The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Couric, who did the interview, edited out that part of the story in order to portray Ginsburg as more leftist.

Yet more dishonesty from a "journalist."

It's staggeringly unbelievable that johnforbes is so hypocritical that every five years or so he catches a 'leftist' journalist making a questionable editing choice (which happens all the time in ALL journalism) and he sees that as an indictment of the "dishonesty" of 'leftist' journalists. Couric didn't lie about anything, but she made a questionable editorial choice.

Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bret Baier, and a slew of other rightist 'journalists' regularly told actual, verifiable, partisan lies on their broadcasts and johnforbes has no problem at all with it. In fact, he gladly passes on those lies on a regular basis. He does not see this as an indictment of the typical dishonesty of Rightist journalists.

As to questionable Rightist editing choices, FOXnews in particular would have regular exclusive interviews with the President of the United States and the FOX 'journalists' would cut him off (make a questionable editing choice) and not let Trump talk on air any longer because he was making a fool of himself when America inarguably had a right to know how dangerously stupid Trump is.

But to johnfoibles this does not represent the typical "dishonesty" of the rightist journalists he listens to. It's merely reflects the sort of palatable biased journalism he prefers to consume.

What's even sillier about dishonestjohn is that he actually believes anyone needs to be told how liberal or conservative Ginsburg was. It is not news, dimwit. She has a decades-long record of her positions on all sorts of issues. You don't need to listen to Couric interviews to find out about Ginsburg any more than I need to rely on FOX journalists to find out how dangerous Trump is.

I'm sure this revelation of Ginsburg's view of Kaepernick's protest has now fundamentally changed johnforbes entire attitude towards Ginsberg's legal and political opinions so Couric's editing choice is unforgivable to him. (johnny really is that mush-brained.)

Ginsburg later tried to apologize....after being pressured by the powers that be..
Funny how liberals think Americans
will completely erase from their minds what they said by simply apologizing saying they "misspoke"...

The truth is Ginsburg was white and agreed with Trump.

Yep, even if Ginsburg was in agreement with Trump on one small issue, leftist faux-"journalist" Couric rushed in to hide her true opinion.

As to Clowntoker's remarks about my esteemed self, Clown's comments were dumb and disrespectful.

Of course they are disrespectful, dimwit. That's because you deserve no respect. You're a liar and a hypocrite.

And the fact that you couldn't refute a thing I said only shows just how dumb YOU are and that my disrespect for you is well deserved.

Why is the Left always so afraid of the truth?

Apparently sillydummy missed the fact that FOXnews cut Trump off in the middle of an interview because Trump was speaking the truth about his opinions and what he would do. They didn't like that.

Why is the the Right so afraid of the truth?

To quote his leftist heroine Ginsburg, Clown has been both dumb and disrespectful.

Clown I 'm glad that even you believe Trump speaks the Truth...

No, dimwit, I didn't say he spoke the "Truth"


I said he spoke "the truth about his opinions and what he would do. "

He was admitting the embarrassing made up stupid shit he actually believes. FOX didn't want those facts to be expressed over the broadcast because it made Republicans look like the imbeciles they are.

I also appreciate the fact that Clown conceded that Trump had spoken the truth.

No, it doesn't make up for the enormous error Clown made in voting for senile Joe, but hopefully Clown is recovering from his chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Once again hypocrite johnny is supporting regular questionable editing by FOXnews to eliminate important news content while insisting that Couric's once-in-five-years questionable editing record on unimportant content is unforgivable.

Apparently johnny believes his opinion on Kaepernick would have been fundamentally altered if only he knew what Ginsburg thought about it. Dimwit johnny likes to confuse his personal opinions on an issue with free political speech and the rule of law. That is his level of hubris he displays in his delusional self-important world.

I couldn't care less what Ginsburg thought of it personally. Unlike dimwit johnny, I think for myself.

My personal opinion of Kapernick (spelling?) was that he was raised by whites, had an easy path in life as a pro jock, and that his afro became excessive when it would not fit through the width of the average door.

For more detail, I refer you to Clowntoker's own personal web site, suburban_lardbutt.com.