The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Now you can bet your bottom dollar Obama will send aid and military help to the rebels. Before Obama wasn't sure if they were anti-American or not but now that he knows they are they'll get Obama's 100% support. Watch for US Forces be used to back them up.

Leaders of the Syrian rebel group's pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda's replacement for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist group's influence is not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well.

Lebanese Sheik Omar Bakri, a Salafist who says states must be governed by Muslim religious law, says al-Qaeda has assisted al Nusra for some time

Told ya!

WASHINGTON — Despite Tuesday's public pledge of loyalty to al-Qaeda by Syrian opposition rebel leaders, the Obama administration announced this morning that the United States will provide direct military aid to them for the first time.

White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said that the president has decided to step up "military support" to the opposition group rebels to bolster their effectiveness, but declined to "inventory" what military weapons and equipment would be provided.

Can you tell us again why RealJustme is supporting the use of chemical weapons by Assad?
He apparently wants U.S. aid to go to Assad instead of the rebels.
Or is RealJustme saying that he wants a regional war to break out instead?

This RealJustme clown has me really puzzled with his support of leaders who will use weapons of mass destruction against their own people.

Can you tell us again why RealJustme is supporting the use of chemical weapons by Assad?

The enemy of an enemy is a friend. Assad is a friend to the United States compared to the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda supporters trying to take Syria over. Look what they done in Libya and Egypt once they took over the Countries after "Obama" helped them oust their moderate leaders.

These are the animals you want to give weapons to? The United States is only allowed to interfere with another Country when it's in the United State's National security interests. It is not in our interests to place al-Qaeda leaders in charge of Syria.

www.washingtontimes.com. Members of a Syrian rebel executed a 15-year-old boy in front of his parents after kidnapping and torturing him for making disrespectful statements about Islam's Prophet Muhammad.

Mohammad Qataa was seized Saturday in Aleppo by gunmen with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria — formerly known as the Nusra Front — after he was overheard saying during an argument with another, “Even if the Prophet Muhammad comes down [from heaven], I will not become a believer,” according toReuters.

The captors displayed the bloody and beaten boy to a crowd on Sunday, issuing a warning to those who might similarly speak of the prophet before shooting the teen.

^^^^^RealJustme goes on record supporting the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Is anyone the least bit surprised?

This clown is one of those who supported taking out Saddam simply because he supposedly POSSESSED weapons of mass destruction.
Now he doesn't care if someone actually has them and actually uses them.

The result? Bush's policy invited Al Qaida into Iraq .
So if it's good policy when Bush does it, why is it suddenly so bad if Obama does it?

And then RealJustme can't figure out why nobody respects his hypocritical views.

RealJustme goes on record supporting the use of weapons of mass destruction.

Where did I say that?

You support Assad.
Assad used chemical weapons.
You don't want him removed because apparently you aren't outraged any longer by the actual use of chemical weapons, unlike your howling to have Saddam removed for allegedly possessing chemical weapons.

The only conclusion to draw is that you now tacitly condone the use of chemical weapons or else you would be calling for Obama to invade and remove Assad, just as you applauded Bush for the same thing.

You don't want him removed because apparently you aren't outraged any longer by the actual use of chemical weapons, unlike your howling to have Saddam removed for allegedly possessing chemical weapons.

Who said I didn't want him removed?

So tell us whether or not you want Assad removed.

Of course, you don't. You actually like the SOB.
You only want to bash Obama, not actually discuss the difficult choices we face in Syria.
If you can't bash Obama, then you won't take a stance for fear it might agree with Obama's policies at some point.
Then what would you do if you had to admit you agreed with Obama on something?
You'd be ejected from the FOXnews sock puppet and ventriloquist dummy club.

So tell us whether or not you want Assad removed.

I'll keep it simple so as not to confuse you. I would rather have Assad running Syria than the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda. I am not saying Assad is a good leader. It is not in "our" Country's interest to have him replaced by terrorists we are war with.

RealJustme wrote:

So tell us whether or not you want Assad removed.

I'll keep it simple so as not to confuse you. I would rather have Assad running Syria than the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda. I am not saying Assad is a good leader. It is not in "our" Country's interest to have him replaced by terrorists we are war with.

So according to conservatives, they want Saddam Hussein out and this Assad guy in???????????????????????????????

The stupid meter reading is off scale....

So according to conservatives, they want Saddam Hussein out and this Assad guy in???????????????????????????????

Saddam is out, he was killed several years ago, please try and keep up Elk.

Ah, the old implied lie of the false conservative. The implied all inthe title.

Do you understand the word "bigotry"?

Wow, justuoid can mimic, yet feels a need to hide it in another thread. LOL

He still has no clue.

Time for Elk to come in asking where the WMD in Iraq is. :lol:

RealJustme wrote:Time for Elk to come in asking where the WMD in Iraq is. :lol:

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:

Posting various icons isn't tantamount to rational discourse.

Posting moot platitudes isn't tantamount to intelligent discourse either, but that doesn't stop you.

johnforbes wrote:Posting various icons isn't tantamount to rational discourse.

It does have artistic merit...

The same can't be said about your frequent bullshit laden posts on the board. If you make something up, at least make it believable...

Posting various icons isn't tantamount to rational discourse.

the faux

Yet, it is the appropriate and rational response to a shit load of nonsense and lies.

Leaders of the Syrian rebel group's pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda's replacement for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist group's influence is not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well.

Lebanese Sheik Omar Bakri, a Salafist who says states must be governed by Muslim religious law, says al-Qaeda has assisted al Nusra for some time

Now Obama fully supports the Syrian rebels even as they chant death to America and plan terrorists plots he's providing them with 10's of millions in cash plus military weapons.