The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

There once was a time, VW never allowed any underage in the images posted. Not even allowed cartoons of kids in profile pics. Some got banned for posting cartoons with children in them. Zero tolerance.

The idea was that VW was about erotic images. Erotic and sexual go hand in hand. Any references to underage was forbidden. Any. Zero tolerance.

Now, most nudist camps are not a sexual in nature. In fact, sexual conduct can you you booted from many nudist camps. They attempt to remain totally family friendly. This is totally different than VW - totally non-family friendly. Nudity is not sexual, in itself. Context makes it sexual. The context of VW makes images sexual here.

Has VW changed that much?
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/view/207065/
Yes, it is a statue, and not a person. But I refer you back to the banning of people for posting cartoon images of children. Zero tolerance on this subject. Once VW allows a little tolerance, where is the line? Will VW allow nude beach pics with children in the background? What about a pic of a mother breast feeding? All quite innocent and acceptable apart from any sexual references, but VW is that sexual reference.

Who reviewed this contri at VW? Who processed the images? Who approved for posting? Had it been a real child, I'd be call the authorities. A statue? Perhaps the right course is for VW to consider firing or giving those people a long time off work without pay. Unless VW wants to change their direction towards a non-Zero tolerance?

Perhaps you are taking it a little far, but... if it was zero then zero it should be.

FAQ is correct. In the past, those photos would not have been posted on VW/RC.

It is an extreme position, but one the old-VW always made. Absolutely no children, not even a drawing.

The Main Page links to this definition of underage

Read some of the comments on the contri. Some morons want to see the woman having sex with the male statue next to the statue of the child. Are these the types of visitors the new-VW wants to attract? There was a very good reason for maintaining a zero tolerance.

If only real children are prohibited, some idiot will submit images of sexual conduct with a large doll or something even more perverted.

That Ghost has not yet removed the images is telling me VW is not the same place I once knew. Underage reports used to get immediate responses.

Thank you for alerting me to this, and I have taken care of it myself. All of those photos are now gone from the site, and should never have been there. I am very sorry those photos got through to be published; this was not acceptable. Please alert me immediately if you see anything else of the sort. I understand that it was not a real person, however this does not matter as we do not allow any sort of imagery that suggests underage in any way. Zero tolerance is just that and we do not make exceptions, as FAQ said anything other than this approach would only invite people to try and post photos that are inappropriate for VW and certainly not welcome here. We are not looking to attract such a crowd and would never condone such activity.

Kiki wrote:Thank you for alerting me to this, and I have taken care of it myself. All of those photos are now gone from the site, and should never have been there. I am very sorry those photos got through to be published; this was not acceptable. Please alert me immediately if you see anything else of the sort. I understand that it was not a real person, however this does not matter as we do not allow any sort of imagery that suggests underage in any way. Zero tolerance is just that and we do not make exceptions. We are not looking to attract such a crowd and would never condone such activity.

Thank-you, but it should not take this long to get action. VW was a global enterprise, where the sun never sets. Someone used to be able to respond to an alert. You might want to investigate that link "Contact Us" on the bottom of each contri page. Either the server/form is broken and no one gets it. Or no one is reading the emails it generates. Or someone reads it and takes no action. Whatever the case, none of those options are acceptable.

Someone is responsible for publishing those images. Someone did condone it to be published here. Who approved that contri?

Kiki, I'm still left hanging here, who all at VW approved that contri?

There is also an underage photo on the "New & Improved"?¿? F & S BB.

Do you mean on the Explicit BBs? Please send me the URL immediately to me so I can ensure that this is taken care of.

It seems to have been found and removed.

This is more discouraging day by day.

Kiki, if you have no intentions in telling us who behind the VW curtain is making some really poor decisions, we do not know if it is some "puny little contractor" or some Big Cheese.

Someone behind that curtain is responsible for posting that contri.
Someone behind the curtain is responsible for banning Wiki users.

Who are you trying to protect? and why?
Was it you? That would be the only logical reason for secrecy.

There's one on the Scenery thread that two users found useful.

Also on the Things that make you laugh thread at F&S.

Silence is the same as condoning.