The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Thoughts on Bill Clinton not being charged with a single thing, but paying Paula Jones 850k?

I think that anyone illegally paying hush money to someone should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Don't you, johnny?

I couldn't tell since, like every internet troll, you never post any thoughts of your own on a topic you pretend is important.

Of course, your threads are never about anything important. Your sole purpose is to destroy America by spreading divisive, unsupported, partisan bullshit and innuendo targeting the intellectually impotent.

Clown, the man asks a question you don't like ..so you accuse him of destroying America??

I answered his question, dummy, which is more than he did. It's also more than YOU did, you gutless partisan weasel.

My answer to his question proves to you that I have no problem at all with the question. Why you would say I "don't like" it is baffling. Only an idiot would draw that conclusion from my quite reasonable answer.

I accused him of destroying America precisely because that's what he's doing with his partisan trolling while refusing to hold his own party clowns to the standard he pretends is good for America. He doesn't actually care what's good for America or he would have answered his own question first.

johnny is just another Trump-supporting hypocrite, sillydummy.

And so are you.

Alas, any payments Trump made were not illegal, and even the partisan FEC said no charges were appropriate.

Sadly, Clown's mood has gone down more than a Clinton intern.

So why are you starting such a pointless partisan thread, dimwit.

If Trump broke no law, he won't be indicted, will he.

Sadly, johnforbes' dishonest intellect is limper than a soggy cigar in a Clinton intern.

The old saying is that a clever prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich.

The grand jury proceedings are secret, so rumors swirl, but supposedly only 5 or 6 main documents were submitted to them.

If Bob Costello is telling the truth, and he submitted 330 pages of fairly clearly exculpatory material, then the jury should see and consider that.

Brady v Maryland (1963) held that a prosecutor has to furnish all exculpatory evidence to the defense, and it appears that was not done in the instant case.

The grand jury is in session right now...
But they have been directed to look at other cases and leave the Trump case alone for now...

^^^^^Once again our clueless sillydummy was merely regurgitating propaganda for the dimwitted from his handlers.

Obviously the grand jury continued with the task before them, much to sillydummy's dismay.

After Trump is fingerprinted It will be interesting to see how many cold cases that solves...

The task before the grand jury, with a 95 percent pro-Democrat jury pool, was to try to sop Trump for 2024

johnny, your contempt for the American legal system is well known here.

No need to bore us all with more of your partisan contempt. We've heard it all already.

No, we need a good legal system which actually produces, as Professor Mashaw said, the feeling of having received justice.

The task before the grand jury, with a 95 percent pro-Democrat jury pool, was to try to stop Trump for 2024