Page 1 of 1
No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:06 am
by johnforbes
There is no "whistleblower."
This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.
1) He is a registered Democrat.
2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).
3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.
Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.
No quid, no quo.
Re: No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:42 am
by elklindo69
1: LIE
2: LIE
3: LIE
Three steaming piles of bullshit...

Re: No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:55 am
by Clownkicker
I wonder, if I throw another can of Alpo out the back door, will it shut up the incessant impotent yapping from our snarling mutt on the choker chain?
Re: No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:35 pm
by johnforbes
There is no "whistleblower."
This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.
1) He is a registered Democrat.
2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).
3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.
Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.
No quid, no quo.
Re: No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:24 am
by Clownkicker
johnforbes is too stupid to understand that his post contains nothing at all to "verify" that there was "No quid, no quo."
johnny's post doesn't even address the contents of the call. All he can do is make an irrelevant attack on the whistleblower for gathering intelligence and passing the intelligence on to authorities in accordance with the whistleblower law, as the IG reported.
Regardless, whether there was or was not a quid or a quo, we can all agree there was no "pro" involved in that phone call. That's what we get when we install an incompetent amateur in an important job.
Re: No Quid Pro Quo -- Verified
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 5:43 pm
by johnforbes
Clown should chew his cud over the plain fact that there is no quid and no quo.
There is no "whistleblower."
This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.
1) He is a registered Democrat.
2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).
3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.
Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.
No quid, no quo.