Page 1 of 1

History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:23 pm
by Leroy
http://www.truethevote.org/news/a-histo ... ee-ballots

Democrats have been abusing the vote for many decades...

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:43 pm
by elklindo69
What percentage of votes have been found to be fraudlent?

The 0.002% difference wouldn't have helped out Mitt the Twittster win the presidential election....

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:40 am
by BilboBagend
It's just the totally corrupt liar leroy trying to justify his beloved Republican leadership rigging future elections. As always he does it with meaningless facts and twisting distortions. Nothing new with him.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:39 pm
by Leroy
elklindo69 wrote:What percentage of votes have been found to be fraudlent?

The 0.002% difference wouldn't have helped out Mitt the Twittster win the presidential election....
Ah, the denial - then why not let us require positive ID if you think there is no fraud or little fraud?

The fact is that I know there was fraud in Ohio, where precincts only registered votes for Obama, not a single vote for any other candidate - and for the preceding 20 years, it was almost always 70/30 in those precincts.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:55 pm
by BilboBagend
Yes, we see the denial by you every day liar leroy. We also see your constant projection of your essential evil on those you hate. No new surprises coming from you.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:21 pm
by elklindo69
Leroy wrote:
elklindo69 wrote:What percentage of votes have been found to be fraudlent?

The 0.002% difference wouldn't have helped out Mitt the Twittster win the presidential election....
Ah, the denial - then why not let us require positive ID if you think there is no fraud or little fraud?

The fact is that I know there was fraud in Ohio, where precincts only registered votes for Obama, not a single vote for any other candidate - and for the preceding 20 years, it was almost always 70/30 in those precincts.
It's a hardship to certain segments of the population to obtain government issued ID cards.

Senior citizens, disabled folks, low income, minority, and so fourth.

It's unquestionable that there's absolutely no reason to have voter ID laws.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:37 pm
by BilboBagend
Rational argument has no effect of those like liar leroy and justupid who start with a position and them say anything true, false, or irrelevant to support that position.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:19 pm
by Leroy
elklindo69 wrote:It's a hardship to certain segments of the population to obtain government issued ID cards.

Senior citizens, disabled folks, low income, minority, and so fourth.

It's unquestionable that there's absolutely no reason to have voter ID laws.
There is NO HARDSHIP FOR ANYONE THAT WANTS TO VOTE BEING REQUIRED A PICTURE ID.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:25 pm
by Leroy
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... d/2087893/

Just another example of how democrats cheat and then deny it.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:36 pm
by Leroy
Richardson is one of three people charged so far in a voter fraud investigation by the Hamilton County Board of Elections and the Prosecutor's Office.

As WVXU's Howard Wilkinson reported, a 75-year-old Symmes Township man asked the court to put him in a diversion program. Russell Glossop is accused of voting illegally last fall for his dead wife.

Tuesday, Sisters of Charity nun Marguerite Kloos pleaded guilty for voting for another nun who had died.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:49 pm
by BilboBagend
I feel I must apologize to justupid. I often lump him in with liar leroy. This is a nasty and improper thing to do. Justupid is in my opinion not the malevolent intentionally dishonest and dishonorable racist and bigot that liar leroy is. He does not really exhibit the bold faced malevolence and hatred that liar leroy does. He does not exhibit the absolute total blindness and total bias that liar leroy does. He occasionally takes rational though most often prejudicial positions based on ignorance and fear, but he does so it what seems like an honest way. It seems he tries to tell the truth as he sees it an that he simply can not distinguish the flood of lies that people like liar leroy propagate from the reality. Whereas, liar leroy seems to be fully and intentionally dishonest and dishonorable and exhibits a psychotic dedicated sense of malice, fear, and hatred with a total inability to tell the truth or admit any substantive error. liar leroy is all about his message of destructive hate. justupid is really trying to do the best he can in his limited capacity understanding.

So, I apologize to justupid. I have often associate the malice and dishonesty of a psychopath to you and you do not deserve that label.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:20 pm
by Leroy
You always resort to misdirection when you've been shown to be wrong, by the facts, and you are not man enough to admit your mistake.

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:21 pm
by Leroy
More voting fraud - this time it was lost votes that were not counted...

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Sa ... 73711.html

Re: History Lesson on Stolen Elections

Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:23 am
by Leroy
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;