Page 1 of 1
Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 4:50 pm
by sillydaddy
Senate Intelligence Committee concludes that the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi could have been prevented if U.S. officials listened to warnings.
Obama watched the attack on live video feed. The only presidential decision he made that night was to go back to bed.
He later refer to the death of the ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans as a "bump on the road".
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 5:10 pm
by RealJustme
"WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE"
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 5:33 pm
by RealJustme
RealJustme wrote:The Democrat's great hope for President in 2016 would have only one comment "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?"
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:34 pm
by johnforbes
Panetta told Obama the same day that it was a terrorist attack.
So Obama and Hillary and Rice lied about a video.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:37 am
by divermouse
so bush lied about iraq
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:54 am
by johnforbes
One mistake, even if that transpired, does not excuse another.
Bush is no longer president; Obama is.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:11 am
by divermouse
"even if".... like you don't know.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:26 am
by johnforbes
Diver, your "logic" is childish.
The fact that Hitler was bad doesn't serve to excuse other, subsequent problems in history.
Obama has been president 5 years, and his record -- however dismal -- is there for us to see and criticize.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:43 am
by divermouse
no shit john.. .that's the point. look i in no way want to make lite of Benghazi, people died. but you guys keep raking it just for the political benefit of upcoming elections. mistakes made, well dugh. kinda late now.. so what do you have other that impeach obama your tribe started this crap with brithers and muslim BS before he was sworn in. your tribe continues to want to cut taxes. this kind of protection cost money and we all have to pay... (your tribe "well everyone but ME)... kind of gets old. what is your real solution's remove all operatives all embassy's. these guys were more than just small time paper pushers they knew the risks they were there for real reasons besides a holiday. my bet is alot of embassy's and outposts are direly under-staffed / protected, this one got hit. it's a rough and tumble world out there. hell lit's rough in downtown pick large city dejoure but again no taxes leaves the police short.. so what is it you really want beside obamas head. which brings me to my point by deafult... did you want bushes head, did you cry for that when, NO YOU DID NOT. justice for all, not just party convenience.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:46 am
by RealJustme
so bush lied about iraq
What lie did Bush tell? President Clinton is the first President to declare Iraq had WMD back upon by a long list of Democrats before Bush even became President. Those same Democrats voted for war based upon the proof provided by President Clinton, Bush just did what the Congress directed and he did it well.
There area long list of proven lies that Obama has told
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:00 am
by divermouse
real that's so fucking absurd where do I start… here’s some basic facts.
Regan gave iraq the weapons
Clinton tried to bomb the afganistan camps to take osama the sheep fucker out.. republicans went nuts
Clinton pointed out sadams a nut job
Clinton got a blowjob
Clinton smart mutherfucker
Bush ignored clark
Bush said chemical manufacturing / yellow cake / aluminum tubes / iraq directly involved in 9-11 / tax cuts will create jobs /
Bush is an idiot
10 downing street memo
partial fact
bush did what congress directed, at his request to be ready should the need arise.. bush took the authorization to and ran wihth it as a decliration to act now
not facts
proof provided by clinton
bush did it well
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 8:03 am
by johnforbes
What did the Washington Post rake up Watergate?
First, because Nixon lied, but partly because Nixon was Republican.
Today, the Washington Post and the media have absolutely no interest in Obama's scandals -- his lies about the IRS, Benghazi, etc.
Why? Because they favor Obama's agenda.
Journalism no longer exists.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:26 pm
by sillydaddy
Clinton never tried to take out Bin Laden. The Sudanese approached Clinton and asked for aid in doing away with terrorism in their country, in return they provided detail intel on Bin Laden and his terrorist group which at that time included the names and locations of those that flew the planes on 9/11. Clinton ignored the information, instead preferred to concentrate on Saddam.
Bush ignored Clarke, also preferring to go after Saddam because what Clarke was telling him about Bin Laden sounded unbelievable and the intel he was getting from the CIA did not point to Bin Laden....in the end making both Clinton and Bush idiots. But I'm still not clear as to what Bush lied about.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:19 pm
by divermouse
Clinton never tried to take out Bin Laden.. BULLSHIT mr don't remember the republicans sniveling about the rocket attacks into the training camps… which missed and again all the finger pointing of his incompetence for missing AFTER the fact.
You don’t see the lies… now that’s just laughable
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 3:25 pm
by sillydaddy
Clinton was criticized for ordering those attacks to take attention away from the Monica mess. He wasn't going after Bin Laden...........he was trying to save his own ass !
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 6:14 pm
by RealJustme
Senate Intelligence Committee concludes that the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi could have been prevented if U.S. officials listened to warnings.
Imagine the very official who allowed it to happen wants to be President to protect us all in 2016.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 6:21 pm
by Grog
Imagine that W. was reelected after he allowed the wholly preventable 9/11, which in terms of body count and economic destruction, was far, far, far worse.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:13 pm
by RealJustme
Imagine that W. was reelected after he allowed the wholly preventable 9/11, which in terms of body count and economic destruction, was far, far, far worse.
You ignore the planning and preparation happened under President Clinton, he allowed them into the Country and he ignored the warnings about the attackers by his own intelligence, to Clinton the biggest threat to America was Iraq who he claimed had WMD and was preparing to use them. Obama was naïve in trusting a Clinton when he took over.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:22 pm
by Grog
Who was warned a month before 9/11 that "bin laden determined to attack inside U.S.?" Wasn't Clinton.
If you are going to hold Hillary to 20/20 hindsight vision, then you must apply it to W. and President Cheney as well.
I mean, if you truly want to be Fair, Balanced and Unafraid.
Roger A.
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:56 pm
by elklindo69
RealJustme wrote:Imagine that W. was reelected after he allowed the wholly preventable 9/11, which in terms of body count and economic destruction, was far, far, far worse.
You ignore the planning and preparation happened under President Clinton, he allowed them into the Country and he ignored the warnings about the attackers by his own intelligence, to Clinton the biggest threat to America was Iraq who he claimed had WMD and was preparing to use them. Obama was naïve in trusting a Clinton when he took over.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Senate committee: Benghazi attacks were preventable
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:02 pm
by sillydaddy
Bush ignored Clarke, also preferring to go after Saddam because what Clarke was telling him about Bin Laden sounded unbelievable and the intel he was getting from the CIA did not point to Bin Laden....in the end making both Clinton and Bush idiots. ~~~ from my own previous post
Fair, Balanced and Unafraid