The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

353 counties in 29 states had over 100 percent voter registration in 2020.

Thoughts on how?

It's really quite simple, dummy.

You just make up some stupid shit (as your handlers did) and then talk yourself into believing it without demanding evidence to support the assertion, and voila, something made up becomes true to you.

Republicans and Putin have that in common.

Unless there is some explanation in terms of keeping records, it seems that there should not be 353 counties in the US which had over 100 percent voter regis in 2020.

This comes to about 1.8 million extra voters, and it hurts Democrats because people have trouble believing Joe really got those 81 milion votes.

Dems should WANT to explore this, but instead they flee in terror from any inquiry into election integrity.

"Unless there is some explanation in terms of keeping records, it seems that there should not be 353 counties in the US which had over 100 percent voter regis in 2020."-johnfibs

I just gave you the explanation, dimwit.

You made it up.

Alas not.

As always, my posts are rooted in fact, grounded in common sense, and aimed at helping Clowntoker raise his gaze above and beyond his Marxist blather.

Alas you did.

As always, my posts are rooted in the fact that johnforbes simply regurgitates lies without any evidence or substance to back them up.

This thread will be no different.

My audit staff has turned its relentless gaze upon this thread.

It has concluded thusly:

"Using GAPS (Generally Accepted Posting Standards) for the past fiscal year, the postings provided by the esteemed Mr. Forbes have been overwhelmingly rooted in fact, grounded in common sense, and aimed at helping Clowntoker raise his gaze above and beyond his Marxist blather."

"As always, my posts are rooted in the fact that johnforbes simply regurgitates lies without any evidence or substance to back them up.
This thread will be no different."-me

See? This thread is no different. Not a shred of evidence from dimwit johnny.

That is tantamount to an admission that he simply made it up.

PolitiFact does "fact checking" for the Left by saying all leftist nonsense is valid.

On this forum, my staffers use ForumFactCheck to ascertain validity.

Based on my 84 years online, and the 13,180,100 posts, ForumFactCheck assigns Mr. Forbes a 99.99998 percent accuracy rate.

johnny, my name is not "Mr. Forbes"

As far as "accuracy" goes, you have still not posted a shred of evidence for anyone to check for the claims you make.

'Nothing at all' is not an accurate post, dimwit.

If you have no evidence for the things you believe, then all you are is just an ignorant asshole yammering on mindlessly.

It is true that Clownslacker is not Mr Forbes.

In fact, Clown posts as he might had he had less education, undergone two cerebral aneurysm repair surgeries, and had his brain erode to the consistency of green Jello.

Sure, johnny, whatever you say.

And you post like a childish, lying, partisan asshole.

We all have our failings that are beyond our control. It's just the way you have always been, much to your mother's chagrin.

Clown sure does look like a girl.

But then I'm not a biologist.

^^^^^^^Once again we see Dishonestjohn desperately trying to distract from his inability to support his lies with any evidence by admitting his gross ignorance and his perverted attraction to girls.

For a so-called dude, Clown does look like a lady,

But then I'm not a biologist.

Yes, johnny, you aren't a biologist. And you also aren't a lawyer since you never produce any evidence for the nonsense you post.

No judge would ever put up with your partisan baloney for more than about two minutes.

We know this for the same reason no judges put up with Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Taylor Greene, or any other 'Trump election conspiracy' lunatics who have no evidence for their allegations.

They did what any sensible person does----they simply throw them out of court.

Yes, I'm not a biologist.

But then Clown isn't a journalist or a lawyer.

It remains true that no substantive elecction fraud case was ever heard on the merits at the district federal level (probably below either).

Those were dismissals on procedural grounds, and for good reason -- Democrats were happy with the 2020 election result, and Trump-hating RINOs were too.

"It remains true that no substantive elecction fraud case was ever heard on the merits at the district federal level"-johnflubs

EXACTLY, dimwit. There was never any substantive election fraud case to be heard in court, and there was never any merit to the lawsuits filed because there is no evidence supporting ANY of their claims, so they were thrown out of court.

Powell and Giuliani both had opportunities to present substantive evidence in court. The judges asked to see it. They couldn't. They didn't have any. Powell even admitted outright that she didn't have any in the first place. It is the definition of "frivolous lawsuit."

None of Trump's lawyers and toadies EVER had a shred of evidence to support their allegations when the judges asked to see it. Simple as that.

Thankfully, our legal system demands evidence. Sadly, Trump supporters don't.

Trust the science.

PolitiFact does "fact checking" for the Left by saying all leftist nonsense is valid.

On this forum, my staffers use ForumFactCheck to ascertain validity.

Based on my 84 years online, and the 13,180,100 posts, ForumFactCheck assigns Mr. Forbes a 99.99998 percent accuracy rate.

Fat lot of good an accuracy rate like that does you when you can't ever produce a shred of evidence to convince anyone else to your point of view, dimwit.

Hey, wait a minute..... since you retired "Jungle Bunny" are you doing your next drag club character for us? You know, the Story Time Lady in the fairy tale pointed hat reading fabulous fantasies to kids at the childrens' bookstore.

I would advise against that one because, while plenty kinky, it just makes you look like a child predator, johnny.

I just produced an actual video of what certainly appears like an obese gal in Detroit filling out multiple ballots and dropping them in a dropbox on Nov 2, 2020.

No, dimwit, the video doesn't show her "filling out" any ballots. You made it up.

It MAY show her signing the ballots that are already filled out, but you can't prove that's what she's doing. It's just your guess, just like it's your guess that she votes Democrat and not Republican.

And if one of the ballots is her own, then she is doing nothing wrong in that case.

It's only if she actually signed another person's ballot that fraud was committed. But you don't know that, do you, unlike with your latest drag queen character creation of the Story Lady in the gossamer negligee telling tall tales. Your video definitely does NOT show any widespread vote fraud as you allege. It only shows a woman putting a couple of ballots in a drop box, which in itself is not a crime.

Come on, Clown, you saw the video and we both know exactly what she was doing.

And she was doing it the day before the 2020 election.

Come on, johnny, Meadows' double registration in two states is well documented and we both know exactly what he was doing.

And he was doing it before the 2020 election.

As to the woman in your video, you only ASSUME you know what she was doing because you weren't there by her car watching her do whatever it was that she was doing.

The actual evidence against Meadows trumps your partisan assumptions.

But I was surprised to see you criticize a Republican caught doing questionable things to ballots in her car, outside a ballot drop box. You should criticize Meadows as much as you criticize that Republican voter.

Anybody who votes illegally should not get away with it.

My position would apply to anybody, including the King of Siam.

But the entire Democrat push to bring another 1.9 million new illegal aliens in America in 2022, as in 2021, is to have them vote once voter ID is ended.

Meanwhile, you needed a driving license to rend a videotape 30 years ago.

So now you are actually repudiating Republicans Mark Meadows and Donald Trump?

Well why don't you just come out and say it, dummy? Grow a pair already, you gutless partisan weasel.

Forget about Hunter Biden's laptop. Not only was Meadows committing voter fraud....his phone is pretty much ground zero for the insurrection.

Video just released over the weekend shows cops/security waving people in, so what exactly happened on that day (doubtless many different things) must be ascertained.

For all of us who would never go to such an event, it would be interesting to learn just exactly what did happen, but calling it an "insurrection" is absurd because no guns were brought, there was no plan or possibility of even halting the events of that day much less taking anything over.

For heaven's sake, some clown with Viking horns on his head was wandering around, and middle-aged folks were taking selfies in Statuary Hall.

Besides, a year and a half later, Democrats are still trying to making political hay out of it, so clearly Dems wanted to use the demonstration cum riot for political purposes.

"Video just released over the weekend shows cops/security waving people in,..."-johnforbes

No such video was "released over the weekend". You made it up.

But I found the 'Capitol Tour' video you were apparently talking about which you say shows police "waving people in"
What it shows is police waving people OUT, dimwit. When you are being pointed towards the exit door, it's a subtle hint to get out, dimwit. (When at a gathering, clueless johnforbes never did understand when his hosts were trying to get rid of him. He always takes such actions as encouragement to stay.)
https://news.yahoo.com/jan-6-footage-sh ... 43920.html

Yes, of course it was.

Levin ran it, as did other sources.

No such video from this weekend shows up in a search, johnny. Not even when "Levin" is included.

You're thinking of the sixteen-month-old partisan propaganda video that edits out all the violence and destruction those guys committed.

They were not tourists, dimwit. They threatened to hang Pence and Pelosi, broke windows and doors, and attacked officers with weapons inside the Capitol.

You didn't see it because your handlers don't want you to see it. They don't want reality intruding on your simple mind. And also because you refuse to watch any news outside your partisan bubble of lies and dishonesty.

Go figure there is some ex-NYPD cop who just went on trial and claimed that he tackled a Capitol police officer in self defense because.....he was provoked.

It's as if conservatives have gone from "USA, USA, USA" to "Fuck You, America"

In the 1960s, leftists favored free speech like Mario Savio in 1964.

Then came the hippies who said "Fight the Power" and "Don't Obey the Man"

Today, leftists love big government, and love authoritarian control and censorship.

^^^^^^ Look at johnny scurry away when he couldn't produce any evidence of his alleged video that was "just released over the weekend". He made it up.

All he has is another little change-of-subject diversion to try to make people think he addressed the points I made, which he didn't because he couldn't.

No, Mr. Forbes is running TOWARD affirming his prior statement.

Levin did indeed air further video evidence which showed protesters inexplicably being waved in by security.

Why? I have no idea, and it looked very strange, but other such video clips have been floating around for over a year.

Apparently, like a lot of events, different things went on, and they ranged from attempts to kick in doors to protesters simply strolling in and walking right past security guards who did nada to stop them.

Life is full of complexity, and we must embrace it.

"Levin did indeed air further video evidence which showed protesters inexplicably being waved in by security.
Why? I have no idea, and it looked very strange, but other such video clips have been floating around for over a year."-johnflubs

EXACTLY, johnny, he showed you one of the rehashed, edited videos without any context from the rest of the interior violence and of police desperately trying to keep rioters out that day.

This is not news, as you are pretending. With proper selective editing, Republicans can make anything look like whatever serves their partisan, destructive agenda.

And you're wrong, we don't have to embrace the "complexity" of your ilk's Trump-supportive violence. All Americans must repudiate it. Sadly, Trump never will.

Thanks to Clownslacker for admitting that Levin did indeed show video and that it did indeed show people just strolling by security and/or having doors held open for them.

Now let's be candid and admit there were also other incidents, some including violence, and it would be fascinating to know whether those were Antifa members or BLM members or confidential informants or people hopped up on MAGA rhetoric or whomever the heck they really were.

Let the facts come out, let all the security video come out, let the full truth be told, let everybody know what happened so those of us who would never attend such events can learn what the heck happened.

In other words, instead of people debating what happened, let them find out what really happened and then interpret whatever the facts are.

"Now let's be candid and admit there were also other incidents, some including violence, and it would be fascinating to know whether those were Antifa members or BLM members or confidential informants or people hopped up on MAGA rhetoric or whomever the heck they really were."-johnflubs

"Jan 29 (Reuters) - U.S. former President Donald Trump said on Saturday if he were to run for president and win in 2024, he would pardon people charged with criminal offenses in connection with the deadly Jan. 6 assault by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol."

What Trump really means is that even he accepts that these rioters are Trump supporters. Trump does, but johnforbes doesn't. johnforbes is actually here claiming Trump would pardon ANTIFA, BLM for rioting.


"Let the facts come out, let all the security video come out, let the full truth be told, let everybody know what happened so those of us who would never attend such events can learn what the heck happened.
In other words, instead of people debating what happened, let them find out what really happened and then interpret whatever the facts are."-johnforbes

We're doing that, johnny. We have the bi-partisan January 6th Committee. They're doing exactly that. And you criticize them for doing it. You aren't interested in the facts. Every time one is brought to light, you simply deny it and continue to call for people to uncover the truth.

You did the same for the election fraud investigations. No fraud was uncovered by Republican AG Barr. No fraud was discovered by the six month Republican Arizona audit. No fraud was uncovered in any state Trump supporters claim were rife with fraud. No fraud was uncovered by Republican Giuliani or Republican Mike Lindell or Republican Sidney Powell. Yet you persist in claiming there was widespread fraud.

There is nothing anyone can do to convince you what really happened on Jan. 6th. You have watched the video of admitted Trump supporters attacking police and threatening Pence and Pelosi. You have seen Trump supporters plead guilty to seditious conspiracy. Even that won't convince you. You shrug it off. You have seen hundreds of people investigated and charged in the Jan. 6th riots. You have seen hundreds of rioters plead guilty to their crimes. No intelligent person believes these are all ANTIFA and BLM. Oath Keepers and White supremacist groups aren't made up of ANTIFA or BLM members.

If johnforbes would cease his partisan crusade against the Bi-partisan Jan. 6th Committee's work, he would soon have the answers he claims he seeks. But he won't. He will simply continue to claim no one has looked into it, just as he continues to claim no one has looked into his fantasy of "the widespread election fraud of 2020." Many Republicans have looked into it and found nothing. Many Democrats have looked into it and found nothing. No court has found any evidence to support the claims because no one has presented any evidence to any judge when they asked to see it. Exactly who does johnforbes suggest should look into it if he won't accept the findings of wither Democrats, Republicans, or the courts?
But you still stand wide-eyed and dimwitted claiming no one knows what happened that day.

Who should look into it, johnny. Don't be a chickenshit pansy and just tell us who "them" is and whose 'answers' you would accept. Otherwise, just admit there is no one whose word you would accept and stop your mindless droning on this issue.

How would I know who Trump might pardon?

Only he would know that.

So the only person johnforbes will believe on the Jan. 6th Insurrection is Lynn Anderson. And she's dead.

Just like johnny's useless partisan brain.

Please stop using stale Democrat rhetoric like "insurrection."

If there had been any such lunatic notion, wouldn't said traitors have brought plans and weaponry?

Of course, but no such thing happened, and even by that evening when all Democrats were using the same wording it was apparent that Democrats had planned to use the riot for political purposes and fundraising.

For those of us who would never attend such a wacky event, it would be interesting to learn the full, neutral, non-political truth as to what happened.

Why not release all security video and info instead of Pelosi keeping huge amounts of that secret?

How many confidential informants were there, and why, and what did they do, and what the heck did people like Ray Epps do and why were they not charged?

Was this part organic protest, part riot, partly protesters walking in as we can see on video right past security guards, and partly wackos with Viking horns on...what the heck does ALL the information show in a NON-PARTISAN way?

"Please stop using stale Democrat rhetoric like "insurrection.""-johnflippedout

Now johnforbes is calling Webster's Dictionary "stale Democrat rhetoric"
What occurred of Jan. 6th is the very definition of "insurrection" and how do I know? I looked it up, of course. johnforbes should try using a dictionary himself. But I will help the dimwit by doing his homeworl for him and cram some self-improvement down his throat:

insurrection- "a violent uprising against an authority or government."

Even johnforbes admits the riot that day was a"violent uprising" and that it was against "an authority or government".
But for some reason his cognitive dissonance won't allow him to make the leap to applying that clear definition to the rioters trying to keep Trump in office against the properly certified results of the 2020 election. He thinks that by calling it "rhetoric" the definition of "insurrection" that has been accepted for hundreds of years will miraculously change into something favorable to his bizarre partisan "Weltbild." It won't.

"If there had been any such lunatic notion, wouldn't said traitors have brought plans and weaponry?"-johnflubs

They DID, dimwit. They had organized plans, as proven by the two guilty pleas of two of those charged with "seditious conspiracy." (For the dimwitted, "seditious conspiracy" is the making of plans against a government.)

"If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both."

That's what the two men pleaded guilty to. And there are more to come. This is not merely a rhetorical use of the word. It is quite literal. The sooner johnforbes comes to that realization, the sooner he will stop making an ass of himself by regurgitating partisan propaganda from his handlers.

And the rioters DID have weaponry. There were Molotov cocktails. There were guns. There were sharpened flag poles. There were mace and bear spray. There were stun guns. There were baseball bats. There were collapsible batons. There was a "quick reaction team" just outside D.C.. There were also two pipe bombs that were discovered before they went off. Exactly what does johnforbes consider to be weaponry if those things are not weapons to him? Imagine the mental contortions johnforbes must perform each day to convince himself those things are not weapons. Yet somehow he achieves that grotesque feat each morning so that he doesn't have to be appalled at those whose politics are the same as his own, and so that he may continue to whine about how unfair all this is to the violent criminals who attacked our government. No one has any sympathy for your mealy-mouthed whining, johnny.

And just so you can no longer claim to have no knowledge of these things, read this story and watch the videos it contains:
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/19/97787958 ... -they-used

This was an armed insurrection--PERIOD. They even said they wanted to hang the Vice President and Speaker of the House and take hostages, as all the zip-tie handcuffs they brought attest. No partisan twisting of definitions on johnny's part can ever alter that fact.


"Of course, but no such thing happened,..."-johnfibs

Only it DID happen, johnny. Something EXACTLY like that happened. You no longer have any excuse for not knowing it happened. You have the evidence before you, as do the government entities prosecuting these criminals, getting hundreds of guilty pleas from them and many successful prosecutions already.

But at least johnbforbes has now called these Trump supporters "traitors" so that's something. In his case it's the first step to "knowing thyself." One day soon he may look in the mirror and be appalled at what he has become.

Two bozos and a sharpened flag pole would constitute a serious threat to overthrow the country?

Come on, man, even the ice cream soldiers at Fort Myer would defeat that in two seconds.

Be serious, the Democrats saw a bunch of upset folks in Viking horns and MAGA hats, plus an unknown number of agents and confidential informants like perhaps Ray Epps, and decided they would try to make political hay off a bunch of wacky protesters thinking Mike Pence (a swamp creature) would suddenly do something like remand the competing slates of electors to state legislatures?

Nothing of the sort was likely to happen, and anybody sane remained home that day.

Meanwhile, Dems cheered as BLM and Antifa looted and burned across the country in 2020, and Kamala wanted them to get out on bail more quickly, so don't pretend Dems oppose riots.

^^^^^^ You can lead a dimwit to water but you can't make him think.

Look at the dishonest weasel try to distract with BLM, Antifa, and his other "go to" irrelevant nonsense. If johnny can't grasp that the election isn't official until the Vice President you intend to hang counts the votes and certifies the election, then there's no way johnny will ever grasp the seriousness of the Jan. 6th insurrection.

At least dimwit johnny didn't persist in denying there was an insurrection any longer. Sometimes just a little book learnin' can work wonders with the chronically ignorant. Unfortunately, he now insists that an insurrection is not a concern if it is carried out by just a few thousand people armed with deadly weapons.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

In the same vein, you can lead a guy like Clownslacker (with a nose like a horse) to the light of sweet reason, but you cannot make Clown drink deep that Pierian Spring.

Please pardon the reference to Alexander Pope, but it is important to counter the IQ-lowering effect of talking to Clown with a literary reference from time to time.

^^^^^^^^As always, when johnforbes has nothin', he resorts to personal attacks that make him look like the impotent tool he is.

As always, when johnforbes has nothin', he resorts to personal attacks that make him look like the impotent pussy he is.

That was not a personal attack.

Horses do have long noses. It is just a fact.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

In the same vein, you can lead a guy like Clownslacker (with a nose like a horse) to the light of sweet reason, but you cannot make Clown drink deep that Pierian Spring.

Please pardon the reference to Alexander Pope, but it is important to counter the IQ-lowering effect of talking to Clown with a literary reference from time to time.

As I said, when johnforbes has nothin', he resorts to pathetic personal attacks that make him look like the impotent pussy he is.

It is simply a fact that horses have longer noses than humans.

In the same vein, you can lead a guy like Clownslacker (with a nose like a horse) to the light of sweet reason, but you cannot make Clown drink deep that Pierian Spring.

Please pardon the reference to Alexander Pope, but it is important to counter the IQ-lowering effect of talking to Clown with a literary reference from time to time.