The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Apparently AOC doesn't know the Bahamas isn't a U.S. territory and feels Trump golfing as part of his physical activities is just wrong. She's the gift that keeps on giving.

AOC is too young to remember that Barry Obama took government planes long distances to Hawaii to golf.

The UN is trying to guilt trip America into not only helping those in the Bahamas, but also rebuild it. In the mean time the UN has committed $500K to aide while the EU yawns and says it's not their problem. The 500K the UN has offered won't pay for their meeting (party) costs to discuss the crisis.

Perhaps the Clintons could step in to "help" just as they "helped" Haiti, while lining their own pockets.

DISNEY digging deep into its pockets and coming up with at least $1 MILLION for the Bahamas..WOW .!!
Such generosity ..GOD bless them!

Hum, I wonder if that will be written off as "good will" or "advertising"?

Disney needs plenty of money to hire more Left Wing people for Fox News, along the lines of Juan Williams, gay Shep, or Trump haters Neil Cavuto and Chris Wallace.

"DISNEY digging deep into its pockets and coming up with at least $1 MILLION for the Bahamas..WOW .!!
Such generosity ..GOD bless them!"-sillydummy

Let's see-- $1 million-- 389,000 people in the Bahamas. That comes to almost $300,000 per person, right, sillydummy?
It's not as good a deal as the $115 million you think each Dane would get for Greenland, but it's still a lot, right?


Leave it to a conservative knucklehead to ridicule a company for giving a million dollars to charity.

I wonder how much the Trump Organization has given to the Bahamas relief? Care to venture a guess, sillydummy?
No, of course you don't.

Let's see-- $1 million-- 389,000 people in the Bahamas. That comes to almost $300,000 per person, right

No Elk it doesn't, hate to break it you but it's less than $3.00 a person. Why are liberals so bad at really basic math and economics?

I guess RealTool really taught you a lesson, sillydummy. He even agreed with me that conservatives like you are really bad at basic math.

(Thanks, Tool, you fell for it again.)

Now clown is disowning his own posts.

I don't disown my own posts, you moron. What you are is too stupid to get the joke. That is, you're a typical conservative.
I own my posts. I intentionally played you and succeeded in exposing your hypocrisy and stupidity.

"Denmark has a population of less than 6 million...and Greenland has a population of 50K...
Let's say the US offers them $700M...that's approx. $115+ million for each and every person in Denmark.."-sillydummy Tue Aug 27, 2019 11:09 am

As a joke, I did exactly what sillydummy did, and you said "Why are liberals so bad at really basic math and economics?"
But for some reason all you hypocrites couldn't be bothered to point out the poor education of your own. You included, Tool. None of you saw the ignorance in sillydummy's post. You all still think his arithmetic is correct.

But you fell for it this time and criticized his particular kind of stupidity because I pretended to be as stupid as a conservative actually is.

Thanks again for helping me expose you all, Tool.

My high school was so rural that the only calculating method we had was an Ishango Bone

What you are is too stupid to get the joke...I pretended to be as stupid

So was it a joke or pretending to be stupid?

Yes, Tool, it was a joke and I pretended to be as stupid as you.

Is that clear to you yet or do I need to repeat it a few times to penetrate your substandard English?

If I ever had said something totally stupid and false, clown wouldn't accept that I was only joking once busted with the facts. Clown you got busted, just man up and accept it.

Tool, there's a difference between you and me. You regularly say stupid things because you are ignorant and dishonest, so it is clear you aren't joking. You even support Trump in his tripling down on his Alabama bullshit without irony.

I never say stupid things EXCEPT as a satire on conservative stupidity. I use your own words against you (as I did with sillydummy above) in a way that forces you to criticize what I said, which is the same as getting you to criticize what YOU or silklydummy or johnforbes said. It's hilarious. Do you understand NOW?

You hypocrites let every conservative stupidity go, but if a liberal says the same thing, you jump right on it. That's how we all know you are dishonest scumbags without any principles. I get you to betray yourselves in front of everyone including your own partisan weasels.

It is 51 F and a mist is rising off the lake.

On such a lovely September morn, I'd like to thank Clown for mentioning my name in such a wonderful way.

johnny, if you ever need another glowing testimony to your character as a hypocritical partisan weasel, feel free to call on me.

I'm always delighted to be of service.

You even support Trump in his tripling down on his Alabama bullshit without irony.

Are you saying Trump shouldn't believe NOOA?

The agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Trump in the ongoing controversy over whether Alabama was at risk of a direct hit from Hurricane Dorian.

In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would “most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated.”

Tool, you misunderstood the release from NOAA. You are only offering an interpretation of the release that is inaccurate and doesn't reflect reality.

Instead, take a look at the facts:

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2019/D ... e_and_wind

Notice that Alabama was never in any forecast cone drawn by the NHC.

It's simply a fact right from the horse's mouth and now in front of your eyes. Further lies on your part (or Trump's part) are pointless.

RealJustme wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 8:22 am

You even support Trump in his tripling down on his Alabama bullshit without irony.

Are you saying Trump shouldn't believe NOOA?

The agency that oversees the National Weather Service has sided with President Trump in the ongoing controversy over whether Alabama was at risk of a direct hit from Hurricane Dorian.

In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would “most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated.”

Friday's NOAA statement, attributed to an unnamed spokesman and released just before 5 p.m. Friday,

Why don’t any republicans care that Trump is such a loser that he took a sharpie to a weather forecast to doctor it, and that he’s such a dumbass that he thought we were all dumb enough to be like “yeah, OK that sharpie job thing looks totally real,” and then doubled down a dozen more times?

Tool, you misunderstood the release from NOAA. You are only offering an interpretation of the release that is inaccurate and doesn't reflect reality.

Really, let me read it again.

In a statement released Friday afternoon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated Alabama was in fact threatened by the storm at the time Trump tweeted Alabama would “most likely be hit (much) harder than anticipated.” ”

Nope, I understand it. NOAA clearly said Trump was correct.

Nope, you clearly DIDN'T understand it. Tool, you moron, that was NOT the release from NOAA. That is your handlers telling you what too think. Being an imbecile, you didn't even notice that they didn't quote what NOAA said.

What someone from NOAA actually said was "The Birmingham National Weather Service's Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time."

It does not say that Alabama was ever in danger in any actual forecast scenario.

What you posted is from your handlers telling you what to think. It is NOT what NOAA said. You need to learn the difference between your handlers and NOAA. Or any other news source for that matter.

Let me clarify given my Ph.D. in weather science from the University of Yahoo.

Alabama is ALWAYS at risk of a storm.

johnforbes wrote: ↑Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:59 pm Let me clarify given my Ph.D. in weather science from the University of Yahoo.

Alabama is ALWAYS at risk of a storm.

And so is every single state in the nation Johnnie....

So what's your point?

My point is that my point was correct.

Also, given my doctorate in Weather Stuff from the University of Yahoo, you should show some respect.

No it wasn't Johnnie...you were making up more stupid excuses for Trump's batshit idiocy.

The only thing Trump had to do was to defer to the government agency weather reports....but he had to go and make up some stupid shit...like...claiming that Alabama was going to get hit by the hurricane.

Then the NWS corrected Trump a couple of hours later by saying that Alabama WAS NOT going to get hit.

And Trump being the turd who can never be proven to be wrong had to double down on his steaming bullshit. As a corollary, I think it's safe to say that President Email Lady wouldn't be arguing with a map.

Nobody can challenge my expertise in Weather Stuff.

My doctorate in Weather Things is from the Ivy-covered University of Matchbook Cover.

I'm pretty sure that President Email lady would not be arguing with a weather map....

Hillary would have paid Fusion GPS for her own partisan weather map.

Then gotten crooked agents to let her off with a fake investigation.

Then used the fake map to lie to FISA judges and get warrants to wiretap Trump.