Page 1 of 2
What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:12 am
by BilboBagend
Malignantly wrong as always.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:24 am
by RealJustme
Don't worry the Obama Administration, Jesse Jackson and the media haven't given up on riots yet!
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:48 am
by sillydaddy
The natives are restless indeed, but now they call them demonstrations. Unlike the the lawless days of Watts, they know the white folk are armed and will not hesitate to shoot.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:34 pm
by elklindo69
They had to call in the army to stop the LA riots...
DUH
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:44 pm
by RealJustme
They had to call in the army to stop the LA riots...
That's before a short Hispanic guy put the fear of God into them. People fight back now and they know it.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 3:50 pm
by BilboBagend
Like every post by these false conservatives. All bullshit. All malice. Mostly bigotry. All titall false made up lies.
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
That is the total sum of all their posts. Justupid, the faux, liar leroy, et al.
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf, wolf!!!!!
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 4:18 pm
by RealJustme
I think it's apparent who the wolfer is. :lol:
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:00 am
by BilboBagend
Yes,it's extremely clear.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:55 am
by PainfulTruth
Been paying attention to the news Dildo? Your riots have arrived along with that idiot race baiting poverty pimp Al Sharpton.
Idiot.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:58 am
by PainfulTruth
Some headlines on Drudge right now:
Baltimore Witness: Group of Blacks Beat Hispanic Man, Yelling 'This Is For Trayvon'...
White jogger beaten...
Protesters storm WALMART...
PA BUSINESS GRAFFITIED WITH 'KILL ZIMMERMAN,' SET ON FIRE...
VIDEO: CBS Reporter, Photographer Attacked...
LAPD vows crackdown...
Zimmerman's Parents in Hiding from 'Enormous Amount of Death Threats'...
Chicago Church Marquee: 'It Is Safe To Kill BLACK PEOPLE In Amerikkka'...
Verdict unleashed pent up rage...
Any other idiotic assertions Dildo>
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:38 am
by Grog
Drudge? Why not just go to the most Fair and Balanced source of all?
I was just flipping by Fox a few minutes ago and they were doing a completely straight-faced segment on how terrorists could hijack your car's computer and make you crash.
Good stuff.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:05 pm
by RealJustme
I was just flipping by Fox a few minutes ago
Grog that would have disqualified you to be on the jury of the Zimmerman trial, the prosecution rejected anyone who watched FOX news, even blacks.
CCN- One of the only black potential jurors being considered was nixed by the prosecution because he admitted he sometimes watched Fox news. On CNN today, it was revealed that it was the prosecution that ensured the jury would be composed primarily of white women. Why? One of the only black potential jurors being considered was nixed by the prosecution because he sometimes watched Fox News to try and balance what other channels were reporting.
“Do Trayvon Martin’s parents, you think, I mean, when they look at the jury makeup and they look at the decision that jury came to, do they say, ‘Why didn’t we have an African-American on the jury? Why did we have six white women?’” asked CNN anchor Carol Costello on Tuesday.
CNN legal analyst Mark Nejame launched into a lengthy reply identifying the low percentage go black residents of Seminole County which justified the monochromatic makeup of the jury pool.
“Although, if I remember correctly one of the prosecutors struck a black, a potential black juror from the jury,” Costello recalled.
“Yeah, he was black but he also — I was told — he was also a Fox News watcher,” replied Political Director for Russell Simmons’ website TheGlobalGrind.com, Michael Skolnick. “So that was, you know, problematic for the prosecution.”
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:14 pm
by Grog
Well since your Teamail C&P is from CCN it's veracity is suspect.
Beyond that, unlike most Fox viewers, I know they are the opposite of Fair and Balanced. So, yes, if your Teamail is factual, I think that regular Fox viewers should be banned from jury duty and most other activities that require an I.Q. higher than Forrest Gump's.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 pm
by RealJustme
Too late Grog, you admitted to watching FOX and we all know why you did it...you wanted to find out what the hell was really going on, you're curiosity overrode your liberal bias. Good for you dude!
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:00 pm
by BilboBagend
Yes, LA has had some trouble.
Still, nothing compared to the dishonest, malice filled, prejudiced predictions of liars who in fact knew nothing more than their malice. Such liars still get a coin toss correct 50% of the time, no matter how much malice and authority they fake.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:16 pm
by Grog
Exactly, JustFreedme. One can obtain the actual truth by watching Fox and then going with the opposite of whatever they are "reporting."
They don't report actual news; they report what they know their audience wants to hear. That's why they are the "most trusted" by imbeciles and the "least trusted" by non-imbeciles.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:38 pm
by RealJustme
Grog, you've admitted to watching FOX news, get over it. I can bet you that if the United States came under Nuclear attack even blacks wouldn't go to MSNBC to find out what's happening, everyone would go to FOX...because at that point they want REAL news, not to be told what they want to hear.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:50 pm
by elklindo69
RealJustme wrote:Grog, you've admitted to watching FOX news, get over it. I can bet you that if the United States came under Nuclear attack even blacks wouldn't go to MSNBC to find out what's happening, everyone would go to FOX...because at that point they want REAL news, not to be told what they want to hear.
Maybe that's why the Bush administration hired Tony Snow...
:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 3:02 pm
by RealJustme
Maybe that's why the Bush administration hired Tony Snow
Elk that makes no sense at all, care to explain what you're trying to say?
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:15 pm
by BilboBagend
Sorry, the opposite Faux News theory just doesn't work. There is simply too much pure fictional delusion. The only thing that you CAN depend on from faux news is that it is most probably fictional, non-cohesive, shallow, malice filled and just well enough put together to fool the completely stupid who will never observe the conflicting lies for what they are.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:44 pm
by brandon
Because most people believe in their right to defend themselves.
Maybe the media and the race hustlers just aren't so believable anymore? This may be a lesson for them.
Maybe they should change their tack to blaming the new oppressors of black America, ....Hispanics.
Viva la Raza!

Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:19 pm
by BilboBagend
Still, it's the defense against the person being stalked defending themselves argument.
A bit convoluted and disingenuous.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:59 pm
by elklindo69
BilboBagend wrote:Still, it's the defense against the person being stalked defending themselves argument.
A bit convoluted and disingenuous.
It's all a moot point. Rachel Jenteal and Juror B37 are both imbeciles. And you just can't reason with stupid...
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:59 am
by johnforbes
Apparently, there was about a 4-minute gap where Trayvon was about 20 seconds from his house.
But he obviously didn't go there and instead went looking for Zim, who was supposedly going back to his vehicle.
But let's underscore the word "apparently." All along, it has been a shame that some security video didn't capture the events and show us.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:30 am
by RealJustme
But let's underscore the word "apparently." All along, it has been a shame that some security video didn't capture the events and show us.
Maybe the prosecutor still has the video in evidence and just forgot to present it a trial. The prosecutor is the real criminal in this case.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 11:57 am
by BilboBagend
Apparently, the faux believes stories/speculations that the defense attorney simply makes up.
There is one born every minute. The key, tell them what they want to hear.
BTW: faux, I have a letter here that says you just inherited about $16M. Just send me a check for $10,000.00 for processing.
ROFLMAO
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 12:34 pm
by RealJustme
Apparently, the faux believes stories/speculations that the defense attorney simply makes up.
Holder and Angela Corey may have the legal system in Florida under their strict control so they can break any law they want, but just wait until the civil trials start and everything comes out. Corey's 2 million dollar pension plan and everything she's earned through manipulation of the system will belong to Zimmerman. Her former IT Director, the former Stanford Chief of Police and 3 detectives have all come out with information that Corey lied and concealed evidence in violation of Zimmerman's and several other peoples' civil rights. You know Corey isn't sleeping well at night knowing what's coming.

Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:50 pm
by johnforbes
It would have taken Trayvon about 20 seconds to walk home.
He didn't.
Instead, there was a four-minute gap.
According to CBS, and Jeantel, it was Trayvon who initiated contact by saying "What are you following me for?"
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:20 pm
by BilboBagend
How dare that little Mofo ask such a question of his stalker.
ROFLMAO
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:41 pm
by johnforbes
But, as the evidence showed, Trayvon didn't just ask a question.
Zim's injuries told the jury, and the forensic expert, what transpired.
Trayvon was a punk, but there are many of them -- white, black, green, no matter -- and that doesn't mean they should be shot.
But it is very clear that this wasn't a civil rights case at all. Zim was curious, and followed, a fellow in a hooded sweatshirt walking in the rain on a dark night.
Obama, like Sharpton, is trying to whip this up into some sort of Rosa Parks moment.
Instead, it was -- like most cases -- a mess.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:23 am
by BilboBagend
Yep,
A man stalked and tracked down a person walking home. That person turned and defended themselves, "stood his ground", a brief fight ensued, a man shot and killed the person walking home.
That is as much facts as anyone knows.
Without "stand your ground" laws the murderer more than likely would have been convicted.
That is all we know.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 6:23 am
by BilboBagend
Still
No riots as the malignant bigoted liars had predicted.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:53 pm
by RealJustme
Still
No riots as the malignant bigoted liars had predicted.
Tell that to the thousands of victims across the United States who were either attacked or had their property destroyed, that was before Obama teamed up with Jesse Jackson and other agitators. Obama is the first leader ever to call on people to take to the streets to protest a Government he is in charge of, it's the only Obama knows how to do.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:13 am
by BilboBagend
As always. justupid delusional distortions.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:47 am
by RealJustme
Obama is stirring this up to distract from real issues that are exposing Obama's lack of leadership and corruption, if he can just keep citizens distracted until after the 2010 elections.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:42 am
by BilboBagend
As always. justupid delusional distortions.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:43 am
by Clownkicker
"...if he can just keep citizens distracted until after the 2010 elections."-RealJustme
If we ever needed proof that RealJustme is out of touch with reality and living in the past, there it is. :lol:
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:30 pm
by RealJustme
If we ever needed proof that RealJustme is out of touch with reality and living in the past, there it is. :lol:
Clownkicker Posts: 120Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:55 am
Top
I see I went right over your head once again! 2014 is on track to be 2010 all over again with sweeping GOP success, in 2010 Obama was faulted by Rahm Emanuel who was his Chief of Staff, for not turning the public's attention to matters other than the failings of the Democratically controlled Government. Obama has learned his lesson, he is the process of starting riots to give the Country something else to concentrate on ahead on the 2014 election.
The 2010 United States elections were held on Tuesday, November 2, 2010. During this midterm election year, all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives and 37 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate were contested in this election along with 38 state and territorial governorships, 46 state legislatures (except Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia),[1] four territorial legislatures and numerous state and local races. The election occurred in the middle of Democratic President Barack Obama's first term in office. The Democratic Party suffered massive defeats in many national and state level elections, with many seats switching to Republican Party control. The Republican Party gained 63 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, recapturing the majority, and making it the largest seat change since 1948 and the largest for any midterm election since the 1938 midterm elections
Now don't you feel silly clown? :mrgreen:
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:35 pm
by Clownkicker
^^^^^This clown is exactly like Leroy.
He first admits he's wrong, and then he claims his being idiotically wrong proves he's right.
What a douche. :lol:
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:41 pm
by johnforbes
The only eyewitness said Trayvon was on top, and that was compatible with Zim's injuries.
Standard self-defense case.
Was Zim a saint? No. Is being on Neighborhood Watch a bad thing? No, that's good.
Was Trayvon, who tweeted as "NO LIMIT NIGGA" and puffed pot and tweeted about fighting, a dumb kid headed for nothing good? Probably.
Did Trayvon hide behind a bush and attack Zim during the missing 4 minutes? Perhaps. Nobody really knows.
The instant case, like most, was a mess.
But the race-baiting, from Sharpton and Obama, does no good.
Meanwhile, if a white is attacked in a crime, it is overwhelmingly likely the criminal will be black.
If a black is attacked, it is likely it'll be another black.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:03 pm
by BilboBagend
A shit load of self serving cyclic reasoning based on speculation and support of vigilantism regardless of the intent and malice of the vigilante.
All bullshit.
"Stand Your Ground" legalizes murder based on defending yourself at the last second when you attack another person. Crap only the most malignant and stupid in our society can support.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:17 pm
by RealJustme
"Stand Your Ground" legalizes murder based on defending yourself at the last second when you attack another person. Crap only the most malignant and stupid in our society can support
Shirley, you run like a little girl if a bad person approaches you, the rest of us will do the men's work and stand our ground.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:22 am
by BilboBagend
Aw, little justupoid feels like a man because of "stand you ground". How pathetic and dishonest can one get? justupoid shows us all.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:41 pm
by johnforbes
Black males are 10 times more likely to commit murder than whites and Hispanics combined.
When a young black male with a hood up is walking slowly through a gated neighborhood at night in the rain, any reasonable Neighborhood Watch person (and neighborhood watch people are doing good work generally) would take a look at such a person.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 1:49 pm
by BilboBagend
Still no riots. Yet, there is a bunch of irrelevant shitbeing spewed. Shit everyone knows. Shit everyone cares about. Shit people are working on. Oh, and the distortions and lies made out of what would otherwise be realbissues in the proper context.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:30 pm
by sillydaddy
Bilbo........Tell that to the mother of Antonio West. Where's your outrage for his murder?
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:55 pm
by BilboBagend
Many people have been murdered.
Only a total idiot think that all murders need to be addressed if any one is addressed. Only a dishonest get wants to imply that all murders have the same social and political impact and importance.
But, thanks for the attempted diversion. It proves how baseless, principle free a person you are.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:54 pm
by RealJustme
Many people have been murdered.
Only a total idiot think that all murders need to be addressed if any one is addressed. Only a dishonest get wants to imply that all murders have the same social and political impact and importance.
Shirley you confused us on that one, what were you trying to say?
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:33 am
by BilboBagend
Sorry. Wait until you grow up and have more education.
Re: What No Riots?????
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 7:36 am
by BilboBagend
BTW:
The reality is that no community has been more concerned and involved in the issues of black violence and it's remediation than the black community. But thanks for all the clearly false rhetoric implying otherwise that comes out of the dishonest extreme radical reactionary camp.