The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

So Zoe says that anybody who wants to testify can, regardless of whether Trump wants to claim exec priv.

Where on earth do Democrats get such people?

It would be the info, not the person, which would be important, and the individual could not decide.

And Nadler said today that no witness said impeachment was not valid here, but of course Professor Turley said just that although presumably Nadler was sleeping after doing his once-a-year situps.

johnforbes, shallow thinker.....if you believe he's actually thinking at all.

Meanwhile, I wonder what johnforbes thinks about Lindsey Graham as a deep thinker when he said in 1999 that something does not need to be a crime in order to fall into the "high crimes and misdemeanors" intention of the Constitution.

And then there is the deep thinking of Mitch McConnell who said in 1999 that of course there should be witnesses in an impeachment trial.

Both of these paragons of virtue and Constitutional erudition aren't criticized at all by johnforbes for their deep thinking.

Hey, I'm practically Oliver Wendell Holmes compared to Zoe Lofgren.

Zoe says that anybody who wants to testify can, regardless of whether Trump wants to claim exec priv.

Where on earth do Democrats get such people?

It would be the info, not the person, which would be important, and the individual could not decide.

And Nadler said today that no witness said impeachment was not valid here, but of course Professor Turley said just that although presumably Nadler was sleeping after doing his once-a-year situps.

More likely you are the gay version of johnholmes compared to Zoe Lofgren.

Okay, that one was amusing.

johnforbes wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:38 am Okay, that one was amusing.

Is that what they say when you drop your pants?

Elkin, your gay bath references are lost on the rest of us.

Please remember, your own deviant, demented deeds are just your dark and dastardly direction.

The rest of us are normal and here to discuss politics.

What are you talking about Johnnie?

Why do you interpret every thing through gay lenses? My comment was gender neutral.

Maybe you should take a reading comprehension class.

Zoe...looks like actor Vic Tayback in drag...!

sillydaddy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 4:18 pm Zoe...looks like actor Vic Tayback in drag...!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Guve7Y856kY

^^^^ I bet that makes sillydummy sorry he brought it up.

Oh, those wacky Republicans and their obsession with drag. I swear, half the Republicans in America are probably closet cases.

I don't think Zoe is fucking around, though...
She actually looks that way...!

You're talking about Rudy, right? He "actually looks that way", as we see in the video.

He looks EXACTLY like actor Vic Tayback in drag...!

You stepped in it again, silly.

My staff members are assigned to read every posting on the Interwebs every morning.

Today, they selected this gem:

So Zoe says that anybody who wants to testify can, regardless of whether Trump wants to claim exec priv.

Where on earth do Democrats get such people?

It would be the info, not the person, which would be important, and the individual could not decide.

You're talking about Rudy, right?

Clown where in my posts did I not make it clear who I was talking about?

Clown are you retarded or just like to "act" that way?..

^^^^^^^ Zzziinnnnnggggg, right over his head....again.