The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

It is racist and sexist to ONLY consider black females for the Sup Ct.

Beyond that, Joe's pick seems to be quite a radical leftist. Sure, the Harvard Law Review degenerated long ago into lunacy, but:

"In 1996, Biden's SCOTUS pick, Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote an article in the Harvard Law Review claiming state laws regulating sex offenders are unjust because they become the "target of widespread community rejection, antipathy, and scorn…"

Of course, it's racist..!
But you can't tell the Left that.. why ?
Because she's black and to the Left when it comes to black...two wrongs always make a right..!

The real question is: Should partisan spam-posting trolls be the subject of scorn?

johnforbes is reliable in his refusal to discuss actual important issues here but instead merely regurgitates the daily Right Wing outrage of the day designed to make him blind to what really matters in this country.

Has johnforbes started a thread about the first successful case against an ARMED Jan. 6th insurrectionist? The guy had an illegal sidearm on his hip. No, johnny still insists the Trump supporters were unarmed, and thus (he says) it was not an insurrection, despite the myriad other weapons they wielded which injured over 160 police officers. This case is the first to put the lie to johnny's persistent claims.

Did dishonestjohn start a thread about the first Oath Keeper's guilty plea to the charge of seditious conspiracy? No. It shows Trump supporters for what they are, and johnny doesn't like that, so no thread from him about this serious issue. Those are his people, after all, and he will never admit that his people are violent anti-American seditionists. (Which they are. The first one has admitted it. More will come.)

No, johnforbes would rather post partisan social media gossip instead of actual news stories. He would rather rehash settled election results and cause Americans to further lose faith in our election system. His behavior is indistinguishable from that of a Russian internet propagandist whose job it is to sow disinformation and discord among us, to allow such things as Putin's war crimes to happen. johnny also starts multiple personal attack threads because he is intellectually impotent to make a rational argument. Instead, he presents made up political positions for others because he can't refute someone's actual position, and because he has nothing else to offer beyond his partisan hate.

So yes, the clear answer is that johnforbes should absolutely be the subject of scorn.

After listening to the State of the Union Address by "Patriot Joe"
many liberals are secretly wishing Trump had stolen the election..

Don't be stupid, dimwit.

Already the black woman In the VIEW Sunny Hostin is saying that Putin is a genius for targetting Ukraine's nuclear sites.
It was just the other day this same woman was condemning Trump for saying Putin was a smart leader....
Then there was Elie Mystal , black author who said Biden's State of the Union was a big disappointment
and pointed out Biden has lost half the black support that helped him get the Presidency...