The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

No matter all the pictures here http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/view/315856/ are stolen the post is among winners almost a week since it was published.I would not like to post here links to other sites.I have sent those links with original images to VW last week but the post was not removed.The original images from the other site had been modified to make them more difficult to track-they had been flipped horizontally(actually we have mirror images of the original files),the original images had been also cropped to hide face.I expect the post to be removed otherwise cheaters like this will be encouraged in the future.If VW confirms this contri as a winner next week I will stop posting pictures because I do not want to compete with cheaters

Thank you for this information, we rely on our contributors and members to help us find any contris that are stolen and appreciate this. I have contacted the contributions department and they have researched the contri and removed it. We do not condone cheating here, VW is all about voyeurism from our community, not stolen from elsewhere!

Kiki, Why does it take multiple contacts, and then only when you contact them? I had hoped this would improve with Ghost's departure. Not so. Quite sad.

The best place to send any emails regarding stolen contris is to vwadmin@voyeurweb.com as they research all the reports. I am in the process of creating a knowledge base that will assist all users with a variety of questions and also ensure that each question/concern they might have is sent directly to the appropriate party. This will allow the specific issue to be taken care of as quickly as possible without any forwarding involved or me being the "middle woman".

... or me being the "middle woman".

There's a pic i'd like to see.

Kiki wrote:The best place to send any emails regarding stolen contris is to vwadmin@voyeurweb.com as they research all the reports. I am in the process of creating a knowledge base that will assist all users with a variety of questions and also ensure that each question/concern they might have is sent directly to the appropriate party. This will allow the specific issue to be taken care of as quickly as possible without any forwarding involved or me being the "middle woman".

Silly me. I thought using the link "Report this contribution" that is on every contri in the upper right hand corner would be the clear and simple way to get the proper information to VW for removal. The form can send VW the proper links to their posting, and the user can submit the links to the sites that the images were previously shown or stolen from to post here.

Are you telling me the "Report this contribution" link routes to a dead email and no one is reading those reports? Wonderful! Explains quite a bit.

Superguy, I can assure you that being a middle woman in a naked situation is quite a fun time...although that one is one of my "private shots" that doesn't leave the vault

FAQ, Of course I was not saying that, and I am sorry that you have implied or inferred this. The "report this contribution" goes to vwadmin@voyeurweb.com, who do a lot of work to ensure that the contri is properly researched after a report is filed. What I was responding to was in regards to this thread and the post that Contributor had made, as Contributor had sent an email with images which were greatly helpful to us.

Yet submitting the URLs using that link seems to go nowhere. The current status is that every real contributor to VW is now competing against the thieves.

:lol:

Kiki wrote:
Re: Injunction Order From Miami Dade Against VC!

Postby Kiki » Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:06 pm
FAQ - Thank you for the advice, please be assured that VW has no intention of cheating any winners. I have been in contact with just about all of the contributors who have had trouble to ensure that they have either been sent out their checks or determining why they have not received them yet. As far as stolen contris, to me this is the worst as it destroys the true idea of this site, original content from REAL amateurs. Please flag any stolen contri you see and provide the URL of where else the contri can be found, so that we can ensure it gets removed. I am doing everything in my power to make sure that none of the past mistakes get repeated, so this site can continue to grow in a positive direction.

So we report stolen content, and you, yourself, Kiki, post the advertisement to a pay site from where the original image was stolen.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/flash/ass/view/314469/

Trust is a fleeting thing.

What is the use in reporting stolen content if you plan to highlight paysites on VW? Sure, a thieve does not get the credit, but should every paysite webmistress start flooding VW with contri for the free advertisements?

And other reported contri remain in the top ranks. The "REAL amateurs" are getting screwed. I can no longer point to Ghost for not removing these. But he has trained those who remain well to ignore reports.

Please do not accuse me of trying to "advertise." What I posted was a note to the admin to remove the photo as it was from a professional model's site. The note you saw was my reason as to why the contri should be removed, not a comment (I don't ever do the admin comment on photos), as admin requires a URL as proof in order to remove. Admin notes have since been made private, so you will not notice this again. I removed the photo myself now, as it should have been removed already.

I still feel very strongly about my statement, and this is proven by the comment I left for admin to remove the photo from VoyeurWeb, not detracted by it. I have done everything in my power to keep VoyeurWeb amateur - as this is what the community expects and is exactly what should be delivered.

If you notice that a model is not an amateur but a professional, please email VWadmin@voyeurweb.com the URL of where else she can be found, or click on the report contribution link and submit a ticket there, as this goes directly to them as well. FAQ, please submit a test ticket to them if you would like to ensure that this system is indeed working **Updated to reflect comments below**

I stand by what I said, professionals and stolen content do not belong on VoyeurWeb.

Kiki wrote:Please do not accuse me of trying to "advertise." What I posted was a note to the admin to remove the photo as it was from a professional model's site. The note you saw was my reason as to why the contri should be removed, not a comment (I don't ever do the admin comment on photos), as admin requires a URL as proof in order to remove. Admin notes have since been made private, so you will not notice this again. I removed the photo myself now, as it should have been removed already.

I still feel very strongly about my statement, and this is proven by the comment I left for admin to remove the photo from VoyeurWeb, not detracted by it. I have done everything in my power to keep VoyeurWeb amateur - as this is what the community expects and is exactly what should be delivered.

If you notice that a model is not an amateur but a professional, please email me the URL of where else she can be found and I will remove them personally. I stand by what I said, professionals and stolen content do not belong on VoyeurWeb.

The Admin notes should have always been made private. It is part of the trust issue around VW these days. Private matters are made public. And who knows what matters of public interest are being dealt with privately (such as May-July winners, some not all?).

Since you had the ability to remove the photo yourself, why wasn't that done immediately upon seeing that the model was a professional with her own paysite? It makes no sense to delay the removal of stolen images, and even less sense to promote those websites here - intentionally or not.

The contri have a link to report stolen images or professional models. I expect that form once submittal to receive proper and due attention. I am just one of thousands. The form should be sufficient, and its email should be check regularly, and acted upon immediately. The very few that read this BB should not use a different system by emailing you for what the system should be set up to handle from the thousands. The best means for finding stolen images is by having thousands of eyes upon them, and easily and efficiently reported on them.

VW has a broken system. Running around the broken system leaves the broken system in place. Thousands could still use the broken system and wonder why no action has taken place. You need to get the broken system fixed - not provide an end run for a few reports.

And might I suggest a very simple TinEye API lookup as well? I have probably reported a dozen stolen contris that were trivial to find via TinEye. And yes, I haven't posted anything to this site now for over a year because of how bad things have gotten here. And it is too bad too because I have some amazing Ana shots.

joeuser wrote:And might I suggest a very simple TinEye API lookup as well? I have probably reported a dozen stolen contris that were trivial to find via TinEye. And yes, I haven't posted anything to this site now for over a year because of how bad things have gotten here. And it is too bad too because I have some amazing Ana shots.

"You have reached the maximum number of reports you can file within 24 hours."

It would seem VW does not want to know they are posting stolen content.

I believe Kiki wants to get the stolen images removed, but her bosses do not. To the porn masters, content is content.

There is no reason for limiting the reports of stolen content. None. If someone proves unreliable in their information, it is easy to discount their reports.

FAQ, Thanks for alerting me to this, I have already had the tech department increase this number, as upon seeing your post I looked into this and agree the number was too low. While I would like to have zero limits on this in theory, in reality not all people's intentions are as good as yours. This is why the tech guys had to set a limit in the first place, as in the beginning we had issues with spammers flooding the servers with a ton of contribution reports that were filled with BS (none of which obviously had anything to do with any actual reporting) which made sorting through the real reports very difficult.

Joeuser, that sounds like a great idea to implement, thank you very much for the suggestion. I will look into this!