Page 1 of 1
Question of the Day: Who Objected to More States, Dems in 2016 or Repubs in 2020?
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2021 4:02 pm
by johnforbes
The answer is -- drum roll, please -- the Dems.
Re: Question of the Day: Who Objected to More States, Dems in 2016 or Repubs in 2020?
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2021 4:34 pm
by Clownkicker
And they did it after Hillary conceded and allowed for a peaceful and smooth transfer of power.
In other words, they did it because they were concerned about weaknesses in the electoral system, not because they were crybabies.
Trump and his cronies did it because they are poor losers throwing a tantrum, and that's all it's about.
(I mean, besides the obvious fomenting insurrection and domestic terrorism, of course. That goes without saying for Trump supporters. You know firsthand what I mean, johnny.)
Re: Question of the Day: Who Objected to More States, Dems in 2016 or Repubs in 2020?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 10:01 am
by johnforbes
Sure, but mail ballots and Dominion cheatware machines were not at issue then.
As Jimmy Carter concluded, mail ballots are a recipe for fraud.
Re: Question of the Day: Who Objected to More States, Dems in 2016 or Repubs in 2020?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 11:01 am
by Clownkicker
"Sure, but mail ballots and Dominion cheatware machines were not at issue then."-johnfibs
Dummy, you just admitted you lied when you said the issues were similar.
That's the trouble with lying the way you do. You have to keep track of them all and that's impossible.
"As Jimmy Carter concluded, mail ballots are a recipe for fraud."-johnflubs
And we all know in what high regard you hold Carter, you sorry buffoon. You're making a fool of yourself.
By the way, if you are saying Trump is perpetrating some sort of fraud by mailing in his ballot for years, then just say so.
It's always good enough for your guy's fat lazy ass but not good enough for anyone else, isn't it.
Re: Question of the Day: Who Objected to More States, Dems in 2016 or Repubs in 2020?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:44 pm
by johnforbes
Jimmy Carter and James Baker were chosen after the 2000 election to study the matter and make recommendations.
Both of them were sufficiently highminded to weigh in, and they both realized that mail ballots were a recipe for fraud.
I didn't like Carter's policy approach, but I would trust him on such a question, and both Carter and Baker were the sort of people who could become trustees and not steal the proceeds and flee to Brazil.