The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

First, do no harm.

Hippocrates was correct, and people like Fauci and Birx were wrong.

Lockdowns destroyed jobs, fomented isolation and depression and divorce and substance absuse.

Kids lost 2 years of schooling, and psychiatric problems have risen.

Lockdowns also delayed herd immunity, as experts like Ioannides (MD, PhD) warned.

johnny, why are you starting yet another thread of made up stupid shit?

What is it you think you get out of spreading your unsupported bullshit?

Mr Forbes is -- as ever -- following the science as Fauci and others urged.

Follow the science!

What science, dumbfuck?

You've presented nothing here but unsupported propaganda with a partisan agenda.

Propaganda is not science, dimwit. But then how would you know? You get all your 'news' and 'science' from internet gossip sites.

You did not follow the science. You followed and regurgitated political derision propaganda. And a million died. You sparkle pony patriot. Москва будет рада приветствовать тебя, товарищ

Let's go back over this fine thread and figure out what we have all learned here.

Boiled down to essentials, here it is:

First, do no harm.

Hippocrates was correct, and people like Fauci and Birx were wrong.

Lockdowns destroyed jobs, fomented isolation and depression and divorce and substance absuse.

Kids lost 2 years of schooling, and psychiatric problems have risen.

Lockdowns also delayed herd immunity, as experts like Ioannides (MD, PhD) warned.

But this is NOT a "fine thread", dummy. There isn't a shred of science in it.

When talking about scientific topics, one must include some science. Otherwise it's just made up stupid shit with a transparently partisan agenda. (Accent on the "trans")

Get back to us when you have some documented facts to add to this turd bowl, johnny.

There was no science behind school closures.

Or lockdowns of stores and schools.

Heck, the Covid Era had lunacy such as closing beaches when we all knew that fresh air and sunshine defeated germs.

Thanks to Mr Forbes for this fine thread!

I commend johnforbes for admitting there is no science behind his unsupported claims about school closures and lockdowns.

That he at least realizes he provided no science whatsoever to support his absurd claims is a giant leap forward for such a partisan dimwit.

Thanks to Clown for his graceful admission that there was, as Dr Fauci also admitted, no science whatever behind 6 feet of social distance.

Or wearing non-N95 masks.

Since johnforbes has freely admitted there is no science behind his absurd claims, we look forward to his presentation of the 'science' (conspiracy theory internet gossip) on which he bases his ridiculous claims.

Then everyone will have a basis on which to 'discuss' (laugh at) this trolling partisan made up stupid shit.

"Let's see the science!"

A scientific study of Clowntoker's postings has revealed that 89 percent of them were created with AI and signed via autopen.

Given Clown's cognitive decline (and the low intellectual level he declined from to begin with), the autopen issue is crucial.

So still no science to back up your made up stupid shit. Got it.

That's exactly what we expected from an impotent pussy like you, johnny.

It is true that no science supported the 6 feet of social distance.

Or the mask mandates.

A t-shirt mask was different than an N95 quality mask, which the sole standard which might help with a microscopic virus.

And "microscopic" does describe Clown's science "knowledge"...

So still no science to back up your made up stupid shit about Sweden. Got it.

But you continue to talk about all sorts of unsupported bullshit diversions other than the topic you started this thread about.

Why can't you talk about the science surrounding your own topic, dimwit?

Sadly, that's exactly what we expected from an intellectually impotent pussy like you.

Mr Forbes suspected long ago that HCQ and Ivermectin were efficacious, as well as available and cheap.

Now it is known that the Establishment had to pretend that HCQ and Ivermectin didn't work in order to get the EUA to allow Big Pharma to develop mRNA shots to make 8 billion bucks.

As an investor, Mr Forbes was pleased, but as a citizen less so...

Okay, dimwit, provide a link to the scientific research into Ivermectin regarding COVID.

That you long ago "suspected" Ivermectin had any efficacy at all in fighting COVID only demonstrates your childish gullibility when you had no evidence whatsoever to support such suspicions.

Now you are pretending you have some evidence that it has some efficacy against COVID. Obviously, since I am not as gullible as you are I must see the science before I believe such harmful partisan propaganda. (For someone who keeps blathering on about "First do no harm" you continue to do great harm by first influencing your ignorant friends to refuse to get vaccinated while convincing them to take ineffective poisons to treat their illnesses.)

So show us the evidence, dummy. Unfortunately there are no such studies on the internet. (There ARE scientific studies that demonstrate just the opposite of what you claim.) So you must provide us with a link to your apparently top secret scientific studies that you nut jobs are refusing to release to the world. Prove to us that you are not merely another gullible conspiracy theorist, johnny.

www.HCQandIvermectin worked but Big Phama Had to Pretend they didn't to get the EUA to make 8 billion.com

"Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site. We can’t connect to the server at www.hcqandivermectin."-johnforbes' phony link


Try a real link and a real source next time, dummy. Stop running and hiding like the intellectual chickenshit you are.

The linked source provides the scientific data.

To access it, one would need a computer which is modern, such as perhaps an IBM PC with at least a 40MB half-height Seagate drive.

It would also help if Clowntoker bought a telephone dialup modem and searched on the Worldwide Interwebs...

"The linked source provides the scientific data."-johnfibs

There IS no "linked source", dimwit. Click on your phony link for yourself.

"It would also help if His Lordship...searched on the Worldwide Interwebs..."-johnfimicolous

Of course I copy-and-pasted johnny's own comment into two search engines and they came up with nothing remotely resembling a scientific study, nor even a single article from any source whatsoever supporting johnny's propaganda. Not one. He made it up.

Why not just give us your alleged source so we can access it for ourselves? (That's rhetorical, of course. Everyone already knows you have no source for your propaganda beyond the daily marching orders sent directly to you by your wack job conspiracy theory handlers.)

The link worked fine for Mr Forbes.

Or, rather, for his staff members who pressed it.

The taut, tawny fingers of Forbes don't actually press links themselves.

Still, the grip of Mr Forbes equals that of Levan Saginashvili (whom Clown resembles).

"The link worked fine for Mr Forbes.
Or, rather, for his staff members who pressed it."-johnficulnean

Of course it did, dummy. Just like all the rest of your made up stupid shit, they are a figment of your delusional mind, so they always succeed in whatever nonsense you can dream up.

The rest of us live in the real world and so do not have the benefit of reading the content of your all-too-frequent psychotic episodes.

Thanks to Clown for admitting that the link worked quite well.

It was no doubt a catharsis for Clown to admit that Mr Forbes was (as ever) quite correct.