The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Sanger has been permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia, the website I named and led in 2001. Yes, really. I can hear you asking, “How? What’s going on over there?” The incident reveals something truly damning about “the encyclopedia that anybody can edit.” The irony is that not even a co-founder can edit it if he is attempting to implement his program of reform.

The bizarre event has captured the attention of the global internet, which has been surprised to learn that a relatively small clique of anonymous “administrators” apparently wields such irresistible authority that a founder of the site could be abused for three days and then banned, as so many thousands had been bef

Geezus, dummy, Sanger was absolutely NOT banned for not being leftist enough. You made it up as you make up everything you post.
Do some investigation of what happened instead of merely regurgitating your Right Wing propaganda from your handlers.

And look at Sanger's own quotation that last June he called the website “one of the most effective organs of Establishment propaganda in history.”"

Well, the establishment in America "last June" is Trump and the Republican Party Right Wing dumbfucks, not "leftists", dimwit. If anything, that suggests Sanger was banned for not being rightist enough. (But that's not what happened either.)

Why are Republicans using Wikipedia so heavily for propaganda purposes, johnny?

Nonsense.

Over the past 30 years, the most effective organ in American politics belonged to Bill Clinton.

Perhaps that is why Bill appraised Monica's performance as an intern by saying, in a clipped manner, that: "She sucks."

The founder of Wikipedia was indeed banned from the web site he started for not being enough of a Left Wing nut.

As to the Wikipedia account of the Fabulous Forbes, it reads in pertinent part:

"Mr Forbes is tall, handsome, fit, lightly tanned, charming, gracious, affluent. However, his most conspicuous virtue is his humble demeanor."