The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... P_20130304

[urlhttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm? ... P_20130304][/url]

We've noticed that you're not smart enough to put any of your own thoughts into the links contents that you post - showing that you're just another blind, ignorant, stupid, follower.

We all notice that you have nothing but malice, liar leroy.

BilboBagend wrote:We all notice that you have nothing but malice, liar leroy.

Thanks for proving that you don't actually understand what you post, that you're just a follower. You still can't post any intelligent comment on your links.

liar leroy, do you ever addrsss real issues or deal with real objective facts?


I thought not.

BilboBagend wrote:liar leroy, do you ever addrsss real issues or deal with real objective facts?


I thought not.

I don't know what the issue is because you didn't state your issue or anything, you just blindly posted a link that I'm not going to follow until you explain your reason and position on it.

What, you mean I don't feel the need to make false statements about what the article says like you do? I don't need to lie like you do. Sorry, it's a real article containing real objective facts and analysis. Not a fake flase political argument like all you statements. It's real information. It needs no false support.

BilboBagend wrote:What, you mean I don't feel the need to make false statements about what the article says like you do? I don't need to lie like you do. Sorry, it's a real article containing real objective facts and analysis. Not a fake flase political argument like all you statements. It's real information. It needs no false support.

Yes, you've made it clear that you don't understand the article, the link, the information, because you've continued to show that you can't even make a statement or post a position on it.