The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Attorneys for the 2016 presidential campaign of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers that were in Trump Tower, and after the election in the White House, in order to create an “inference” and “narrative” to link former President Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham said.

But why did she delete 33,000 emails under subpoena, then BleachBit the server?

Why would any innocent person go to such an extraordinary effort to hide her tracks?

"Why would any innocent person go to such an extraordinary effort to hide her tracks?"-johnflubs

I don't know, johnny. Why would Trump go to such extraordinary lengths to hide his tracks, the way he is STILL doing.

Any ideas?

Why did Trump do a document 'dump' in the White House toilets? And end up with 15 boxes filled with classified documents in Mar De Cloggo?

That place should be an active crime scene...................

Do you actually think the "State of the Union" address was the Only Trump document Pelosi has tore up?

For years, Democrats pushed this Russia collusion nonsense.

Now we know Hillary spied on Trump at Trump Tower and also in the Exec Office of the President.

From what I remember.....Trump was the one who withheld military aid to Ukraine because they wouldn't lie for him.

It's good that we have a president who stands up to Putin.

You remember wrongly.

Pelosi, Romney, Kerry, and Biden all had sons on the boards of Ukraine energy outfits...

Do you really think that we all forgot why Trump got impeached the first time around. Or maybe they just cover that stuff in the right wing media.

As always, gullible johnny fell for all the nonsense his handlers are only to happy to feed him:

"The former president and conservative media [and johnforbes] went from zero to hyperventilating with surprising speed, overlooking all kinds of relevant details. Even putting aside the fact that Durham has an unfortunate habit of presenting provocative ideas that don’t stand up well to scrutiny — which helps explain why news organizations were cautious about pouncing on the so-called “controversy” — in this matter, there’s still no evidence of “infiltration,” “hacking,” or “spying,” all words used by Trump and conservative media this week.

What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton."

Oh well, dimwit johnny will still lobber over this, dutifully repeating lies from his handlers, for another couple years.

The first employer Hillary had right after College, fired her saying she had no ethics...
So she when to Arkansas and married William Blythe, who was hiding under the name
Bill Clinton.
To make a long story short...Problems with ethics have followed these two their entire public lives..

So from what I know Hillary never....

lied to get into college

lied to get out of Vietnam

lied to students at a scam university

lied to donors to for a fake charity

lied to the accountants?

But she did lie about being pinned down by sniper fire...

See? sillydummy admits he is just fine with Trump cheating students out of tuition money and an education, lying about non-existent bone spurs to avoid serving his country, committing fraud by stealing donated money from veterans, shredding White House documents, and committing tax fraud and bank fraud for decades.

But the one thing silly just can't condone is someone harmlessly embellishing a story. Now that's just too much for a delicate flower to bear. Trump's actual documented crimes? Who cares, right?

This is the gross hypocrisy of Trump supporters. They honestly don't care what crimes Trump has committed, just as long as they can be feel smug and somehow be outraged about Hillary over something silly.

I'll issue a change to all of you deplorables out there ....let's go and put Hillary under oath for 11 straight hours for those crimes that were made up by the right wing fringe elements and let's put Trump under oath for 11 straight hours for his actual real crimes and let's go and see who melts straight the fuck down first.

So which one of you deplorable wants to place their wager???

Elkin, that isn't the test and you know it.

Here is a question: Would it be okay to spy on a Democrat president in the White House?

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

And it was wrong and illegal for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House.

"And it was wrong and illegal for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House."-johnfibs

Only it never happened, dummy.

Not even John Durham himself has accused ANYONE of spying on the Trump White House, johnny, let alone accusing Hillary of it.

Why do you persist in lying about this? Why don't you believe Durham, the source of Trump's phony story.

And why are you so gullible?

To be fair to Clown, Hillary has lied about so many things that Clown's frail cognitive structure cannot absorb them all.

Bill Clinton lied to his draft board to dodge the draft and, not to be outdone, Hillary lied about wanting to join the military herself when clearly her enormous caboose could only fit into the circus tent size of Austin's former uniform.

To be fair to johnforbes, Trump has lied about so many things that johnny's frail cognitive structure cannot absorb them all.

Trump lied to his draft board to dodge the draft and, not to be outdone, he had over 10,000 documented lies during his four years in the Presidency.

Yet he still finds the Clintons' behaviors damning even as he continues to support Trump and would, if given the chance, vote for him again in 2024.

The droning dirge of johnny's partisan hypocrisy is exhausting.

Heavens to Betsy, I certainly apologize for any droning dirge fomenting exhaustion.

In my case, I am as fresh as the April rain -- rested, tanned, and prepared for the Ides of March.

Meanwhile, Clown is preparing for the March of Hides as he runs away from the truth.

^^^^^^^^ It's embarrassing to watch johnforbes realize that he's been duped again by his handlers, so he then desperately tries to make people forget how stupid he has been by pretending he doesn't know how stupid he has been.

It boils down to this:

Would it be okay to spy on a Democrat president in the White House?

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

And it was wrong and illegal for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House

It boils down to this:

Would it be okay to spy on a Democrat president in the White House?

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

And would it be okay for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

Fortunately, it never happened, so johnforbes is simply telling lies and carrying water for his handlers.

Not even John Durham himself has accused ANYONE of spying on the Trump White House, let alone accused Hillary of it.

And it was wrong of johnforbes to continue to post his made up stupid shit without any evidence to back up anything he says. He could find himself on the receiving end of a libel lawsuit.

At the end of every wonderful thread, we must pause in the twilight and ask: "What have we learned?"

To summarize:

Would it be okay to spy on a Democrat president in the White House?

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

And it was wrong and illegal for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House

At the end of every thread we must pause and ask: "What have we learned?"

To summarize:

Not even John Durham himself has accused ANYONE of spying on the Trump White House, let alone accused Hillary of it.

And it was wrong of johnforbes to continue to post his made up stupid shit without any evidence to back up anything he says.

He could find himself on the receiving end of a libel lawsuit. A word to the dimwitted...

Is Hillary above the law? Probably so.

Still, at the end of every wonderful thread, we must pause in the twilight and ask: "What have we learned?"

To summarize:

Would it be okay to spy on a Democrat president in the White House?

No, it would be wrong and illegal.

And it was wrong and illegal for Hillary to hire people to spy on Trump at T Tower and in the W House