The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Knife attacks kill far more people than assault weapons, but we don't hear anything about this from libs.

In china, the same day as Newtown children were being killed by a mentally unstable liberal, school children were being attacked by a unstable knife wielding attacker. The same thing happens in our country, daily, knife attacks in our schools, on our streets, in our mass-transportation systems - yet liberals are silent on this, going after laws and rules that won't make people ANY SAFER.

Apparently Leroy is unaware that knives are required for most food preparation and can be made by anyone out of nearly anything-stone, wood, metal, plastic, bone, ceramic ...Anyone expecting to ban them would be a moron.

Guns, however, can only be made by relatively few people and are not actually needed by anyone, as human survival for 40,000 years without them attests.
Knives, on the other hand, played a critical role in that survival.

Does this clown Leroy always post such idiotic threads?

Guns, however, can only be made by relatively few people and are not actually needed by anyone,

Tell to the thousands of people who's lifes are saved every year by someone with a gun. Guns are the only thing keeping millions of thugs (yes I said millions) from kicking in doors and taking what they want. They may be thugs but they respect a homeowner with a gun, take away that homeowner's gun and there is no respect, just blood lust.

So Realjustme, are you saying we should or shouldn't ban knives because we need to be protected from guys like you?

So Realjustme, are you saying we should or shouldn't ban knives because we need to be protected from guys like you

Of course we shouldn't ban knifes, what makes you think I want to ban knifes? Someone pulls a knife on me I'll blow them away with my gun, I ain't afraid of no stinking knife.

Clownkicker wrote:Apparently Leroy is unaware that knives are required for most food preparation and can be made by anyone out of nearly anything-stone, wood, metal, plastic, bone, ceramic ...Anyone expecting to ban them would be a moron.

As we've seen from masses of evidence, Guns are required for most protection against violent actions/criminals - that's why police and other LE carry them. Anyone expecting to man a device that causes so little loss of life, while protecting so many daily, would be a moron.

"Anyone expecting to man a device that causes so little loss of life, while protecting so many daily, would be a moron."

^^^^Leroy goes on record to say that Libs would be morons to try to ban knives. Since Libs don't want to ban knives, I can only conclude that Leroy agrees with the Libs on this issue.

So why did he start this thread?
Looks like trolling and nothing more.

Clownkicker wrote:"Anyone expecting to man a device that causes so little loss of life, while protecting so many daily, would be a moron."

^^^^Leroy goes on record to say that Libs would be morons to try to ban knives. Since Libs don't want to ban knives, I can only conclude that Leroy agrees with the Libs on this issue.

So why did he start this thread?
Looks like trolling and nothing more.

Seems that you're really showing your ignorance or stupidity here - More people are killed by Knives each year than assault weapons, but don't let that fact kick your ass to far.

And assault weapons kill more people per year than 12" knives.

Yes, civilian assault weapons, a small subset of all guns, kill more people than 12" knives, another small subset of knives.

So why don't you make a fair comparison of apples to apples, Leroy, instead of your distorted comparison of a specific class of one item to an entire class of another item?

Because you're obviously a dishonest clown, that's why.

Clownkicker wrote:And assault weapons kill more people per year than 12" knives.

Yes, civilian assault weapons, a small subset of all guns, kill more people than 12" knives, another small subset of knives.

So why don't you make a fair comparison of apples to apples, Leroy, instead of your distorted comparison of a specific class of one item to an entire class of another item?

Because you're obviously a dishonest clown, that's why.

Interesting how YOU HAVE TO TWIST AND MISDIRECT when called out for your lies, and then you continue to twist and misdirect again with 12" knives. I never limited my comments to 12" knives - but it's obvious that you have the same comprehension skills as Dildo.

1,704 were MURDERED by knives or other "Cutting" instruments in 2010
0,745 were MURDERED by HANDS/FISTS/FEET in 2010
0,358 were murdered by RIFLES in 2010 - not just assault rifles

So, according to REAL numbers, Knives and people are far more dangerous than the "Assault Weapons" that you zealots want to ban, but you're not doing anything about it.

Yes I found your cherry picked source, Leroy.
If you had posted all of it you would see that "In 2010 there were 358 murders involving rifles. Murders involving the use of handguns in the US that same year totaled 6,009, with another 1,939 murders with the firearm type unreported."

You're still posting a subset of the data, so you must post a similar subset of knives to make the comparison fair.

There are still many more deaths by guns(over 8300 in 2010) in the U.S. than by knives(1704 by your count,) but you are distorting the facts by comparing a small subset of one class of weapon to an entire class of another weapon.
Either compare guns to knives (in which case knives are less lethal by almost 5 to 1) or else compare assault weapons to a similar specialized subset of assault knives.
That would be a fair comparison, but you aren't fair, are you, clown.

Clownkicker wrote:Yes I found your cherry picked source, Leroy.
If you had posted all of it you would see that "In 2010 there were 358 murders involving rifles. Murders involving the use of handguns in the US that same year totaled 6,009, with another 1,939 murders with the firearm type unreported."

You're still posting a subset of the data, so you must post a similar subset of knives to make the comparison fair.

There are still many more deaths by guns(over 8300 in 2010) in the U.S. than by knives(1704 by your count,) but you are distorting the facts by comparing a small subset of one class of weapon to an entire class of another weapon.
Either compare guns to knives (in which case knives are less lethal by almost 5 to 1) or else compare assault weapons to a similar specialized subset of assault knives.
That would be a fair comparison, but you aren't fair, are you, clown.

You are still misdirecting and diverting - this thread is about ASSAULT WEAPONS and how other weapons/items kill more people in the USA than Assault Weapons.

Make your own thread if you don't want to stick to the thread topic.

"this thread is about ASSAULT WEAPONS and how other weapons/items kill more people in the USA than Assault Weapons."-Leroy

No, Leroy, this thread is about distorting the facts by an unfair comparison of apples and oranges.
It is a waste of time for anyone to seriously discuss such nonsense.
Thus, I kick clowns instead.
It's entertaining when I find someone like you who relishes being on the receiving end so much.

Looks like after Bilbo the clown got busted with his Freedman nick so he's created a clownkicker one. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Mass murder at schools and shopping malls by bazookas and canon are also less than with handguns and machine guns.

So what!

Murder by tactical nuclear bomb are also less. Maybe they should be available on the open market without background check.

What fucking stupidity and dishonesty comes from these violent cowards who want unlimited, unrestricted gun sales.

BilboBagend wrote:Mass murder at schools and shopping malls by bazookas and canon are also less than with handguns and machine guns.

So what!

Murder by tactical nuclear bomb are also less. Maybe they should be available on the open market without background check.

What fucking stupidity and dishonesty comes from these violent cowards who want unlimited, unrestricted gun sales.

Amazing how you and your fake can't stick to a discussion and have to misdirect and distort.

ROFLMAOAY.

So, you have nothing and realize it. Poor try at a fake. You are so obvious. You are just a liar as always.

[quote="Clownkicker"No, Leroy, this thread is about distorting the facts[/quote]

There, I fixed your post for you - since all you have is distortion and misdirection on your side.

"[quote="Clownkicker"No, Leroy, this thread is about distorting the facts[/quote]
There, I fixed your post for you..."-Leroy

^^^^Wow, even Leroy admits his thread is about distorting the facts, just as I said.
Leroy agrees with me- but why does he start threads to distort the facts? It's on record in his own post.
A rare moment of honesty from this clown.

Clownkicker wrote:"[quote="Clownkicker"No, Leroy, this thread is about distorting the facts

There, I fixed your post for you..."-Leroy

^^^^Wow, even Leroy admits his thread is about distorting the facts, just as I said.
Leroy agrees with me- but why does he start threads to distort the facts? It's on record in his own post.
A rare moment of honesty from this clown.[/quote]

I see you're still distorting, it's all you got son, and that's pretty piss poor on your part.

Why is it that radical, zealot, stupid, liberals can't discuss anything without resorting to misdirection and distortion?

"Why is it that radical, zealot, stupid, liberals can't discuss anything without resorting to misdirection and distortion?"-Leroy

^^^^^Yes, I've wanted to know that about you, Leroy.
But why do you call yourself a radical, zealot, stupid liberal?
I'm pretty sure you aren't liberal.
Other than that, your in-depth self-knowledge is remarkable for a clown.

Leroy wrote:Knife attacks kill far more people than assault weapons, but we don't hear anything about this from libs.

In china, the same day as Newtown children were being killed by a mentally unstable liberal, school children were being attacked by a unstable knife wielding attacker. The same thing happens in our country, daily, knife attacks in our schools, on our streets, in our mass-transportation systems - yet liberals are silent on this, going after laws and rules that won't make people ANY SAFER.

Since libs can't seem to stay on topic I've posted it again.

It sounds like Leroy is saying laws against carrying guns and knives in schools are silly since such laws don't stop 100% of killings in schools.

Why do you want to allow guns and knives in schools, Leroy?
You actually think that if the laws against carrying weapons in schools were repealed that schools would be safer?
You actually think if all students were packing guns and knives that schools would be a safer place?
Now that's truly stupid.

Clownkicker wrote:It sounds like Leroy is saying laws against carrying guns and knives in schools are silly since such laws don't stop 100% of killings in schools.

Why do you want to allow guns and knives in schools, Leroy?
You actually think that if the laws against carrying weapons in schools were repealed that schools would be safer?
You actually think if all students were packing guns and knives that schools would be a safer place?
Now that's truly stupid.

It really appears that you're only able to make-up shit when someone has a position that you don't like.

It's really funny that you suggest I stand for something when I've never posted anything that would give any hint of what you suggest I stand for.

Now, why aren't you calling for regulations and banning of assault knives that kill more people in this country than "assault" guns?

"Now, why aren't you calling for regulations and banning of assault knives that kill more people in this country than "assault" guns?"-Leroy

Because they don't, you imbecile.
As I showed you, knives are 5-to-1 less a problem than guns.
I am not going to ban paring knives just because someone uses a hunting knife to kill someone.
I am, however, going to ban large hunting knives in schools while leaving the paring knives in the school cafeteria. Of course, there are laws against "assault" type knives already as most places put a limit on blade length or switch blade mechanisms. So liberals have already called for such laws, which makes your dishonest thread completely stupid and pointless.

But also, you have been claiming that if more people carry guns, violent crimes go down- that guns are the great equalizer for women against assault or for men against robbery, for example.
It follows then that you must also believe that violence in schools would go down if every nerd and wimp carried to protect themselves from bullies.

You are the one who brought school violence into the discussion claiming that laws against guns don't stop 100% of school shootings, implying such laws are silly and pointless.
So go ahead, advocate to arm your children in school. If more children were armed at school then shooters from outside the school would think twice before attacking children at school and school shootings would go down, right?

Or is it now your position that arming everyone in school wouldn't reduce the violence in schools?

It amazing to see liar leroy constantly struggle with his bad attempts to back up his shallow delusional lies with more shallow delusional lies.

Clownkicker wrote:"Now, why aren't you calling for regulations and banning of assault knives that kill more people in this country than "assault" guns?"-Leroy

Because they don't, you imbecile.
As I showed you, knives are 5-to-1 less a problem than guns.

You're being dishonest again - Knives DO kill more people in the USA than Assault Weapons, period, the FBI statistics show this to be the case every year.

FBI 2011 Expanded Homicide Data

(for the Assault Weapons that libs/demos want to ban)
Murders: Rifles 323
Murders: Shotguns: 356

(For weapons/items that libs/demos don't comment on or care about)
Murders: Knifes or other cutting instruments: 1694
Murders: Blunt Objects: 496
Muders: Personal Weapons (Hands, Fists, Feet...): 726

There you go - Assault Weapons, like the ones that liberals want to ban, account for significantly less than other weapon forms. More people are killed by hands/feet/fists than with Assault Weapons.

Drunk Driving kills more people (including children) than Assault Weapons.

Medical Doctors kill more people via malpractice than Assault Weapons.

We don't see Democrats/Liberals demanding more and more restrictive laws/regulations on those, they are virtually silent on them...

What we do see is that the liberals/democrats are afraid of citizens with guns that might exercise the 2nd Amendment right to remove a fascist government, and that scares them more than innocent lives being wasted or snuffed out.

None of the gun laws proposed will actually decrease gun violence, it will only increase violence against innocent people that can no longer protect themselves or others.

Leroy is now pretending that assault rifles are for self defense.
Virtually no one uses an assault rifle for home defense or street defense. They use shotguns or handguns.
Women will not carry them to protect against rapists and men won't carry them for defense against muggers.
No one's self defense capabilities will be harmed by banning assault rifles.
But it's a fact that as long as they are manufactured and sold over the counter, organized gangs, criminals, and nut jobs will use them to assault the public.
Putting these weapons into the hands of criminals and nut cases puts everyone, including police, at greater risk of lethal violence, not safer.

Just admit it, Leroy, it's not about self defense, it's about arming your fantasy 'militias' because you think you're going to fight the U.S. government with semi-automatic weapons.
And you wonder why I call you a clown.

The U.S. Code made switchblade knives illegal to manufacture and sell to most civilians and as a result we have virtually no knife deaths by assault switchblades today. There are far fewer deaths by switchblade assault knives than from assault rifles.
This proves that stopping the manufacture and sale of weapons that serve little or no purpose to average Americans reduces deaths by that weapon.

I notice you refuse to address the point, that arming everyone in schools will not reduce violence in schools and arming everyone on the street will not reduce violence in the street. Quite the contrary.
You know it but blather on with your "la-la-la-la-la" bullshit about slanted, dishonest statistics.

I also notice you skip the fact that liberals have already called for restrictions on assault knives, which is the actual fair comparison to make about assault rifles and the alleged point of this thread.
This thread has no point but you keep posting anyway.

Clownkicker wrote:Leroy is now pretending that assault rifles are for self defense.

Snipped the rest because ANYONE can tell from the part I left that AssLicker is still lying, still claiming positions that I've not made, still diverting and misdirecting. You're even worse than Dildo, your other Nick.

Leroy is now pretending that assault rifles are for self defense.

One of the best home self defense weapons you can get. Why do you think they call it an "assault rifle" if a thug messes with a homeowner owning one and they'll get assaulted! :lol:

You know Leroy is beaten when he can't even try to refute the arguments against his idiotic positions and all he has left is hate and insults.

What a clown. :lol:

Clownkicker wrote:You know Leroy is beaten when he can't even try to refute the arguments against his idiotic positions and all he has left is hate and insults.

What a clown. :lol:

What's really sad is you continuing to not address the statistics in any way other than misdirection and dishonesty and my making false statements about my position.

Here we go again- just the facts:

FBI 2011 Expanded Homicide Data

(for the Assault Weapons that libs/demos want to ban)
Murders: Rifles 323
Murders: Shotguns: 356

(For weapons/items that libs/demos don't comment on or care about)
Murders: Knifes or other cutting instruments: 1694
Murders: Blunt Objects: 496
Muders: Personal Weapons (Hands, Fists, Feet...): 726

There you go - Assault Weapons, like the ones that liberals want to ban, account for significantly less than other weapon forms. More people are killed by hands/feet/fists than with Assault Weapons.

Drunk Driving kills more people (including children) than Assault Weapons.

Medical Doctors kill more people via malpractice than Assault Weapons.

We don't see Democrats/Liberals demanding more and more restrictive laws/regulations on those, they are virtually silent on them...

What we do see is that the liberals/democrats are afraid of citizens with guns that might exercise the 2nd Amendment right to remove a fascist government, and that scares them more than innocent lives being wasted or snuffed out.

None of the gun laws proposed will actually decrease gun violence, it will only increase violence against innocent people that can no longer protect themselves or others.

"
None of the gun laws proposed will actually decrease gun violence, it will only increase violence against innocent people that can no longer protect themselves or others."-Leroy

^^^^^There it is again, Leroy claiming that the law banning assault weapons would harm people's ability for self-defense.
"...no longer protect themselves or others." --the very definition of self defense--protecting themselves or others, like family members. Leroy claims the ban would make people less safe because they could no longer protect themselves or others, so he must be saying that people use assault rifles for self defense. Otherwise, a ban would have no effect on someone's self defense capabilities. Then he lies about me misrepresenting his position, that I'm " still claiming positions that" Leroy' has "not made". You just did, clown.
No one aiming primarily at self defense capabilities is looking for an assault rifle.

Leroy actually believes he will fight the U.S. government with such weapons (that he will illegally modify for automatic fire, of course.) That's how stupid he is.

Clownkicker wrote:"
None of the gun laws proposed will actually decrease gun violence, it will only increase violence against innocent people that can no longer protect themselves or others."-Leroy

^^^^^There it is again, Leroy claiming that the law banning assault weapons would harm people's ability for self-defense.
"...no longer protect themselves or others." --the very definition of self defense--protecting themselves or others, like family members. Leroy claims the ban would make people less safe because they could no longer protect themselves or others, so he must be saying that people use assault rifles for self defense. Otherwise, a ban would have no effect on someone's self defense capabilities. Then he lies about me misrepresenting his position, that I'm " still claiming positions that" Leroy' has "not made". You just did, clown.
No one aiming primarily at self defense capabilities is looking for an assault rifle.

Leroy actually believes he will fight the U.S. government with such weapons (that he will illegally modify for automatic fire, of course.) That's how stupid he is.

Dumb people, like politicians that wave guns around with their fingers on the trigger, and ClownAss, don't really know anything about guns or their use, except what they read on blogs, because they have no real-world personal experience with guns.

You can tell when an IDIOT is talking about guns because they make claims like "Assault weapons are not used for self-defense" or that they imply that people don't use them for self-defense. Sadly, those idiots are just that, idiots.

Just imagine if you told cops and troops not to use an AR to clear a house or defend themselves - many people DO own the AR platform in many configurations as a means of self-defense on their property and other areas, and it's a very effective platform for self-defense.

Most people I know, that have defensive weapons, have what will be defined as an ASSAULT SHOTGUN as well as what will be defined as an ASSAULT RIFLE in their collection for defending their homes/lives/family/friends.

It's amazing just how stupid the anti-gun groups/members are.

So, again, since Knives kill far more people than the Assault Weapons that you zealots want banned, why are you not seeking to address the Knife Killings/Violence problem?

Remember, another IDIOT, Joe Biden, giving advice that would lead to ILLEGAL actions with a shotgun - or how about liberals stating that a Shotgun is safer in your home than a Rifle.... Bet they've never tested shotgun rounds on drywall and seen the shot pass through 3 sets of walls....

Remember, another IDIOT, Joe Biden, giving advice that would lead to ILLEGAL actions with a shotgun - or how about liberals stating that a Shotgun is safer in your home than a Rifle.... Bet they've never tested shotgun rounds on drywall and seen the shot pass through 3 sets of walls

Biden actually advised (on live TV) to fire off a shotgun round through your front door if you get scared, he said that'll scare any bad people away...what an idiot. Liberals supported his insane recommendation. :lol: :lol: :lol:

RealJustme wrote:

Remember, another IDIOT, Joe Biden, giving advice that would lead to ILLEGAL actions with a shotgun - or how about liberals stating that a Shotgun is safer in your home than a Rifle.... Bet they've never tested shotgun rounds on drywall and seen the shot pass through 3 sets of walls

Biden actually advised (on live TV) to fire off a shotgun round through your front door if you get scared, he said that'll scare any bad people away...what an idiot. Liberals supported his insane recommendation. :lol: :lol: :lol:

That's the same shit with open carry. So if you open carry does that mean someone won't mess with you???

I live in NYC and would never go open carry even if was legal. Why?

Because a perp can jump you, get your weapon and rob you. Doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. Do you know how many cops have been disarmed in physical confrontations?

I live in NYC and would never go open carry even if was legal. Why?

Because a perp can jump you, get your weapon and rob you. Doesn't take a genius to figure that one out.

So Police Officers in NYC don't open carry?

By mentioning the stabbings/slashing in China on the same day and in comparison to Newtown, Leroy shoots his own self again.

Compare the death tolls of the stabbing/slashing in China to the shooting carried out by the NRA member in Newtown.

Anyone? Anyone? Justfreedman? Dark Jedis? (I've asked before, but never got an answer: What is a "Dark Jedi?" Is it a Sith?)

By mentioning the stabbings/slashing in China on the same day and in comparison to Newtown, Leroy shoots his own self again.

Compare the death tolls of the stabbing/slashing in China to the shooting carried out by the NRA member in Newtown.

OK, I compared them, so what?

You should stick with posting as Freedman. As much as you try to dumb him down, he's still a lot more on the ball than you using Justme.

Call Leroy and have him post the numbers.

You should stick with posting as Freedman. As much as you try to dumb him down, he's still a lot more on the ball than you using Justme.

I find your post offensive and spitefull, my views are more in line with yours than justmes but in this case everyone knows that knives do kill more people than guns. The difference is there is no way to control knifes since they're essential in every home but we can control hand guns which are far more dangerous and serve no purpose other than to harm other people. I would like to see them all rounded up and eventually the police wouldn't even need them, they could use tazers if someone comes at them with a knife.

elklindo69 wrote:Because a perp can jump you, get your weapon and rob you. Doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. Do you know how many cops have been disarmed in physical confrontations?

How many recorded cases of a person being jumped for the Open Carry weapon can you show us?

Freedman wrote:

You should stick with posting as Freedman. As much as you try to dumb him down, he's still a lot more on the ball than you using Justme.

I find your post offensive and spitefull, my views are more in line with yours than justmes but in this case everyone knows that knives do kill more people than guns. The difference is there is no way to control knifes since they're essential in every home but we can control hand guns which are far more dangerous and serve no purpose other than to harm other people. I would like to see them all rounded up and eventually the police wouldn't even need them, they could use tazers if someone comes at them with a knife.

Why is there no way to control Knives? There are also guns in many homes, far more than can actually be controlled by some asinine law that is only designed to protect the government.

If you can write laws to ban guns you can also write laws to control knife use, ownership, length, etc... All that it takes is someone that is afraid of knives as much as politicians are of guns being used to return the government to the people.

Oh, and the Police in the UK are finding that they DO need their guns now, against the Islamic hoards that are killing and maiming people daily - and the police actually don't go into certain areas because they know they will be killed. How's that working for your gun free society?

Thank God so many people were carrying at the Boston marathon. It is why no one was injured.

Oh, wait. 2 dead, 100 injured, many seriously. No perp identified. An armed public sure did make a difference.

BilboBagend wrote:Thank God so many people were carrying at the Boston marathon. It is why no one was injured.

Oh, wait. 2 dead, 100 injured, many seriously. No perp identified. An armed public sure did make a difference.

You do prove yourself to be conclusively and irrefutably a liar, dishonest, and dishonorable.

It's amazing the length that liberals and democrats will go to distract and misdirect in the event of a disaster, dildo is the worst of all the people I know in the world.

Here we go again- just the facts:

FBI 2011 Expanded Homicide Data

(for the Assault Weapons that libs/demos want to ban)
Murders: Rifles 323
Murders: Shotguns: 356

(For weapons/items that libs/demos don't comment on or care about)
Murders: Knifes or other cutting instruments: 1694
Murders: Blunt Objects: 496
Muders: Personal Weapons (Hands, Fists, Feet...): 726

There you go - Assault Weapons, like the ones that liberals want to ban, account for significantly less than other weapon forms. More people are killed by hands/feet/fists than with Assault Weapons.

Drunk Driving kills more people (including children) than Assault Weapons.

Medical Doctors kill more people via malpractice than Assault Weapons.

We don't see Democrats/Liberals demanding more and more restrictive laws/regulations on those, they are virtually silent on them...

What we do see is that the liberals/democrats are afraid of citizens with guns that might exercise the 2nd Amendment right to remove a fascist government, and that scares them more than innocent lives being wasted or snuffed out.

None of the gun laws proposed will actually decrease gun violence, it will only increase violence against innocent people that can no longer protect themselves or others.

Go on.