The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

For all the folks who said "Follow the science," what say ye now?

I still say "Follow the science."

Why? What do you say, dummy?

Fauci and Birx, both with links to the Clintons, just wanted the economy destroyed to hurt Trump in November.

Ruining the economy to stop a flu virus was dumb.

Notice the media reports unemployment as a number , where as before it was always a percentage of the workforce.., Why? because numbers always look scarier...
Even with everything that's going on, I believe, the rate is just over 5%...!

"Notice the media reports unemployment as a number , where as before it was always a percentage of the workforce.., Why? because numbers always look scarier...
Even with everything that's going on, I believe, the rate is just over 5%...! "-fuckingignoramus

The unemployment rate has passed 20% and climbing, dimwit.
https://fortune.com/2020/04/23/us-unemp ... ts-claims/

It's just crazy liberals reporting unemployment as numbers instead of percentages, right, silly? Would 'the liberal media' reporting "20% unemployment" somehow make you feel better? It's not as "scary" to you?

I swear, there isn't a single Trump supporter who has the faintest idea what's actually going on.

johnforbes wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 5:48 pm For all the folks who said "Follow the science," what say ye now?

Ask Trump regarding Hydroxychloroquine....Fox News and the right wing blogosphere seem to have gone silent on this drug.

Clown ..if the unemployment rate was actually 20% and climbing ..
even you would be fighting for scraps in the street...
Don't believe that liberal bullshit..!

Criminy, johnny, put that stupid fucker out of his misery.

He actually thinks "liberals" are trying to somehow minimize the unemployment rate data. He hasn't gotten his latest talking points from his handlers yet.

Slap the shit out of that ignorant Trump supporter with some facts. I don't have the heart to do it any longer. He's just too pitiful.

Elkin must not be aware of that summary of the efficacy of HCQ, with a 91 percent success rate.

HQC still ? course the hospitals are making bank so maybe it's them holding. just like china bred it in a box, no it was the democrats , no it was obama. maybe it was baby jesus eating pizza in the bronx.

hey john you aahh "working" from home or your plushed out think tank cubical?

dangerous fucking bully children and russian operatives. go drink some clorox heros...

My only job is pointing out the mistakes of Clownslacker on the Interwebs.

In the Nevada lawsuit where they summed up the American experience with HCQ, it had 91 percent efficacy, so yes one would still think of HCQ.

As to distancing, the fact is that nobody knows whether it helps or hurts.

WHO said the Sweden model of not locking down was better, and for once the WHO is probably correct.

Study after study has shown very wide asymptomatic spread of covid, which drives mortality rate down almost to that of regular flu.

As more testing is down, that rate will likely end up at -- or below -- that of ordinary flu.

But we destroyed 30 million jobs and created a NEW public health problem.

So Johnnie....are you telling us that social distancing is not working?

Because what do think would have happened if we didn't have social distancing?

Elkin, it is difficult to be patient, but I will try.

We are NOT now at the beginning of this.

The original 6 foot distance thing for spread has been revised in some studies to 60 feet, or perhaps the initial spread was by HVAC systems, there is debate.

In any ideal world, would 6 feet for all be good? Well, sure, but America is not a laboratory.

THIRTY MILLION INNOCENT PEOPLE WERE HARMED BY DESTROYING THEIR JOBS, and a tsunami of mental illness, bankrupty, alcoholism, domestic abuse, etc. is staring us in the eye.

WHO praised the Swedish approach, and perhaps -- when the lockdown debacle is over and analyzed -- America won't make this mistake again.