Page 1 of 1

Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government clos

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:01 pm
by namngulfvet
Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government closed forever’

On Thursday, House Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., indicated to reporters that she would rather keep the government shut down indefinitely than send a bill to President Trump’s desk that funds a border wall.

Asked why President Trump would sign a Democratic bill that doesn’t include wall funding, Pelosi replied, “Does he want to have government closed forever?”

this is on you traitor bitch
https://www.conservativereview.com/news ... XWgDObecAc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:03 pm
by Clownkicker
Did you see the video of the border patrol agent showing Trump a second tunnel under a section of border that actually has a Trump-style wall?

The border agent was trying to explain that they don't want a wall and if they get it, it won't stop anyone anyway.

If Trump had ever actually worked construction for a living, he would have heard of a thing called a "shovel".

And as all conservatives know, those Mexicans are really good with shovels.

https://madison.com/news/nation/governm ... 8516a.html

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:17 pm
by elklindo69
Rather than negotiate with democrats, at some point in time in the future Trump is going to “announce” his proposal to democrats because that’s what you do when you want to create a narcissistic shit-storm of a political theater instead of reopening the government...

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:39 pm
by johnforbes
Walls work really well.

They channel and guide human behavior, allowing more resources to be devoted to halting tunnels or ladders.

Demcrats know this is true, and that is why they lock their own cars and houses to keep unwanted folks out.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:47 pm
by Clownkicker
johnny, even the Great Wall of China didn't keep people out.

Why do you think the Great Masturbatory Wall of Trump would be any more successful?

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 7:39 am
by namngulfvet
Clownkicker wrote:Did you see the video of the border patrol agent showing Trump a second tunnel under a section of border that actually has a Trump-style wall?

The border agent was trying to explain that they don't want a wall and if they get it, it won't stop anyone anyway.

If Trump had ever actually worked construction for a living, he would have heard of a thing called a "shovel".

And as all conservatives know, those Mexicans are really good with shovels.

https://madison.com/news/nation/governm ... 8516a.html
Thats funny clown. Every agent I have talked to wants the wall. maybe you need to get out of your mommies basement and go take a look at our border. Maybe then you would see hundreds of illegals crossing over in the dead of night.

I have to laugh at the LA teachers unions who went on strike. They whined about wages and classes being way to big. yet these are the same morons who keep voting all these liberals in. You know the liberals who keep allowing Illegals to cross over then give them sanctuary.. Allow their kids to go to our schools the same group who gets free education on the backs of taxpayers. the same freeloading band of illegals who are overcrowding the LA schools.. When are you liberals going to wake up.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:43 am
by snakeoil
But it's okay for the Baby President to throw a tantrum and harm people if you doesn't get his way. As much as I hate to admit it, Pelosi is right. We cannot allow this President and future Presidents to shut down the government to force their agenda on Congress. Suppose some future President banned all political parties except his and declared himself President-For-Life.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:55 am
by Clownkicker
"Every agent I have talked to wants the wall."-namandgulfdumbfuck

That's funny, dumbfuck. You haven't actually talked to any agents, but I showed you a video of an actual border agent explaining to Trump that people simply dig under a wall. [Or climb over it]

Me: actual agent
You: jack shit :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:00 am
by namngulfvet
Clownkicker wrote:"Every agent I have talked to wants the wall."-namandgulfdumbfuck

That's funny, dumbfuck. You haven't actually talked to any agents, but I showed you a video of an actual border agent explaining to Trump that people simply dig under a wall. [Or climb over it]

Me: actual agent
You: jack shit :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
that doesnt mean we dont need a wall. But thanks for admitting you dont get it.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:01 am
by namngulfvet
snakeoil wrote:But it's okay for the Baby President to throw a tantrum and harm people if you doesn't get his way. As much as I hate to admit it, Pelosi is right. We cannot allow this President and future Presidents to shut down the government to force their agenda on Congress. Suppose some future President banned all political parties except his and declared himself President-For-Life.
Thanks for admitting your ignorant. Its Peliosi whos ignoring the security of America not Trump turd brain

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:44 am
by Clownkicker
"that doesnt mean we dont need a wall."-namandgufldumbfuck

That's EXACTLY what it means, you moron.

But thanks for admitting you don't get it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:53 am
by namngulfvet
Clownkicker wrote:"that doesnt mean we dont need a wall."-namandgufldumbfuck

That's EXACTLY what it means, you moron.

But thanks for admitting you don't get it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
thanks for admitting your socialist smuck who hate America.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:01 am
by sillydaddy
The world is going to end in 12 years anyway.... :o

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:22 am
by johnforbes
Yes, we must all focus on enjoying the 12 years we have.

That said, I must note that Clown and Elkin lock their cars and houses to keep out unwanted people.

Those locks guide and channel human behavior, but they don't mean it is impossible for some criminal to break into their cars or houses.

Walls work, and that is what the Left is afraid of.

Even Steny Hoyer admitted that the existing walls work and he wouldn't want to take them down.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:30 am
by Clownkicker
johnny, saying "walls work" on a two mile stretch of densely populated city border somewhere is not the same thing as saying a wall on two thousand miles of desert border will make us one bit more secure. (By the way, those city borders are routinely tunneled also.)

Unsurprisingly, johnforbes is here supporting Trump spending like a drunken sailor on more white elephants.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:01 pm
by johnforbes
Walls work, and that is very well known, and that's why the Clinton and Obama White House, and their personal homes, have walls.

Do various means of security work better or worse depending upon extrinsic conditions? Sure.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 5:55 pm
by elklindo69
Walls are not foolproof, they are a deterrent.

Since barriers may be effective in deterring intruders from trespassing on someone's property, John presumes that this will extrapolate to barriers built in the middle of the desert.

Will the "barriers" proposed by Trump which will be built in the middle of the desert be effective? Who knows? That's how come nobody bothered to construct them in the middle of no where to begin with in the first place. Because the cost to build and maintain the structure was not worth the benefit....

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:40 am
by namngulfvet
elklindo69 wrote:Walls are not foolproof, they are a deterrent.

Since barriers may be effective in deterring intruders from trespassing on someone's property, John presumes that this will extrapolate to barriers built in the middle of the desert.

Will the "barriers" proposed by Trump which will be built in the middle of the desert be effective? Who knows? That's how come nobody bothered to construct them in the middle of no where to begin with in the first place. Because the cost to build and maintain the structure was not worth the benefit....
Well there you have it folks. The wall isnt even worth a life. Not one life. So what if that dude out in the desert dies out there thinking he can cross over to the USA. So what if he dies of thirst, a broken leg, beat up and robbed. Its only a Mexican right Elk.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 8:30 am
by Clownkicker
^^^^^^ namandgulf is channeling RealTool and pretending he's elklindo. :lol:

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:09 am
by sillydaddy
The Demos object to the Wall...but don't offer an alternative, other than they want

"comprehensive immigration reform" ... What the fuck does that mean...?
Law enforcement? Legislation?..What?
What ever it is..I bet it will cost more than $ 5 Billion..! :o

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:39 am
by johnforbes
The Dem "solution" is to give double the 5 billion to Honduras and 5 billion more to Guatemala to improve things there and hope they don't send more caravans.

Really, Dems are that stupid, and if given that money will just end up in the Panama bank accounts of dictators and crooks.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:37 pm
by elklindo69
Well Trump is proposing to build a wall in the middle of the desert where nobody will cross anyway. And if they do build it, well someone who is crazy enough to venture out into the desert will climb over or dig under and nobody will notice anyway.

As Trump said it himself....it's only 5 billion dollars.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:49 am
by namngulfvet
I see where Peloisi over the past few years has spent over $2.5 million of taxpayers dollars on her personal travel expensive s. Why is she spending taxpayers dollars and not her own. All hail the queen dicktator

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 8:15 am
by johnforbes
As Professor Ocasio-Cortez recently proclaimed, we have but 12 years remaining.

Clown and Elkin lock their cars and houses to keep out unwanted people.

Those locks guide and channel human behavior, but they don't mean it is impossible for some criminal to break into their cars or houses.

Walls work, and that is what the Left is afraid of.

Even Steny Hoyer admitted that the existing walls work and he wouldn't want to take them down.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 8:41 am
by namngulfvet
johnforbes wrote:As Professor Ocasio-Cortez recently proclaimed, we have but 12 years remaining.

Clown and Elkin lock their cars and houses to keep out unwanted people.

Those locks guide and channel human behavior, but they don't mean it is impossible for some criminal to break into their cars or houses.

Walls work, and that is what the Left is afraid of.

Even Steny Hoyer admitted that the existing walls work and he wouldn't want to take them down.
And if someone did break in they (Clown and Elk) would be first to call the first responders they hate with a passion to whine about someone breaking in. yet its ok for illegals to break into the country and they welcome them with open arms and treat them like gold over our own citizens and homeless

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:54 am
by Clownkicker
"...(Clown and Elk) would be first to call the first responders they hate with a passion..."-namandgulfdumbfuck

What are you talking about, dumbfuck? YOU are the one who hates the socialist First Responders, not me. You hate everything socialist.

Unlike you, I'm all for them.

And more than that, I am perfectly happy to pay taxes to have them take care of those who don't pay taxes.

You know, leaches on the system like you, dumbfuck.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:23 am
by johnforbes
Leech (yes, a typo

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:12 pm
by elklindo69
The Deplorables: A wall is racist? HUH WUT...how can a wall be racist?

Answer: Well....in the same way those white hoods and robes are racist, Pepe le Frog.... next question.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2019 6:15 pm
by johnforbes
The lock on Elkin's car door is racist.

Elkin is deplorable for locking the front door of his house.

Re: Pelosi: No wall funding, even if that means ‘government

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2019 7:29 pm
by elklindo69
This whole border wall fiasco reminds me of a scene from the old school ghost buster movie when the lady gets possessed by the demon

There is no border crisis. There is only Zuul!!!

:lol: