The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Only 40% disapprove. Even 26% of those who voted for Hillary now approve of the job Trump is doing, 92% of those who voted for Trump plan to do so again. He has all time support among blacks and Hispanics which means he is winning them over. There is no way in hell he can be beat in 2020.

WOW it keeps getting better!

A new poll of Wall Street insiders shows that a vast majority expect President Donald Trump to win reelection in 2020. More than 70% of survey respondents told global investment bank RBC Capital Markets that they expect Trump to be reelected.

Lori Calvasina, RBC's head of U.S. equity strategy, wrote to clients. Sixty-seven percent "of our March 2019 survey respondents believe that Joe Biden is seen as the most acceptable Democratic candidate by the stock market for the White House. No other candidate got a significant number of votes."

The survey was conducted after special counsel Robert Mueller gave the results of his investigation to the Justice Department; 141 equity-focused institutional investors were polled.

Early polls for 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination are favoring Joe Biden," the strategist added. "Bernie Sanders comes in second place, by a 7 point spread relative to Biden, however, Sanders is seen by our Survey respondents as the second least acceptable Democratic candidate by the stock market."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is seen by a majority as the least acceptable Democratic candidate for the stock market.

Let me break this down for clown. Trump wins in 2020 if he runs, stock markets are fine and the economy continues to grow. If for some reason Trump decides not to run and if it looks like any Democrat besides Biden will win...SELL, SELL, SELL.

Got gold?

Tool, you have started several threads claiming Trump is a "shoe in"<-- :lol:

You claim that Trump CAN'T lose.

Now you ask if we've "Got gold?" In other words, you realize another Trump term is THAT dangerous and destabilizing to our economy.

Clown once again, I've failed to bring the conversation down to a level you can follow.

You posted at a level I don't get alright; a hypocritical and partisan level. I don't do that.

Then you want to weasel out of every prediction you made---again.

Trump is no longer a "shoe in"<-- :lol: apparently. Now it's a real contest to see who can trash the economy first.

I hate to break it to you, Tool, but Trump has the edge on that one.

"Clown" The only hypocrite on this board is you and Elk

Dumbfuck....

What fucknuttery has the right wing blogosphere whipped you into now?

MS-13
Brown people climbing over walls
Infanticide
Two Genders
Gays

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Elkin, stop the race-baiting.

People sneaking over the border are ILLEGAL, and that matters.

And, yes, there are gangs, and the members of said gangs are animals who commit horrible crimes.

Liberals ought to care about crime victims, but don't.

Trump on people asking for asylum: "These aren't people. These are animals."

Now who would say that? Hitler, David Duke???

:roll:

Elkin, stop being dishonest.

He was referring to gang members, and he was correct.

Johnnie...stop being so dishonest. It's just asinine. You interpreted Trump's statement as referring to gang members.

If Trump wanted to refer to gang members...then he would have easily said so.

Trump has thrown away the dog whistle and how he's using a fucking blow horn.

Elkin, stop being dishonest.

He was referring to gang members, and he was correct.

Anybody can look this up and realize the accuracy of my post.

Johnnie....stop being so dishonest.

You're just guessing and making up what Trump was referring to.

On a side note....thank the good Lawd that we elected some malevolent racist moron who just canned his homeland security chief because separating families and sticking babies into concentration camps was insufficiently cruel, and not the lady who was careless with three emails, because what a fucking nightmare that would have been.

elklindo69 wrote:Johnnie....stop being so dishonest.

You're just guessing and making up what Trump was referring to.

On a side note....thank the good Lawd that we elected some malevolent racist moron who just canned his homeland security chief because separating families and sticking babies into concentration camps was insufficiently cruel, and not the lady who was careless with three emails, because what a fucking nightmare that would have been.

Can you prove any of this Elk.. Do I need to go get the popcorn while we all wait

"He was referring to gang members, and he was correct.
Anybody can look this up and realize the accuracy of my post."-johnforbes

johnny, namandgulfdumbfuck clearly wants to know if you can you prove any of this.. Do I need to go get the popcorn while we all wait?

namandgulfdumbfuck is nothing if not fair in applying his criteria for truth equally to every poster here.
And since you made the first claims, namandgulfdumbfuck expects you to provide the first proof on this thread.

If what Johnnie claimed was true....then he wouldn't ask anybody to verify for him.

History will remember Nielsen as the person who stood by and pretended nothing was happening as babies were stuck into concentration camps. And as a consequence we have another Trump flunky who left as being unemployable and with her reputation in tatters.

Nicely done Ms. Nielsen!

Elkin, stop being dishonest.

He was referring to gang members, and he was correct.

Anybody can look this up and realize the accuracy of my post.

Elkin, stop being dishonest.

Elk wouldn't know honesty if it slapped him in his Cocksucker

If Johnnie was truly accurate then he would have come in flaming at 90 million miles an hour with the proof.

Anytime you need to say something along the lines of..."referring to" or "Trump meant" then you know Johnnie is just making it up.

Now we have Ilhan Omar taking heat because she called Stephen Miller a white nationalist. Come one people.....even white nationalists think that Stephen Miller is a white nationalist.........just saying.

Elkin, you would know more about "flaming" than the rest of us who aren't gay.

And you wouldn't need this info if you had even a modest awareness of the facts.

But, to be polite:

A CNN news anchor and three MSNBC guests spread the false impression on the air that President Donald Trump referred to immigrants as "animals" last week.

The confusion stemmed from an unverified Twitter user identified as Mark Elliott, who tweeted out a short clip of Trump Friday and accused him of referring to asylum seekers by the insulting moniker.

However, the clip was from May 2018, and Trump was responding to a question about the transnational street gang MS-13. Nevertheless, multiple news outlets and politicians ran with the idea he had referred to all immigrants as "animals" last year as well.

Despite the clip being old and well-known in political circles due to its litigation last year, dozens of politicians—including presidential candidates–journalists, and celebrities shared the tweet and expressed outrage over it.

It spilled over onto television, too, with CNN anchor Jim Sciutto asking a Republican guest Monday morning if Trump was helpful on border policy when "referring to immigrants as animals."

Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden said on MSNBC Friday night that "this afternoon" Trump had referred to people coming across the border as "animals." Former Democratic National Committee CEO Jess O'Connell told MSNBC on Saturday, "You saw just this week, he compared immigrants to animals."

Also on Saturday, liberal Daily Beast writer Jonathan Alter referred to Trump's comments "yesterday" as "truly shameful."

"He compared people going to the border to animals," Alter said. "Now anybody who has studied any history knows that when you start calling people animals, when you dehumanize them that way, that's when the killing begins."
Sciutto and MSNBC spokespersons did not respond to Free Beacon requests for comment on whether they would correct the record.

Now, Elkin, you know the facts and you will apologize because you have good character, won't you?

johnny, you DID notice your post says nothing whatsoever about what Trump MEANT by his recent statements.

You have yet to provide some evidence that Trump actually meant what you say he meant. Otherwise, elklindo's take on what he said is exactly as valid as yours: it's someone's opinion, and everyone has one.

Or are you saying your asshole is somehow 'better' than elklindo's? Is that what the Republican boys down at the truck stop told you?

johnny, you DID notice your post says nothing whatsoever about what Trump MEANT by his recent statements.

What recent statements? Elk saying he doesn't like what the President tells us nothing. By the way, Trump's approval record continues to sky rocket far above Obama's in his 3rd year.

Tool, you really need to look up the word "skyrocket".

It doesn't mean what you think it means. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Clownkicker wrote:Tool, you really need to look up the word "skyrocket".

It doesn't mean what you think it means. :lol: :lol: :lol:

What difference does it make.. Trumps numbers are way over what Ojackass was at the same time... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Obama's approval ratings at 27 months in were 45%.

Trump's approval rating 27 months in is 39%.

THAT's what difference it makes, dumbfuck. :lol: :lol: :lol:



Conservatard pop quiz, dumbfuck: which is higher? Trump's 39 or Obama's 45?

Clown, he was talking about drug gangs.

The context of a remark about drug gangs is, well, drug gangs.

I get that you oppose Trump and want open borders, but you don't get to simply spread the sort of lie that leftist nuts like Elkin are spreading.

johnny, we thank you for your assho... I mean, your partisan opinion.

Clownkicker wrote:johnny, we thank you for your assho... I mean, your partisan opinion.

Says the biggest ly9ing hypocrite on the planet

Sorry johnny, but apparently namandgulfdumbfuck doesn't thank you for your opinion.

Again this went over "Clowns" head. No wonder hes called "Stupid"

Notice namandgulfdumbfuck couldn't pass the conservatard pop quiz.

He simply doesn't know which is higher, Trump's 39% approval or Obama's 45% approval?

Don't be a fool, dumbfuck. Go to school. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Clownkicker wrote:Notice namandgulfdumbfuck couldn't pass the conservatard pop quiz.

He simply doesn't know which is higher, Trump's 39% approval or Obama's 45% approval?

Don't be a fool, dumbfuck. Go to school. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Again thanks for admitting you lied as usual

As of March 9, Trump and Obama are deadlocked at 44% at the same points in their presidencies. After almost an entire year of tracking at times well below Obama, Trump finally caught up to him on December 22, when they both polled at the same number, 44%. Since public perception of the two presidents matched up in late December, Trump and Obama have been trading leads. Obama's biggest lead over Trump in that period was 6 points (50 - 44) on January 31; Trump's widest lead was 7 points (50 - 43) on February 27. Their polling numbers have been within a point of each other multiple times since first syncing.

Clown just got schooled again!

Clown and Elk's problem is they are so used to their libtard crowds they hang with soaking up any rumor against Trump and making it "real". Then when they try and sell that bullshit to informed, intelligent people they get schooled and throw tissy fits.

Conservatives own the political forum dudes, accept it.

"Trumps numbers are way over what Ojackass was at the same time..."-dumbfuck

"As of March 9, Trump and Obama are deadlocked at 44%..."-dumbfuck's source
He shot himself in the foot and shot RealTool in the face with a single post. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Once again namandgulfdumbfuck makes a fool of Tool's claims (and his own claims) that Trump is more popular than Obama was at this point in his Presidency.

Once again both dimwits have been schooled, and they did it to each other. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Now, let's go to a real source that someone can actually read instead of their made up stupid shit:

Obama's approval rating March 7-13, 2011: 47%
https://news.gallup.com/poll/116479/bar ... roval.aspx

Trump's approval rating March 1-10, 2019: 39%
https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/pre ... trump.aspx
Trump's disapproval rating March 1-10, 2019: 57%
Once again proving RealTool lied about a "majority of voters now support Trump"

Both those dimwits just got schooled again!
Conservatives don't own ANYTHING on the political forum. Like Trump, they refuse to take responsibility for anything they say or do.

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... rack_apr10" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Clown gets schooled again. Notice he avoided polls that were taken after Mueller cleared him of Russian collusion, mine just came out today. Now clown will argue he thought we were talking about a while back not his current approval rating.

Let me explain this for Clown.

A talk about drug gangs is about drug gangs.

MS-13 members are animals -- the scum of the earth, and the crimes they commit are cowardly and disgusting.