The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Even for D.C. cynics, the transcripts Schiff had to release were shocking.

Crowdstrike had no evidence the server was hacked.

Clapper, Rice, Lynch, Yates...none of them had even one tiny little piece of evidence of Russia collusion.

Yet Mueller went forward for two years knowing there was no a shred of evidence.

Even worse than no evidence, Gowdy asked people who loathed Trump -- Ben Rhodes, Sally Yates, people like that -- if they had even heard any gossip (not admissible in court) about Trump colluding with Russia.

Nope, none of them even had any gossip.

This entire disgraceful episode was pure lies from Schiff, and CNN and NBC and ABC and CBS helped spread those lies eagerly.

It makes the two years of the Mueller probe a horrible debacle for Mueller's "reputation."

How come Elkin and Clown are not commenting here?

Surely they favor a totally fake two year investigation of the next Democrat president, don't they?

Ironically Trump has gone to the supreme court to block the House from obtaining Mueller's grand jury documentation.

I wonder if Pompeo and Bolton will ever testify?

Why didn't Mueller look into Fusion GPS and the fake dossier which led to his own two years of wasted time?

Because he knew, right from the start, that Clapper and Lynch and Rice and all the rest HAD ZERO EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION.

It was all a Mueller delay tactic to hide Crossfire Hurricane -- the fake dossier used to lie to the FISA court and wiretap Trump.

Why didn't Mueller look into Fusion GPS and the fake dossier which led to his own two years of wasted time?

Mueller was part of the swap, that's why he was picked to run the investigation. There is no way he totally overlooked all the evidence that his own team was fabricating information, lying and leaking, hell they were even bragging about it.

Yes, apparently the goal of Mueller and Weissman was to try to ruin the first two years of the Trump presidency when they both knew, 3 weeks in, that there was ZERO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE THEY WERE INVESTIGATING.

johnforbes wrote: ↑Wed May 13, 2020 6:43 am Yes, apparently the goal of Mueller and Weissman was to try to ruin the first two years of the Trump presidency when they both knew, 3 weeks in, that there was ZERO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE THEY WERE INVESTIGATING.

So if there was "ZERO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE THEY WERE INVESTIGATING" then why is Trump attempting to get the supreme court to block the House from obtaining Mueller's grand jury documentation?

According to Trump only criminals plead the 5th?

Elkin, that is old litigation stemming from Schumer-Pelosi dishonest attempts to impeach.

Please try to keep up/