The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

I was wondering...

I oftern come hear to visit voyeur web and look at all the women who post there. But I always end up wondering, how many of them know their photos have been posted. How many men post images of their wife or girlfriend without their permission?

I would like to think that all the women know and approve (and want to appear) but I have my doubts.

What do you all think?

Love
Erika

Erika...I don't think I would consider the term "cheating" as the right definition in a case like you describe. Deceitful maybe, not being honest about going behind your SO without their knowledge or permission, but cheating? Cheating, is grounds for divorce. Being deceitful, is one mad-ass wife if she found out and didn't approve of it.

But to answer your question, that probably does happen alot. But in today's world, most women may not be as upset about it as in past times, IMHO.

This is definitely a concern I share. I think it's pretty easy to tell which models are willing and aware and which are not. Ignoring the photos that are 'stolen' from other sites, and the proclaimed 'Ex wife/Ex GF' posts, I'd say about 25% of the remaining contributors are of models that are either posting themselves, or have agreed to let hubby/bf post. About 25% is obviously pics posted without their knowledge or permission and the remaining 50% is too hard to tell. But as the contributor continues to post, over time the likelihood of them being 'legit' increases. I'm referring to the old tit flash section mostly, but it would seem to hold true for Private shots and Free Style also.

The pics I worry most about or of the young girls taking self shots with a cel phone in the mirror and showing her face. Most of them have been stolen from other sites and posted here, but you've got to worry about the girl in the photo. The most likely scenario is that she's been talked into sexting her boyfriend, and he's turned around and posted the photo.

Thanks a lot for answering guys, I would just say that I don't exactly "worry" about this. I was just curious as to what the percentage is perceived to be by others.

I get what you say about young girls and mirror pics there Jammer. Here in spain I know that in class they try to tell girls not to do pics like this... doesn't seem to be working... fortunately :twisted:

Love
Erika

For most young women having photos of her nude body plastered all over the internet by someone else is an embarrassment. But to have her nude photos with her face plastered all over the internet could cause server repercussions for her, and may not fit with the person she wants to be when she is older.

They are trying to discourage teens from sexting here in North America also. I think all that does is encourages them to try it. What they should be doing is explaining the dangers and providing suggestions on how to protect yourself. Teenagers are going to want to explore their sexuality as they make the transition to adults, and this is one way of doing it. Like with sex, it's going to happen...so let prepare the youth with knowledge and ways of protecting themselves. "Don't share naked photos of yourself" doesn't work. "Don't share naked photos of yourself that show your face" might.

Lets talk about the women who cheat, there is huge number of them out there including my wife!

We are surely a long way from the days of Polaroids or home dark rooms as far as erotic photos is concerned. All the photos I have taken and posted of my wife and others has been with their consent as I feel it should be.

Over the whole free side I would bet that 50% are posted without the knowledge of the lady in the photo and going to RC and HC I would bet it's only 10%

I worry less about those photos then the ones taken on nude beaches where the subject doesn't know the photographer and normally didn't know about the photos or give consent. When they go to a nude beach they know that others will see them in a limited way. When there are photos taken of them and posted online it takes their nudity way beyond what they ever intended it to be.

I'm not saying that VW should stop posting voyeur photos, but they should at least blur the faces of these unsuspecting ladies especially since most if not all nude beaches ban photography. It's really no different than someone taking photos in a locker room.

actually i think this topic is a concern and agree with shimmer that vw should blur the faces of the obvious non-consented photos. to post photos of your wife/girlfriend without consent is a grose act of disloyalty and to take photos of a stranger without their knowledge is just wrong but to then plaster it on the web is criminal.
this is the reason why i have not posted my wife on here. she does like to be seen naked but is uncomfortable with photos of her because they can to easily be abused. especially in this digital age. we have heard of quite a few cases where an innocent photo sent to a 'friend' has come back to cause problems for that person. eg, prince harry.
i have many photos of her but she trusts me not to abuse her trust and i have never shown them to anyone without her consent. yes she has consented to a select few. very few i might add.
for me anyway, its far more erotic to watch a lady undress when she wants me to watch than to peek through a window. and its more erotic to show a friend a photo of my wife that she has chosen. to go behind her back would only make me feel dirty.

That's a crucial point redback, the want to factor. I love all the sexy looks and smouldering eyes in the women here, I just suspect they weren't meant for the public.

I do confess Shimmer that the section of what I saw is a little risque for me. I go to nude beaches and I would be absolutely furious if my nude image were published without my consent... especially if I look bad!