[johnforbes]

Thoughts?

[Clownkicker]

Trump Indicted For Keeping Documents After Being Issued A Subpoena And Then Lying About Them And Obstructing Justice

There, fixed it for you, Dishonestjohn.

Meanwhile, out in Republican Land:
Republican Group Taunts Trump With His Own Damning Words In Fox News Ad

“Donald Trump likes to talk about throwing his political opponents in jail for mishandling classified documents, but he’s the one who stole government secrets from the White House and refused to give them back,” Sarah Longwell, the organization’s [The Republican Accountability Project] executive director, said in a news release. “We’re reminding Republican viewers that he should be held to his own standard.”

"LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!"

Thoughts about holding Trump to his own standard?

[sillydaddy]

The media loves to show the stacks of boxes at Mar a Lago as if every piece of paper in those boxes was a top-secret document.
And Trump haters like Clown eat it all up ..

[Clownkicker]

Trump lovers love to pretend that the stacks of boxes at Mar-a-Lago didn't contain hundreds of pages of classified documents.
And Trump lovers like silly eat it all up ..

sillydummy, the hundreds of pages of classified documents recovered from a Mar-a-Lago bathroom and a storage room with a photocopier is what upsets people, not to mention Trump's obstruction of justice documented by his own lawyers.

The mystery is, why don't even Trump supporters get upset about obstruction of justice when it was proved that he had the documents he claimed he didn't have? Even Trump doesn't deny he had the documents, but somehow you still do deny it and are just fine with his obstruction.

[elklindo69]

Look people.....

It's not fair for us to expect the guy who doesn't understand, science, casinos, adultery and umbrellas to all of a sudden to understand that he should be giving back documents that he is not authorized to have.

[johnforbes]

As Dr Rochelle was recently reminded, the mRNA claims were that those getting the shots would not get covid, spread it, be hospitalized with it, or die from it.

All turned out to be -- sad to say -- false.

Follow the science.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^^ As always, johnforbes seems to be wandering around lostin an intellectual wilderness.

This is his own thread and he can't seem to grasp its topic, even though it is right there in his own thread title.

What we DO know is this thread is not about a Dr. Rochelle, mRNA, vaccines, or even science.

Snap out of it, johnny. Watching non-stop mindless Republican propaganda is enough to disorient anyone.

[johnforbes]

On the same day Hunter sent that WhatsApp message of threats, he was seated in that green Vette.

At the time, he was an addict and doing business overseas.

Is there any security risk when your son is an addict doing business for money and selling influence?

[Clownkicker]

"Is there any security risk when your son is an addict doing business for money and selling influence?"-johnflubs

No. Besides EVERYONE (even you) does "business for money", you moron.

And he wasn't "selling influence."

He was threatening someone. Threatening someone to get money is not "selling influence" by any stretch of the imagination.
You don't have to threaten someone to get them to accept influence that would benefit them.

You seem totally ignorant of how "selling influence" works. But you're ignorant of virtually everything, so we shouldn't be surprised.

[johnforbes]

Wrong.

He was demanding money and explaining what would be done to him, by his father, by those they knew, if they didn't get it.

18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(a)For the purpose of this section—
(1)the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;
(2)the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and
(3)the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or

[Clownkicker]

"18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses"

Everything else aside in your seriously flawed partisan position, what you described is not bribery, dummy, so statues against bribery don't apply. Any actual lawyer knows this. One must commit bribery to be charged with bribery.

"He was demanding money and explaining what would be done to him, by his father, by those they knew, if they didn't get it."-johnflubs

What you describe is extortion, not bribery, dimwit. And it still has nothing to do with Joe.

Take a class already.

[johnforbes]

Clowntroller is utterly wrong, as usual, but amusing, which is unusual.

My staff will cut Clown a check for 5 bucks off Mr Forbes' account at Crédit Mobilier.

[Clownkicker]

In other words, johnforbes couldn't refute a thing in my post.

One would think that he would crack a law dictionary some time and find out just how wrong he is about "bribery" and "extortion."

[johnforbes]

Of course, bribery and extortion were involved.

Common sense points to that, although of course the burden for anyone interested in Lady Justice would be proving that against a system which favors Democrats.

[Clownkicker]

Like johnforbes is actually interested in a lady...

[johnforbes]

Lady Justice is actually quite alluring as depicted in many courthouses.

Of course, for a deeply deviant person such as Clowntroller, he would need a socialist sissy statue.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes only finds her "alluring" because her blindfold reminds him of his submissive days as a 'bottom' during his torrid youth in the Frisco bath houses.

[johnforbes]

Clowntoker seems to be lost in some idiosyncratic imagination of his demented deeds in the torrid tearooms of fetid Frisco.

Normal folks cannot follow Clown's heated, heavy, hedonic, heavings any more than they could his crass, craven, crazy carnality.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, all "normal folks" get that I just made a monkey out of you with my witty comebacks to your dimwitted personal attacks.

Trust me, the ALL understand what I said in simple terms. Meanwhile, you resort to trying to confound them with meaningless and impotent verbal diarrhea.

[johnforbes]

In checking the "Wayback Machine" for the Worldwide Interwebs, there has never been a time when the words "witty" and "Clown" have ever been used in the same sentence

[Clownkicker]

...and they STILL haven't been used in the same sentence. Nobody cares.

But that doesn't refute what I said about making a monkey out of you, does it, dimwit.

[johnforbes]