Page 1 of 1

quality of pictures

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:46 am
by ols4onon
This is certainly no complaint about current people sending in pictures, but I think this whole fiasco has turned the clock back several years. If you dont agree, just look at the Hall of Fame pictures and tell me that any of the new pictures would hold a candle to the Hall of Fame pictures?

Re: quality of pictures

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:40 am
by VWSupport
Looking into this now, will let you know when I find out why this is happening for some photos and how we can fix it.

Re: quality of pictures

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:52 am
by rugrollers
Kiki wrote:Looking into this now, will let you know when I find out why this is happening for some photos and how we can fix it.
I think what he means is that VW is not getting the quality of submissions since the meltdown that they were getting before. Of course, HoF will be the cream of the crop, so not a fair comparison. But it is also hardly surprising that many of the best contributors might still be waiting to see how things develop.

Rug Roller

Re: quality of pictures

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:19 pm
by VWSupport
rugrollers wrote:
Kiki wrote:Looking into this now, will let you know when I find out why this is happening for some photos and how we can fix it.
I think what he means is that VW is not getting the quality of submissions since the meltdown that they were getting before. Of course, HoF will be the cream of the crop, so not a fair comparison. But it is also hardly surprising that many of the best contributors might still be waiting to see how things develop.

Rug Roller
Ah, I see your original point, I thought you meant there was something wrong with the images. Yes, the photo quality is out of our control. As there are no professionals on here sometimes the photos do not look perfect or the camera they use is not of the best quality, but that is a part of the charm with amateur photos.