[johnforbes]

By the absurd argument Democrats are making, they themselves are attempting to obstruct Barr's probe into Dem corruption.

It is now very, very clear that:

1) Hillary broke 18 USC 793, but was let go with a fake investigation by corrupt Dems such as Strzok, Page, McCabe, etc.

2) Hillary's fake dossier was used to abuse FISA and wiretap Trump.

Dems attempted to stage a coup d'état.

[Clownkicker]

No one is trying to obstruct Barr, you lying sack of shit. He can do whatever he wants.

Why is made up stupid shit all conservatives ever have.

But why is johnforbes still criticizing the Trump Administrations glaring failures, but blaming Democrats for those failures to prosecute Hillary?

Why is johnforbes desperately trying to distract from Trump's other crimes with shit that even Trump refuses to pursue?

[johnforbes]

Come on, the entire Mueller probe was based on the fake dossier which Mueller's chief deputy apparently knew was fake BEFORE the probe commenced.

The best defense is a good offense, and ya gotta give Democrats credit for being dishonest enough to push the Mueller probe for two whole years knowing it was pure, complete bull.

Meanwhile, they all knew Hillary broke 18 USC 793, but they had to let her go because otherwise Trump would have won by even more.

It was an attempted coup -- the largest political scandal in U.S. history.

It involved Comey, Strzok, Page, Ohr, Ohr's wife, Fusion GPS, McCabe, Brennan and Clapper apparently helped, and surely Barry O knew all about it.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Huh?

[johnforbes]

ome on, the entire Mueller probe was based on the fake dossier which Mueller's chief deputy apparently knew was fake BEFORE the probe commenced.

My prior post was a model of lucidity, but I have rephrased it for crystal clarity.

The best defense is a good offense, and ya gotta give Democrats credit for being dishonest enough to push the Mueller probe for two whole years knowing it was pure, complete bull.

They went on offense and for 2 years delayed public recognition that they had attempted a coup in, and after, 2016.

Meanwhile, they all knew Hillary broke 18 USC 793, but they had to let her go because otherwise Trump would have won by even more.

It was an attempted coup -- the largest political scandal in U.S. history.

It involved Comey, Strzok, Page, Ohr, Ohr's wife, Fusion GPS, McCabe, Brennan and Clapper apparently helped, and surely Barry O knew all about it.

[Clownkicker]

It is encouraging to see johnforbes' ongoing contempt for the Trump Justice Department who have been shirking their responsibility to enforce the law for over two years.

But why johnny keeps repeatedly droning on with his string of lies is a mystery. Each time there seems to be one more lie added in the lot.
This time it's "Democrats credit for being dishonest enough to push the Mueller probe for two whole years" as if Democrats could touch Mueller or pressure him in any way.

And why is johnny still pretending the failure to indict Hillary has anything to do with Democrats? If Barr is failing to do his job as AG, then that's on Trump and the Republicans. Get mad, johnny, criticize the Trump Administrations incompetence and disrespect for the Constitution! And spare us your pointless nonsense.....please.

[johnforbes]

First, every president deserves his own DoJ.

JFK hired RFK as AG for that reason.

Second, until Mueller gave up after 2 years, and until Rosenstein left, Trump did not have his own DoJ.

More importantly, America didn't have a neutral "justice" system under Holder and Lynch, who both felt racism only worked in one direction, and both of whom saw the department as merely a political tool.

[Clownkicker]

But now you are vehemently claiming the Trump Justice Department isn't neutral either and are actually biased in favor of Hillary.

So why don't you get mad about that, johnny? Why keep trying to distract from Barr's incompetence and pro-Democrat bias?

[johnforbes]

I'd like to see a neutral DoJ.

Alas, Holder and Lynch were astoundingly biased in favor of Dems.

Barr is quite competent, and the only reason Dems are attacking him is to try to taint the jury in advance.

By the way, I don't think Barr is pro-Dem in his bias, but that was probably just a typo on your part.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, if Barr is refusing to prosecute a Democrat who clearly broke the law, what would you CALL it if not "pro-Democrat"?

What is it about this corrupt pro-Democrat Trump AG that you find so appealing?