Page 1 of 1
"no direct knowledge"
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 3:18 pm
by johnforbes
I'm not a journalist, but was curious who the whistleblower was, where he worked, what he knew, how he knew it.
So I read the CNN story, and CNN admits the so-called whistleblower had "no direct knowledge" of the purported event, but had just heard rumors in the intel community.
So there are zero facts, but "news" outlets have nattered on for days about it, and even hoped for impeachment because of this fact-free rumor.
Question: Brennan?
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 3:32 pm
by RealJustme
It probably is Brennan, but who ever it probably has Obama begging them to stop shining a light on something he wants to remain in the dark.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 5:45 pm
by elklindo69
I'll bet John Forbes low two figure net worth that those transcripts never see the light of day.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 3:44 pm
by johnforbes
If you knew how much I've already paid just in estimated tax this year, you'd be shocked.
For that matter, I am.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 3:53 pm
by elklindo69
I wonder if today is the day that Trump finally became the POTUS.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:16 pm
by johnforbes
I wonder if this is the day that Elkin finally slipped over the edge into complete lunacy.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:24 pm
by elklindo69
Today is the day that President Donald Sharpie is shitting cinder blocks right now and it's wonderful day in the neighborhood...
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:44 pm
by johnforbes
This one of those rare days when I agree with Elkin that Pelosi should proceed with impeachment.
This will hurt Dems, so I support them going ahead.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:05 pm
by elklindo69
President (Democrat) got a blowjob in the Oval Office & lied about it...
Lindsey Graham: Impeachment!
President (Republican) extorted another nation for personal gain....
Lindsey Graham: Sad...time to move on.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:08 pm
by johnforbes
No, it was Biden (NOT the president) who extorted Ukraine, and his son got at least 3 million dollars for it.
Yes, the kid with the coke problem Hunter.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:20 pm
by elklindo69
Johnnie...what is it with you and your steaming piles of nonsensical bullshit. I'm not really getting it. This matter has been adjudicated in Ukraine because there was no evidence of wrong doing on the part of Hunter Biden.
Why is it that you go around making up stupid shit in order to cover for Trump?
Have you ever figured that the guy who ran 5 casinos into the ground and multiple others would eventually run his presidency into the ground?
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:45 am
by johnforbes
No, it was Biden (NOT the president) who extorted Ukraine, and his son got at least 3 million dollars for it.
Yes, the kid with the coke problem Hunter.
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:02 pm
by elklindo69
Johnnie...what is it with you and your steaming piles of nonsensical bullshit. I'm not really getting it. This matter has been adjudicated in Ukraine because there was no evidence of wrong doing on the part of Hunter Biden.
Why is it that you go around making up stupid shit in order to cover for Trump?
Have you ever figured that the guy who ran 5 casinos into the ground and multiple others would eventually run his presidency into the ground?
Re: "no direct knowledge"
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:34 pm
by johnforbes
No, it was Biden (NOT the president) who extorted Ukraine, and his son got at least 3 million dollars for it.
Yes, the kid with the coke problem Hunter.