The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has claimed for two years that he has seen an abundance of evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. Today the White House called upon Schiff to tell the public about the evidence he has that Mueller couldn't find and questioned why he didn't pass it on to Mueller.

Schiff be brought before Congress and forced to testify under oath concerning the evidence he has told the American public he has seen. If he has evidence the President colluded with Russia his position requires he disclose it.

Im wondering how Schiff and Elk have privilege to information no one else has. This kind of says a lot about the two..

Brennan said the same thing, and he called Trump's behavior "treasonous," didn't he?

And yet, there was absolutely no evidence at all of collusion.

Over two years, with a staff made up entirely of Democrats (many of whom donated to Hillary and Obama), with hundreds of subpoenas, thousands of interviews, and 13 foreign trips, Mueller found NOTHING.

It was all a distraction, and they all knew the dossier was fake and paid for by Hillary.

How could Brennan not know the dossier was political and fake? Why did he shop it around to Democrat Harry Reid?