Watermark Discrepencies Raise A Security Concern for CONTRI
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:24 pm
Some of the contri now have watermarks that say
Shown at...
Then I saw one that said
Shawn@
Link is below from today
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/view/207298/
That is just weird. Period. Are you outsourcing watermarks to a third world country where the obvious difference is just lost in translation?
For some reason I find this observation oddly unsettling....
Perhaps someone should give a detailed accounting of exactly WHERE as in physical location, (city and state and country is fine) contri are stored and under WHOSE CONTROL. Secondly, WHO exactly reviews contri (again WHERE) and WHERE the servers are (Physical locations) and preferably soon.
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Shown at...
Then I saw one that said
Shawn@
Link is below from today
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/view/207298/
That is just weird. Period. Are you outsourcing watermarks to a third world country where the obvious difference is just lost in translation?
For some reason I find this observation oddly unsettling....
Perhaps someone should give a detailed accounting of exactly WHERE as in physical location, (city and state and country is fine) contri are stored and under WHOSE CONTROL. Secondly, WHO exactly reviews contri (again WHERE) and WHERE the servers are (Physical locations) and preferably soon.
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: