Page 1 of 1
Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:42 am
by johnforbes
Birx admitted April 7 that all deaths WITH coronavirus would be classified as BECAUSE of it.
We were on pace for a terrible ordinary flu season, but a miracle happened and flu simply halted, or was it because ALL deaths suddenly got put into the covid category?
Re: Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 7:06 am
by Clownkicker
Geezus, johnny, use your head fer cripes sake.
Re: Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 7:11 am
by johnforbes
Just yesterday, they were saying the coronavirus death toll exceeded the Vietnam figure.
But did it?
The typical coronavirus death was 79 to 80 years of age, massively obese, and diabetic.
That is, a person who died WITH the virus, perhaps not BECAUSE of it.
Other nations didn't count this way, and we shouldn't have either.
Re: Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:27 pm
by elklindo69
Johnnie....now you sound like Jared Kusher...arrogant and stupid.
Re: Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 10:01 am
by RealJustme
Birx admitted April 7 that all deaths WITH coronavirus would be classified as BECAUSE of it.
Not only that, the CDC has put out guidance that anyone who dies with Coronavirus type sysmptoms be classified as Coronavirus death, even if the person never tested positive for it.
Re: Why the Novel Coronavirus Death Total is Inaccurate
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 12:11 pm
by johnforbes
Elkin, Kushner has MBA and JD degrees, so in that sense you are correct.
However, Kushner's IQ is 75 points higher than Elkin's.