The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Our elected leaders as a whole are disgracing the United States to appease their egos.

Syria is a no brainer, we help the rebels over throw Assad, "we" lose in the long run. For our politicians on both sides It's all about instant gratification, re-election, smoke and mirrors and for Obama it about his ego. I once considered Ron Paul unstable with his rants and warning of our politicians...now I'm thinking he is spot on.

Time to flush the toilet and start over.

Carlos

Kucinich, a very dependable liberal, is very much against striking Syria.

In essence, he says, the U.S. would be serving as the air corps of Al Qaeda.

Like many another bad country, Syria is probably best ruled by a strong dictator lest some of the worse components there take over.

I'm ashamed of Obama for getting us into this mess. He should have kept his mouth shut. You'd think he would have learned from Bush's, "Bring It On" statement and not make the same mistake ! What an idiot !

I'm ashamed of Obama for getting us into this mess. He should have kept his mouth shut. You'd think he would have learned from Bush's, "Bring It On" statement and not make the same mistake ! What an idiot !

Obama has already explained, he didn't draw that red line Americans and Congress did. Makes one wonder why he doesn't consider himself an American?

"The Associated Press ran a skeptical piece Sunday about the Obama administration's public case for military intervention in Syria in response to a reported Aug. 21 chemical attack.

The AP's Zeina Karam and Kimberly Dozier wrote that "the U.S. government insists it has the intelligence to prove it, but the public has yet to see a single piece of concrete evidence produced by U.S. intelligence -- no satellite imagery, no transcripts of Syrian military communications -- connecting the government of President Bashar Assad to the alleged chemical weapons attack last month that killed hundreds of people."

The Obama administration has released videos to make its case, but the AP noted that it's requests for additional evidence the government claims to possess have been denied"

johnforbes wrote:"The Associated Press ran a skeptical piece Sunday about the Obama administration's public case for military intervention in Syria in response to a reported Aug. 21 chemical attack.

The AP's Zeina Karam and Kimberly Dozier wrote that "the U.S. government insists it has the intelligence to prove it, but the public has yet to see a single piece of concrete evidence produced by U.S. intelligence -- no satellite imagery, no transcripts of Syrian military communications -- connecting the government of President Bashar Assad to the alleged chemical weapons attack last month that killed hundreds of people."

The Obama administration has released videos to make its case, but the AP noted that it's requests for additional evidence the government claims to possess have been denied"

So you want the government to divulge intelligence gathering secrets that will endanger the lives of secret US agents working undercover???

Be serious.

Go back, read the quoted material, and you'll be able to grasp its import.

So you want the government to divulge intelligence gathering secrets that will endanger the lives of secret US agents working undercover???

Obama also said he had proof Bengazi wasn't a terrorist attack. He even had Hillary make a video apologizing to the "protestors" who killed our people. This is the same guy who denies drawing a red line and you want to go war based upon nothing but his word?

^^^^^Wow, after following W. Bush on his word, like a dog, I guess RealJustme finally learned his lesson.

Good for you, clown.

Saying "Bush" does not erase the current rein of Politicians responsibilities.

Pelosi was booed this weekend by ultra left liberals in California when during a pitch for attacking Syria she tried to deflect by bringing up "Bush". It's been 5 years since Bush has been out of office, no one is buying any more.