puts roadblocks in the socialist agenda of the Dear Leader is good for America.
Now Lucky, go hit your bong and seek your mellow. You must be terribly cranky after the 4th of July celebrations of our nations liberty, which you and your diseased and degenerate ilk have been seeking to destroy for years now. Hopefully, as in the Harris decision, you will suffer many more setbacks in the months and years to come.
Perhaps even some of your beloved White Lady would be in order hmmm?
Cook up a soup ladle full this time junkie and get it over with.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:36 am
by Clownkicker
^^^^^^^What is it about these windbag reactionaries that they can't just say 'You were right, the Court didn't say "...that employees cannot be forced to pay union dues."'?
No, they have to yammer on and on and bore us all and try to pretend they were correct all along even though they now know they were wrong.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:57 am
by johnforbes
Diana Ross never sported an afro wider than Clownhicker's ignorance.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:02 am
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is dumb.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 10:11 am
by RealJustme
They are pissed off so that means the decision is good for America. Note that they are upset over using the First Amendment to defeat their agenda.
Sad but even Obama has said the Constitution gets in the way of what he wants to do but has promised he won't let it stop him from doing what "he" feels is right. Obama is open about it.
Re: The Supremes bitch slap the Dear Leader again
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:08 am
by Intrepid
You know that when Lucky posts blather like that he can come up with no credible response.
Right in your 10 ring you drug addled, smoke brain bitch.
The interesting thing will be the next attempt (you just KNOW there will be one) by the Dear Leader to circumvent the Constitution, and what the response will be. How many more Donkey-Rats thinking ahead to 2016 will abandon the sinking good ship Hussein M'bongo?