The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

"Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) attached his version of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2013 as Senate Amendment 21 (SA 21) to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 2013 (S. 47)"

This was voted down when it was its own, stand alone bill, but he's attached it to another bill, knowing that politicians don't read entire bills before voting on them.

Leahy's (D) amendment cuts funding to the "Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons" (TIP Office) and the endorsement of the decriminalization of prostitution for minors.

"SA 21 contains a provision to change the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Model State Criminal Provisions on Pimping, Pandering, and Prostitution, which is model legislation the DOJ promotes to the states. The change would, in effect, decriminalize prostitution for minors, meaning the DOJ will encourage states to prohibit the charging or prosecution of a minor for engaging in or attempting to engage in prostitution."

So, ask yourself why Democrats would want to decriminalize and weaken Child Prostitution - why do you support them?

Falls right in line with Chicago now teaching 1st graders how to have safe sex, but feel teaching abstinence to the same children would be infringing upon their choices.

I guess they did this so that they won't have to travel outside the USA for their "needs".

Minors will no longer be charge with prostitution in each state voluntarily adopting this new standard. The adults pimping them presumably will still be charged, but the minors will not.

I wonder why so many malignant people want to charge the minors, who are usually slaves, for the crimes of the adults who pimp them?

Aw, yes, the usual crowd.

Maybe this is why Democrats want to decriminalize child prostitution:

"
ALBANY — Pervy Assemblyman Vito Lopez found a 14-year-old intern so sexy that he fantasized aloud about living in a state where it was legal to sleep with underage girls, a source told the Daily News.

After ogling the girl, the 71-year-old Brooklyn Democrat relayed his twisted lament over New York’s statutory rape laws to least one person from his district office, the source said.

The creepy comment comes to light days after the Daily News revealed that the mother of a Lopez staffer called the police after he told the staffer she should dress sexier — like the teenage intern.
...
"

It took you quite a while to find an soundbite that could be pertinent but in fact is irrelevant. Just another case of an adult who might be in trouble if they act on their fantasies, and nothing to do with not prosecuting minors who are either forced or tricked into prostitution by adults.

Didn't take me anytime, I just catch dishonest and immoral democrats as they expose themselves.

Interesting that you don't see the danger to the kids from this DEMOCRAT pervert.

This makes more sense if you look at the expense involved with going all the way to the Dominican Republic.

This makes more sense if you look at the expense involved with going all the way to the Dominican Republic.

I agree, he charged tax payers several hunderd thousand dollars for his frequent Dominican Repuglic trips, it's cheaper on the American tax payers if we just provide him some 15-year-old prostitutes in DC.