The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Gen James Amos - USMC _ Top General in the USMC and strongest ranking military opponent to gays in the military

Dec 2010 - Gays in the military could cause casualties

Sept 2012 - Gays in the military have no impact

Most gays in the military are still in the closet.

The simple fact is that culturally we are not prepared to have homosexuals openly serving, not because the general population has a problem with them, but because the person they are sharing a bunkroom, shower, foxhole, ect. has a problem with it. Same as they have a problem sharing those things with members of the opposite sex.


When we have a true co-gender military we can have openly homosexuals involved without a problem.

Sept 2012 - Gays in the military have no impact

LOL...his way of saying they're worthless and gays thinks it was a compliment.

No doubt that justupid would have a totally invalid and disjoint rejoinder

It's done. Women are making quick progress. The military has long been one of the leading functional meritocracies. Yes, it has big problems, but it has strong motivation to perform.

Bilbo when a military commander says a certian group of soldiers have "no impact" for the mission, that means they're a waste of beans and fuel.

There is no doubt that a malignant bigot and liar like you would interpret his clear statements is such a false manner.

There is no doubt that a malignant bigot and liar like you would interpret his clear statements is such a false manner.

When a liberal realizes you've won the discussion they "ALWAYS" turn to personal attacks.

LOL

DarknLadyJedi wrote: When we have a true co-gender military we can have openly homosexuals involved without a problem.

Actually, when we have true equality there will be no language for Race, Religion, Sex, Orientation, anywhere in our laws, for any reason.

Leroy wrote:

DarknLadyJedi wrote: When we have a true co-gender military we can have openly homosexuals involved without a problem.

Actually, when we have true equality there will be no language for Race, Religion, Sex, Orientation, anywhere in our laws, for any reason.

I agree with that 100% and it would be nice if we could get there.

Sorry, naive and disingenuous drivel coming from liar leroy our resident bigot. OK, really, just lies from liar leroy who has driven a personal campaign demonizing All Muslims. (Which he will now deny.)

People group thgye3mselves naturally. People will always choose an IN group and many OUT groups. A minority of people, like liar leroy, will always choose to demonize some small local group to make himself feel superior. Laws will alwaus be needed to protect minorities, that enumeration of protections will always grow, especially with people like liar leroy around. People, like liar leroy, who will not let his naive society of equality and freedom to ever come not existence, let alone flourish.

When a liberal realizes you've won the discussion they "ALWAYS" turn to personal attacks.

justupid tries yet again with the same old line, and fails miserably, yet again.

Have you noticed how DildoDumbass can't take his hate or intolerance or stupidity out of his posts?

I'm 100% in support of people being ANY orientation they want, but I believe, in real life, that it does cause problems, and I'm sure that Dildodumbass will now attack me for what the gays even claim.

The fact is that we need to remove all forms of identifiers on Race, Religion, Height, Weight, Gender, Orientation, etc.... When we do that, the country will actually become far greater than any other country and greater than we've been in the past.

Currently our laws cater/pander to the people that claim they want to be equal, but they make laws/rules/quotas to show that they don't truly want to be equal.

I suspect Dildudumbass is one of those people, unable to cut it in the world, filled with hate because he believes his failures are caused by everyone around him (because that's what liberals tell him), and he's completely incapable of moving past his internalized hate and intolerance - he always resorts to lying about those that expose this in him.

We see crazy the dishonest reverse logic liar leroy presents. The logic of a true bigot and racist as any honest person can clearly see. The logic that all the protecionts put into place are unnecessary because it is the protections that create the racism and bigotry that they were put in place to protect against. Racism and bigotry that predated the laws. Racism and bigotry that still exist. Racism and bigotry that liar leroy and his ilk still proffers. A shallow defense of his freedom to be a racist and bigot that he so often has spoken in the past.

Yes, liar leroy. These laws will no longer be needed when your kind are gone. Then and only then can any honest person support fewer words and explicit protections. Only when the details are understood in the general language can we back off from being explicit. Only when it is understood and is a practical reality that any two people may execute any standard secular legal contract the state offers as equal to any other two people with no special cases excluded. Only when it is understood and a practical reality that all subgroups of the population are treated equally under the law. But not until then.

Will you join decency, freedom, liberty, and equality and support laws that explicitly state that any two people may execute any contract offered by the state as equals to any other two people without exclusion? I thought not liar leroy.

The fact is that we need to remove all forms of identifiers on Race, Religion, Height, Weight, Gender, Orientation, etc.... When we do that, the country will actually become far greater than any other country and greater than we've been in the past.

That's going to really piss off liberals. I can smell the outrage at the suggestion that their special interest groups should be treated like everyone else.

More of the dishonest reverse logic of bigots and racists. Now coming from one of the usual sources of such dishonest rhetoric.

Really? It's "special interest" to require non-whites to be treated as equals under the law? Well, yes, I can see how a racist would make such a statement.