The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

In an effort to lessen the effect of the Waukesha intentional murders, media outlets were falsely claiming the suspect was fleeing some domestic problem (that was not true) and they were covering up the murders by calling the whole thing a "parade crash."

Really, was that the lingo used by the media for Charlottesville?

Was it really just a "parade crash" or did the killer support BLM (yes), did he rap about hating whites (yep), and describe himself as a "terrorist" (yep)...

"...media outlets were falsely claiming the suspect was fleeing some domestic problem..."-johnfibs

This never happened. The reports said he had been involved in a domestic confrontation right before the assault at the parade. No one pretended he was some sort of victim the way you are lying about it.

"....and they were covering up the murders by calling the whole thing a "parade crash."-johnfibs

No news broadcast anywhere tried to cover up the murders. Not one. Every single mainstream news report I saw or read simply reported everything that was known at the time of the broadcast or article publishing. And every report makes a point of reporting the updated death toll and injury numbers.

You simply made it up and decided to garbage up this forum with more of your moronic partisan lies.

Stop watching your extremely partisan websites, dummy. They are jerking you around.

Your handlers are not your friends.

Wikipedia first sought to whitewash Waukesha's slaughter as an "incident" involving a "SUV crash."

And pretended this moron was fleeing some prior crime and merely happened to run over white people, killing 6 and wounding 60.

Actually, he was a BLM supporter, career criminal, and rapped about hating whites.

Reverse the races, and it would instantly have been a "hate crime" with the civil rights folks at "justice" investigating, but the Waukesha case has vanished.

Anybody who jogs knows Arbury was not jogging, but fleeing. However, the 3 whites were wrong to try to make a citizen's arrest and of course you can't kill somebody who is merely suspected of casing a house for burglary.

As a long-time runner, I have stopped and walked around houses under construction to avoid rainstorms while out jogging, and if confronted I would cheerfully have admitted to technical trespassing with no malign intent, and given my handsome features and undeniable charm would have made friends with those three.

johnny, STOP GETTING YOUR INFORMATION FROM WIKIPEDIA, FER CRIPES SAKE.

Honestly....

And again, I watched two network newscast tonight and again, both covered the story. So much for your lie about a story blackout or that they call it a "parade crash". They didn't. You made it up.

Start getting your news from reputable sources, dimwit. Stop telling us how bad your news sources are. We already know your sources are crappy.

johnforbes wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 3:53 pm In an effort to lessen the effect of the Waukesha intentional murders, media outlets were falsely claiming the suspect was fleeing some domestic problem (that was not true) and they were covering up the murders by calling the whole thing a "parade crash."

Really, was that the lingo used by the media for Charlottesville?

Was it really just a "parade crash" or did the killer support BLM (yes), did he rap about hating whites (yep), and describe himself as a "terrorist" (yep)...

Wisconsin's two senators, Democrat Tammy Baldwin and Republican Ron Johnson, issued a joint statement asking people outside the state not to politicize last weekend's Waukesha tragedy.

"It has come to our attention that outside individuals or groups may attempt to exploit the tragedy that occurred last Sunday in Waukesha for their own political purposes. As the US Senators representing Wisconsin, one from each political party, we are asking anyone considering such action to cease and desist," Baldwin and Johnson wrote.

On Sunday, a red SUV drove through barricades and smashed into crowds of people at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, which is part of the Milwaukee metropolitan area.

Waukesha Police Chief Daniel Thompson said suspect Darrell E. Brooks, 39, was involved in a domestic dispute just minutes before he "intentionally" drove his car into the crowd.

The crash resulted in six deaths: five adults and one child.

It's not immediately clear who the senators' letter is directed towards. They said local officials should be given
"respect and support" with interference as they investigate and sort out the aftermath of the crash and added the investigation should not be made more difficult by a "politically charged atmosphere."

"Their top priority is to begin the healing process within Waukesha by providing comfort and support to surviving family members of the deceased, and those injured both in body and spirit," the senators wrote."

That article is old and its "facts" are wrong.

That police chief (the same guy who was kneeling for BLM last year) was wrong -- that Waukesha killer was not fleeing anything.

He was a BLM supporter who rapped about hating whites and apparently called himself a "terrorist."

This is a hate crime, despite the inconvenient fact for leftist like Elkin that the criminal is black.

White people, and especially their babies or children, deserve to die because they're colonizers, genociders, oppressors, supremacists, racists, etc. living on stolen land. Just ask any "progressive" kook.

And then the whites go out and chant............."you will not replace us"

You just can't make this shit up.

The Waukesha slaughter should certainly be investigated to ascertain whether it was a hate crime.

Of course, it may be that Elkin was one of the Nigerians in the Jussie case...

Every time a black person commits a crime Johnnie will immediately hammer the "character assassination" or the "race baiting" button.

I mean these people can't even go jogging in their neighborhood without getting the shit shot out of them.....fucking unbelievable.

That guy was fleeing the scene, wearing cargo shorts and work boots -- not "jogging."

I am a runner and know what it looks like, with my lean, lithe limbs lambent in the afternoon glow.

Should they have attempted a citizen arrest versus taking a photo of the fellow and calling cops? We both know what the wiser course would have been.

Fleeing what scene Johnnie? The police testified that there was no evidence of any crime. And the medical examiner testified that the victim was wearing "running shoes" not work boots as you just made up.

So you are going to take the word of the three suspects who claim that he was not jogging? Of course they are going to say that he was going at a full sprint because they wanted to give the impression that he was some criminal "fleeing the scene."

As I have said before if he was a white guy then this all never would have happened. This shit ain't rocket science.

Even the shooter himself testified on the stand under oath that none of them witnessed any crime.

And that puts the lie to the "citizen's arrest" bullshit.

No citizen has the right to arrest someone if they didn't see them committing a crime.

johnforbes learned this in his Podunk U Law101 class, but he will continue to argue the case anyway.

Does anyone know the legal term for "frivolous mental masturbation"?

By the way, I run three or four miles in jeans if that's what I happen to be wearing at the time. What exactly does a "runner" look like, dimwit? Yes, all the dummies wearing bike shorts and jock straps look at me funny. But I don't care that johnforbes can't peruse my crotch for his mental masturbation running sessions.

You can see on video he was not jogging, but fleeing.

Were those guys foolish to attempt a citizens arrest? Sure.

Was he foolish to fight? Sure.

Despite the overcharging, a more rational prosecutor could have found something rational to charge.

I've looked through houses under construction, but of course my handsome appearance and charming demeanor permitted different outcomes.

"You can see on video he was not jogging, but fleeing."-dimwitjohnny

When you're black and being pursued by three white guys in trucks, of course you flee, dimwit.

But he wasn't 'fleeing' before he learned he was being followed. He was running, as everyone saw in the video.

But as I said, even though the shooter admitted under oath that he didn't witness any crime, johnforbes is still defending the guy for pretending the shooting was justified because he was making a "citizen's arrest".

Did I call johnforbes' continued dishonesty and ignorance or did I call his continued dishonesty and ignorance...

Yes, he was running but not jogging.

The defense said he was just out jogging.

Well, I've done that for decades and also from time to time taken shelter from rainstorms in houses under construction.

So technically, I've been guilty of trespassing in much the same manner.

He was probably casing the joint for future theft (tools are often valuable and portable), but that is unknown.

He fled the house, and continued obviously when pursued.

The three guys were wrong to attempt a citizens arrest, and should simply have called cops and taken photo/video of him.

Other than that, it was just more overcharging for an event which just shouldn't have played out that way.

To be fair, most of Clown's life shouldn't have turned out to be miserable either, but such are the twists and turns of fate.

It's good of you to finally agree with everything I posted, johnny.

There's some hope for you yet.

But why you continue to blather on about all that irrelevant nonsense about YOU is a mystery. Full of yourself, aren't you.

Yes, if you had been black you would be dead by now for entering a house under construction while out running. What someone (such as yourself) was "probably" doing in the house should not get anyone killed. You are only proving the blatant racism of those yahoos in the trucks. They wouldn't have even questioned what you were doing there, would they.

Much of Clown's life should not have turned out as it did, but then the twists and turns of fate were pretty hard on the shape of Clown's nose too.

I do agree with every word posted previously as profundity by pundit Forbes.

My name isn't "Forbes," dummy, but thanks for agreeing with my posts.

It is true that Clown's name is not "Forbes."

For that to be Clown's name, he would have to be tall, handsome, fit, and undeniably charming.

Alas alack, none of those describe the dismal, depressing, degrading, downers of Clown's dreadful, dreary dreck.

^^^^^^ Even when he has agreed with me completely, johnforbes still feels compelled to distract from his wholehearted agreement with my posts.

What a pathetic partisan weasel.

I agree fully with Mr Forbes, who won me over with his relentless march of logic.

Please point out this alleged paragon of logic, johnny. Is he your father? Your kid brother? Your son?

All we ever see here is you, unfortunately.

You can't even post a simple source, title, date, link, or attributed quotation for the irrational, unsupportable nonsense you continue to blather on about.

Well, you have to understand that Mr Forbes is far too busy to post on the Worldwide Interwebs.

He assignes staffers, gives guidance, and his minions carry the ball.

It is in essence the same way Clown operates -- he gets guidance from the DNC, consults Das Kapital, and starts posting.