Page 1 of 1
Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not willi
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 6:46 am
by namngulfvet
Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not willing to charge' her on key espionage statute: internal chart
An internal chart prepared by federal investigators working on the so-called "Midyear Exam" probe into Hillary Clinton's emails, exclusively reviewed by Fox News, contained the words "NOTE: DOJ not willing to charge this" next to a key statute on the mishandling of classified information. The notation appeared to contradict former FBI Director James Comey's repeated claims that his team made its decision that Clinton should not face criminal charges independently.
Fox News has confirmed the chart served as a critical tip that provided the basis for Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe's explosive questioning of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page last year, in which Page agreed with Ratcliffe's characterization that the DOJ had told the FBI that "you're not going to charge gross negligence." A transcript of Page's remarks was published Tuesday as part of a major document release by the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins.
The document, entitled "Espionage Act Charges - Retention/Mishandling," contained a list of several criminal statutes related to the mishandling of classified information, as well as a list of all the elements that prosecutors would need to prove in order to successfully prosecute a case.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/chart- ... ubG7_9mtUY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:51 am
by johnforbes
Anybody can read 18 USC 793 and see that Hillary broke it.
To avoid that conclusion, Strzok changed the language to "extreme carelessness," but he had to know that was dishonest.
It is NOT careless to set up your own private server to allow yourself to delete 33,000 emails under subpoena, as Hillary did.
It was intentional, and the intent was to destroy evidence she wanted to never be seen.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:04 am
by namngulfvet
New Lisa Page testimony reveals Loretta Lynch made decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton over emails
https://video.foxnews.com/v/60138067720 ... show-clips" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Talk about bias right Elk! Dont you think it should be justice for all
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 7:39 am
by johnforbes
If you've ever heard Lynch testify, she has mastered the art of using words to fill space and time while saying nothing.
You couldn't rely on her to honestly tell you what day it was.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:58 am
by sillydaddy
In not charging Hillary the DOJ also said her actions lacked "intent"..
I guess she was setting up the WiFi on her laptop and accidently created the private server...! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:07 am
by Clownkicker
"If you've ever heard Lynch testify, she has mastered the art of using words to fill space and time while saying nothing."-johnflubs
In other words, she sounds just like a johnforbes thread where he posts a bunch of comments but never expresses an actual point to his comments nor provides any evidence to back up his rambling comments?
Yes, it IS aggravating, johnny.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:26 am
by johnforbes
Thank you for the agreement with my post above.
However, they are significant differences.
She is about 4'10" tall and portly, and she simply will not tell the truth.
In my case, the truth is brutally clear and daily delivered.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:32 am
by Clownkicker
A hypothetical distinction without a difference given the fact you produce no more evidence to support your droning assertions than she does, so we have no more reason to believe you than we have to believe her.
And since you are systematically and partisanly hypocritical about everything, I actually have less reason to believe the hogwash coming out of your hand.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:53 am
by namngulfvet
Speaking of Hypocrites and look who shows up. the board puppet, liar and biggest hypocrite of all.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:04 pm
by Clownkicker
Yes, dimwit, I was the only one speaking of hypocrites and then YOU showed up, the board ignoramus.
You still don't understand how that works, do you, you moron. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:18 pm
by johnforbes
You should listen to Lynch's past testimony.
There are many examples online.
That gal wouldn't tell you what day it is so that you could rely on it.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:55 pm
by elklindo69
I wonder when Johnnie will be pivoting from the emails on the "insecure" server to DNA?
:lol:
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 3:40 pm
by johnforbes
Insecure, like unsecure, means easily broken into.
Elkin should thank us for improving his vocabulary, which is woefully inadequate.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 5:23 pm
by namngulfvet
Niceee to see our local liberal idiots ("Clown" and Elk) defending these criminals (Hillary and Lynch) again proving they could care less about their own security let alone anyone else's
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:10 pm
by elklindo69
johnforbes wrote:Insecure, like unsecure, means easily broken into.
Elkin should thank us for improving his vocabulary, which is woefully inadequate.
Third Wednesday: Insecure vs. Unsecure
It’s easy to make simple mistakes in word use. After all, in the English language so many words sound similar. However, the specific meaning of a word can completely change what we’re trying to express.
“County officials discovered over two hundred insecure voting machines only days before the election.”
Reading the above sentence, I got the mental image of a room full of voting machines whining that the crowds of people made them anxious about keeping an accurate tally of votes.
Insecure – not safe from danger; filled with anxieties, not confident, apprehensive; unreliable, not dependable.
Marlis’s demanding society-queen mother-in-law made her feel insecure no matter how appropriately the younger woman dressed.
Starting a new grade in a new school without the company of his buddies made Arnold feel insecure.
Unsecure – not made secure, not firmly in place; not guaranteed by collateral.
Only after he climbed atop the shelves and discovered they wobbled wildly did Roger realize they were unsecure.
Until you spin the dial on a closed Diebold safe, the contents you want to protect remain unsecure.
Here’s another look at Insecure and Unsecure.
Wrong:
The baseball game was an insecure meeting place for the police commissioner and the mob boss.
Any writer would be unsecure after reading the scathing review just published by the Piccolo Post.
Right:
It was evident that Marvin felt insecure about making the presentation to the company president.
Although he labored to prevent anyone without authority catching a glimpse of the classified documents, he left them unsecured on his desk when he fell asleep in the break room.
Being insecure about his capabilities placed Marvin in the unsecure position of pleading to keep his job after the debacle.
Need a memory trick to distinguish these words? If it’s all about the feeling, it’s “in” the person’s psyche.
Re: Hillary Clinton investigators were told Obama DOJ 'not w
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:15 am
by johnforbes
Insecure, like unsecure, means easily broken into.
Elkin should thank us for improving his vocabulary, which is woefully inadequate.