The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Yep, just more partisan nonsense from the Left.

So Johnnie.........who's Trump's new fixer now that Cohen is in prison?

No idea.

Every person with money, from Clinton to Obama to Trump, has people working for them.

Not everybody is a failure like young Elkin.

Well Johnnie....apparently Trump doesn't seem to be able to do the dirty work.

And now the shit is hitting the fan....

If you know any president who doesn't have a staff, please advise.

Clintons and Obamas always hid their trail via staffers.

Or cutouts like Fusion GPS and the Perkins law firm, which was how Hillary paid for the fake dossier used to lie to FISA judges and wiretap Trump.

You see Johnnie....it's all cute and fun and games until your Ukraine shakedown scheme blows up in your face and your mob fixer lawyer is in jail and you have to end up hiring some incompetent fuck up TV lawyer....

LMFAO!!!

"..And the skies... are not cloudy ...all daaay..!!
Everything all goes Elk's way in fantasyland....

Elkin is indeed in a fantasy.

There was no shakedown because Ukraine didn't even become aware of the foreign aid billion until a month later.

However, Biden did indeed engage in a shakedown, and a quid pro quo, when he demanded the prosecutor investigating his son's crooked company be fired.

I wonder who will get the steaming bullshit of the year award?

John Forbes
Rudy Ghouliani
Gym Jordan

Previously, the whistleblower form mandated direct knowledge -- not gossip.

Everybody knows that hearsay is not allowed.

This entire whistleblower event was planned and staged.

Just last month, the Intelligence Community Inspector General revised the protocol allowing the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower.

Brennan and/or his pals?

"Just last month, the Intelligence Community Inspector General revised the protocol allowing the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower."-johnflubs

Wow, just in the nick of time to expose Trump's crimes, huh.

As a citizen I am extremely grateful. I like to know when my President is committing crimes, and I don't really care how such crimes are exposed.

I was just fine with "Deep Throat" exposing Nixon's crimes too.

Previously, the whistleblower form mandated direct knowledge -- not gossip.

Everybody knows that hearsay is not allowed.

This entire whistleblower event was planned and staged.

Just last month, the Intelligence Community Inspector General revised the protocol allowing the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower.

Brennan and/or his pals?

Now Johnnie's pot of steaming bullshit is starting to boil over and it's stinking the whole place up.

I think it's safe to say that Johnnie is a few sandwiches short of a fucking brain.........

The IG has now admitted the form was changed BECAUSE of this whistleblower -- that is, to permit gossip against Trump.

So much for the neutrality of the IG.

As a citizen I am extremely grateful. I like to know when my President is committing crimes, and I don't really care how such crimes are exposed.

I was just fine with "Deep Throat" exposing Nixon's crimes too.

Perfectly legal technicalities you happen to disagree with that are within the power of the IG do not excuse the fact of the crime committed. Trump should not skate free just because the playing field has been leveled to allow a fight with the most powerful man on the planet.

johnforbes desperately needs to return to law school to learn the difference between "laws" and "regulations".

CNN reported this morning , some Demo Representatives (and named names), are already having their doubts
about supporting impeachment....looks like just ordinary news reporting, right..!
No this is so the libertard mob can aim their intimidation tactics on these folks thru social media...
and I bet Chuckie and Nancy will be having a heart to heart with them soon...

There's something that I need to clear up here.....Trump’s legal strategy is to release evidence of his crimes and then pretend his crimes are not crimes and then send his goons on cable tv to say his crimes are not crimes.

The Demos believe beating Hillary was a crime..
that is what this whole impeachment thing is about...!

Well Silly....it looks like your compatriot gun toting Confederate wannabe nincompoops are threatening to start a second Civil War to keep a draft dodging Yankee in power because that's how racism works....I suppose.

Elkin, let me tell you what you should do if you had any respect for democracy or the law.

You should work to defeat Trump in the 2020 election, and do that in an honest and legal way.

Don't hide behind a fake dossier or some rumor-monger pretending to be a whistleblower.

johnny, someone can work to defeat Trump in the 2020 election and still support impeaching a President for high crimes and misdemeanors.

If you have any respect for democracy or the law, you don't show it by simply ignoring the Constitution until election day arrives.

Oh no, I don't ignore it.

Dems do.

George Mason and Madison argued as to whether the Euro model of "no confidence" should be in our Constitution, and eventually it was correctly decided not.

Dems don't like Trump, so they want to undo the 2016 election when they should be working to win in 2020.

So Dems don't believe in the Constitution.

johnny, the intelligence community inspector general determined there is "credible" evidence that Trump has violated the law.

Regardless of your partisan bias, you need to take that seriously. It needs to be looked into by Congress. Otherwise the concept of Constitutional checks and balances is meaningless.

If you don't support the inquiry into these "credible" allegations, then you're mistaken. You ARE the one ignoring the Constitution.

Schiff says all the evidence they need is in the phone call transcripts provided by the WH ...
Then why the strong arm tactics of subpoenas ..?!
and threating Pompeo.?
If all the evidence is there already, then the House should take a vote...
Maybe , they don't have the votes, like they claim, eh..!

silly, you need to learn the difference between a rhetorical soundbite on TV and a procedural legal determination.

If you come to a legal conclusion without doing an actual investigation into the witnesses, then a conclusion cannot be credible. To get any witnesses from the Trump Administration to show up, you need to subpoena them. Beyond that, you use "strong arm tactics" because you are dealing with thugs and henchmen.

You subpoena the witnesses so they can't refuse to show up for questioning in a lawful inquiry. Everyone knows that.
And you of all people should know that Trump and his cronies NEVER cooperate with anyone willingly.

You should have johnforbes explain the importance of interviewing witnesses to all you Trump supporters.

So much Bullshit from Clown..
I'm having to wear waders..!

So quote the part that isn't true, silly.

Then make an argument to support why you think it is untrue.

I'll take a month long vacation to some Pacific Islands while I wait for your response.

There's nothing in the Constitution about some IG for "intelligence" people.

Bring forth the witness, have him testify under oath and undergo cross-examination, then I'll take this seriously.

Until then, he/she is a coward seeking to undo the 2016 election based on gossip.

The whole thing is beginning to unravel right before shifty Schiff's eyes...!
It appears Shiff may have created the whistleblower..along with a fake transcript of the President's call...
No wonder he wants to protect the "whistleblower's" identity
by saying all the evidence is already in their hands..
All the bullshit about needing other witness is just that …

Now we know why a very, very partisan attorney worked on this.

This CIA leaker took his complaint to Schiff, and Schiff has already lied saying otherwise.

NY Times reported that the people orchestrating this entire fiasco were Schiff and his staffers.

And johnfibs lied when he said Schiff met with the whistleblower before filing the complaint. They didn't meet.

Stop lying, johnny. It's revolting.

They probably did, but the "before" part is not yet known.

What is clear is that Schiff lied all along, and that all along this was a planned, coordinated attempt to concoct a whistleblower complaint out of mere gossip.

Any sane Democrat would apologize for such an obvious, seedy, illegal leak of classified info.

No sane Democrat would apologize for a leak of classified info that didn't occur, dimwit. There was no leak. You made it up.