The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Democrats loved it when 1.7 million new illegal aliens came across state lines this year.

But, as to Kyle:

"Perhaps the most persistent myth surrounding the case is the idea that Rittenhouse, then 17, brought an AR-15 across state lines. Rittenhouse lived about 20 minutes outside of Kenosha, in Antioch, Illinois. His Illinois residence helped spur rumors that the teenager traveled to Wisconsin with his rifle illegally in tow. But during his trial, Rittenhouse testified in court that he drove himself from his home in Illinois to Kenosha on August 24, 2020, the day before he fatally shot two men. The gun was already being stored at a friend's house in Kenosha, according to police records and court testimony."

Do you have any point, dimwit?

Nothing you have posted makes it okay for a 17-year-old to carry a firearm in WI.

Unless you believe he went with the intent to hunt at the protest.....is that your position?

Sounds plausible, I guess.

They charged him with as much as they could.

Even senile Joe defamed him as a militia member and white supremacist, neither of which was true.

Personally, he was very dumb to go there, and he should have remained home.

But 4 criminals assaulted him and he defended himself within the meaning of the WI law.

There is a great story in the bible where Jesus gives a sermon on the mount armed with an AR-15 just in case if someone just happens to need medical assistance....with Tucker Carlson's film crew who just happened to be tagging along to document this for "historical purposes. "

So Elkin is now admitting that he just didn't know the facts in the Kyle case?

That rifle was not taken over state lines, not that that would have mattered.

Nor did he own the rifle illegally; the prosecutor admitted to the judge that it was legal under the WI statute.

Wisconsin law says that "any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."

So if the state was pressing charges, why as you claim would...the prosecutor admitted to the judge that it was legal under the WI statute.

More likely you just made that shit up.

From what I understand, Rittenhouse could possess a firearm if he were to go hunting or target practice. Unless you can explain how Rittenhouse went to Kenosha to hunt in an empty car lot.

Didn't see a single nigger protest the killing of the two and injuries of the third.
But now that the Jury (who had more evidence than the media) , acquitted Rittenhouse
Now the niggers come out and are protesting "no justice" .. only because they want the
media coverage ..

This will be the look on his face when he finds out about the civil suit that was filed against him....

"Even senile Joe defamed him as a militia member..."-johnflubs

Anyone else notice that johnforbes considers someone 'defamed' if they are in a militia.

And since the 2nd Amendment is about keeping and bearing arms in order to have well regulated militias, johnforbes just said the founding fathers are guilty of defamation.

Why does johnforbes hate the Constitution this way?

As articulated earlier, the cause of action crops up when there is a reckless disregard of knowable facts, and -- as here -- for commercial or political gain.

Joe could have ascertained the facts, but went along with the lazy leftist narrative.