The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Trayvon "White ass cracker" looking at me.

Yeah Obama white ass crackers are looking at you, get over it.

So there was a racist in the mix, and it was apparently Trayvon.

What's really telling is the prosecution's key witness testified she felt it was a racist attack on Trayvon because Trayvon said he was a creep ass cracker, she said crackers are racist. :lol:

No matter how you look at it Zimmerman saw a black kid walking through a white neighborhood and decided that he didn't belong there. Zimmerman followed and confronted, those are the facts, right on the 911 tapes. And what happened next only Zimmerman knows...

No matter how you look at it Zimmerman saw a black kid walking through a white neighborhood and decided that he didn't belong there. Zimmerman followed and confronted, those are the facts, right on the 911 tapes. And what happened next only Zimmerman knows...

So?

RealJustme wrote:

No matter how you look at it Zimmerman saw a black kid walking through a white neighborhood and decided that he didn't belong there. Zimmerman followed and confronted, those are the facts, right on the 911 tapes. And what happened next only Zimmerman knows...

So?

Do you don't get insightful information from Faux news.

We can't spell everything out in crayola for you.

If you understood why the state brought up Zimmerman on murder charges then you would have a clue...

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:

""The circumstances of Martin's death, the initial decision not to charge Zimmerman, and questions about Florida's stand-your-ground law received national and international attention. Allegations of racist motivation for both the shooting and police conduct, along with intense media reporting that was sometimes inaccurate, contributed to public demands for Zimmerman's arrest.""


Is this the clue you are talking about elk?

Hell, even Obama was calling Martin, son !!

One might ask, with greater force, about people who get all their news from CNN, CBS, the NY Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, the Boston Globe, USA Today, and the rest of the media outlets who design their "news" by means of Political Correctness.

These media outlets saw a chance to portray Trayvon as Rosa Parks. But it turns out Trayvon was kicked out of school, sold dope, and was a dope.

As for Zimmerman, he was no angel either, but there's a ton of doubt in the case, and a judge with a backbone might already be thinking of a directed verdict.

johnforbes wrote:One might ask, with greater force, about people who get all their news from CNN, CBS, the NY Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, the Boston Globe, USA Today, and the rest of the media outlets who design their "news" by means of Political Correctness.

These media outlets saw a chance to portray Trayvon as Rosa Parks. But it turns out Trayvon was kicked out of school, sold dope, and was a dope.

As for Zimmerman, he was no angel either, but there's a ton of doubt in the case, and a judge with a backbone might already be thinking of a directed verdict.

Zimmerman's story didn't jibe to begin with. And a judge has no business to go against the will of a jury.

As for Zimmerman, he was no angel either, but there's a ton of doubt in the case, and a judge with a backbone might already be thinking of a directed verdict.

Agree 100%, the judge put a stop to this circus but it would take more balls than this women has. Future generations will look back up this and wonder how this hole trial could have been allowed to happen.

One purpose of the judicial system is to gain public acceptance.

For this reason, courthouses are fancy buildings, judges wear robes, and people testify under oath.

But cameras in the courtroom, or quick transcripts of proceedings, have worked against the notion of wise judges furrowing their brows as to what the law is and how to apply it.

Roberts made a fool of himself in the Obamacare ruling, saying it might be a tax when Obama toured the land angrily saying it was not.

And, with more televised scrutiny, millions can see that Lance Ito and other judges are mere mortals.

Although a directed verdict would be warranted in the Trayvon case, any hope for public acceptance (i.e., no Rodney King-type riots) means letting the jury take a crack at it.

By the way, one person who argued this -- who may still be teaching at Yale Law -- is Jerry Mashaw.

elklindo69 wrote:No matter how you look at it Zimmerman saw a black kid walking through a white neighborhood and decided that he didn't belong there. Zimmerman followed and confronted, those are the facts, right on the 911 tapes. And what happened next only Zimmerman knows...

Not true at all, not according to the 911 call audio, not according to Zimmerman, not according to anything we have.

The truth is that a Suspicious person was going between houses, around houses, not using the sidewalks, was reported as such, was followed by a good citizen because most B/E, criminals DO GET AWAY before the police arrive - and GZ had no expectation that this suspicious person would violently attack him.

As things have been show, TM violentely confronted GZ, even used racist comments, was known to be violent, was known to be a thug, was only in the neighborhood because his mother had been unable to control him and sent him to live with his father...

Zimmerman was Confronted my TM, a known thug - we know this because Zimmerman was only following him, from the 911 tapes - and that's perfectly legal and justified.

Your entire slant is based on your own racist views and hate.

Leroy wrote:

elklindo69 wrote:No matter how you look at it Zimmerman saw a black kid walking through a white neighborhood and decided that he didn't belong there. Zimmerman followed and confronted, those are the facts, right on the 911 tapes. And what happened next only Zimmerman knows...

Not true at all, not according to the 911 call audio, not according to Zimmerman, not according to anything we have.

The truth is that a Suspicious person was going between houses, around houses, not using the sidewalks, was reported as such, was followed by a good citizen because most B/E, criminals DO GET AWAY before the police arrive - and GZ had no expectation that this suspicious person would violently attack him.

As things have been show, TM violentely confronted GZ, even used racist comments, was known to be violent, was known to be a thug, was only in the neighborhood because his mother had been unable to control him and sent him to live with his father...

Zimmerman was Confronted my TM, a known thug - we know this because Zimmerman was only following him, from the 911 tapes - and that's perfectly legal and justified.

Your entire slant is based on your own racist views and hate.

Leroy now you're being stupid, don't go and make up shit when we all have the transcripts of the calls.

First Zimmerman claims that Martin "came out of the bushes" and attacked him.

THERE WERE NO BUSHES!!!

The only reason there should be riots in the trial is if a corrupt legal system convicts an innocent man but there is no way in hell he can be convicted unless Democrats warp the system and allow Martin's family to decide rather than the jury.

elklindo69 wrote:Leroy now you're being stupid, don't go and make up shit when we all have the transcripts of the calls.

First Zimmerman claims that Martin "came out of the bushes" and attacked him.

THERE WERE NO BUSHES!!!

The lady cop, today, testified that there were bushes, and the 911 call that we've all heard didn't mention anything about bushes, but, Zimmerman has been completely consistent in his accounting of the actions that night.

elklindo69 wrote:Leroy now you're being stupid, don't go and make up shit when we all have the transcripts of the calls.

First Zimmerman claims that Martin "came out of the bushes" and attacked him.

THERE WERE NO BUSHES!!!

It's really amazing how much of a hater/racist you are - to make up lies, when the evidence was presented that there ARE bushes: http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/01 ... rtin-day-6

Look about 1/2 way down the page, at the testimony from 2:19PM today - let me make it simple for you, here is the COP SHOWING A PICTURE OF THE BUSHES: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/rel ... bushes.jpg and then the prosecution objects to her showing that there are bushes.... dumbass racist.

Now that Elk has been debunked again, he'll come up with another liberal talking point to try and justify jailing the Mexican because his skin is lighter than Trayvon's.

RealJustme wrote:Now that Elk has been debunked again, he'll come up with another liberal talking point to try and justify jailing the Mexican because his skin is lighter than Trayvon's.

Him and his alter-ego, clownasslicker, are like that - they will lie to your face while you're holding what they are lying about, and even claim you aren't holding it because you're a racist.

Of course, Leroy can't show a single example of where I have lied about anything, yet he will lie outright about it anytime he feels like it.

Leroy's dishonesty and denial in the face of recorded reality is incomprehensible.
What does he think he gains by having everyone know he's a liar?

Obama said if he had a son it would be like Trayvon. No doubt he would.

Leroy wrote:

elklindo69 wrote:Leroy now you're being stupid, don't go and make up shit when we all have the transcripts of the calls.

First Zimmerman claims that Martin "came out of the bushes" and attacked him.

THERE WERE NO BUSHES!!!

It's really amazing how much of a hater/racist you are - to make up lies, when the evidence was presented that there ARE bushes: http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/01 ... rtin-day-6

Look about 1/2 way down the page, at the testimony from 2:19PM today - let me make it simple for you, here is the COP SHOWING A PICTURE OF THE BUSHES: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/rel ... bushes.jpg and then the prosecution objects to her showing that there are bushes.... dumbass racist.

But a Google map of the area where the attack is said to have occurred does not appear to show any bushes near the spot, and Zimmerman was unable to tell Ms Singleton if Martin jumped out from in front of him or from behind him.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... hears.html

But a Google map of the area where the attack is said to have occurred does not appear to show any bushes near the spot,

But photos of the scene taken by police show the bushes are there.

elklindo69 wrote:But a Google map of the area where the attack is said to have occurred does not appear to show any bushes near the spot, and Zimmerman was unable to tell Ms Singleton if Martin jumped out from in front of him or from behind him.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... hears.html

Now who's being stupid and dishonest - the COP was holding pictures of the area where this took place, period.

"
It's really amazing how much of a hater/racist you are - to make up lies, when the evidence was presented that there ARE bushes: http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/01 ... rtin-day-6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Look about 1/2 way down the page, at the testimony from 2:19PM today - let me make it simple for you, here is the COP SHOWING A PICTURE OF THE BUSHES: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/rel ... bushes.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and then the prosecution objects to her showing that there are bushes.... dumbass racist.
"

Elk's Google satellite pics over ride the pics the police took of the bushes at the scene. NSNBC has told their viewers to disregard the police photos showing the bushes and concentrate on the satellite pictures. They assured their viewers that if enough people stick to their talking points it will convince people the bushes weren't there proving Zimmerman is a racist murder.

Zimmerman claimed that he couldn't tell if Martin came from the front or behind.

The bushes are far off from the scene of the crime...

So?

elklindo69 wrote:Zimmerman claimed that he couldn't tell if Martin came from the front or behind.

The bushes are far off from the scene of the crime...

Seems to be selective wording - the entire area where TM walked and then confronted GZ is the crime scene, and there are bushes in that path, as the COP shows: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/rel ... bushes.jpg

What Obama did, in the case of the Boston professor and the Trayvon case, was simply assume the black person was innocent.

That sort of lazy non-thinking is precisely the opposite of what one would hope to find in a Harvard grad.

That sort of lazy non-thinking is precisely the opposite of what one would hope to find in a Harvard grad.

Thus the reason the "promised" most transparent President in history has sealed all his educational records through his attorneys. Bush's records disclosed that that he had a greater grade average than Kerry but yet Obama has sued to keep his grades and records secret. So to call him a Harvard grad is a big question.