The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

hristine Blasey Ford’s attorney admits part of Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh were motivated by Ford’s support of abortion & Roe v. Wade.

You're saying that like it's a bad thing, johnny.

You just don't get it. Many abused women need a strong motivation to come out in the open and face scumbags like you who shame the victim instead of condemn the perpetrators. Otherwise they can repress their pain forever and their abusers get off scot free. But when their silence allows another violation of even more women, then they might find the strength to face the male chauvenist pigs like you who think raping women is no big deal. Why do the women get so upset? you wonder. Boys will be boys, after all, right?

That you think there is something wrong with a woman being driven by her personal beliefs to finally speak up shows exactly what kind of person you are. You think people should only do the right thing out of some altruistic convictions? That's idiotic. That's johnforbes.

So Ford was upset of what may or may not have happened to her when she was 15 years old...and so
She decided it was in the best interest of the country to deny Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court?
Ford was used by the Democrats ...nothing more.!

I've felt abused by Clownslacker's serial stupidity for 73 years on this forum.

You don't see me whining to the Congress about it.

I suppose that it was a good thing that Brock Turner was just a privileged white man who raped some unconscious lady in an alley behind a dumpster and not, a black guy who was selling loose cigarettes on a street corner....

Well.....because there are some serious consequences for that shit.

"I've felt abused by Clownslacker's serial stupidity for 73 years on this forum.
You don't see me whining to the Congress about it."-johnflubs

If you saw me nominated to the Supreme Court you would be whining to Congress about it, johnny.

And for your information, given how hypocritical and ignorant you are, scuzbag Kavanaugh was being nominated to the Supreme Court.

No, the modern Supreme Court is just a political body.

Thus, I would not oppose Clownslacker's nomination to fill one of the liberal seats.

Look at Sotomayor, who had standard speech material praising herself for her accidents of gender and ethnicity, and claiming they gave her special insight -- i.e., she was nominated because of her sexist and racist views.

Now, as to the Court generally, the Marbury case revealed that it was all about power, and no less a luminary than Frankfurter said in the Harvard Law Review that the reasoning therein was -- as he so politely put it -- not "impeccable."