Page 1 of 1
Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:44 pm
by RealJustme
Trump said if he does, I'll fire him.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:30 pm
by johnforbes
Kagan and Sotomayor both needed to recuse on Obamacare, but of course Dems don't recuse themselves.
If Sessions was going to, he should then have resigned.
Every president deserves his own AG, and certainly Dems had very partisan ones like Holder and Lynch who turned blind justice into partisan "justice."
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:09 pm
by RealJustme
WOW, this will trigger libtards.
The White House announced that Whitaker will now oversee the Russia probe instead of Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, who still remains in place. In a statement Wednesday evening, Whitaker said he is “committed to leading a fair Department with the highest ethical standards, that upholds the rule of law, and seeks justice for all Americans, I will not recuse myself from my responsibilities as Acting Attorney General. I have assumed oversight of the Russia probe immediately.”
In a 2017 CNN op-ed, Whitaker wrote that he thought Mueller’s investigation was going too far. “Mueller has come up to a red line in the Russia 2016 election-meddling investigation that he is dangerously close to crossing,” he wrote, adding that if the special counsel doesn’t back off, the probe would “eventually start to look like a political fishing expedition.”
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:09 pm
by sillydaddy
Every president deserves his own AG, and certainly Dems had very partisan ones like Holder and Lynch who turned blind justice into partisan "justice."
JFK appointed his own brother as AG.... because he wanted someone loyal to him... :o
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:44 pm
by RealJustme
Matthew Whitaker has already stepped up to the plate. He announced that not only will he now control Mueller's investigation, which is his job, he will determine what if anything is released to the public and HE will make any decisions if there were any criminal violations once he receives the investigation. He pointed out "Mueller's only job is to conduct the investigation and turn it over to me, I will determine what should be done with the findings."
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:50 pm
by elklindo69
So Trump's replacing Sessions with a younger and more flaming racist?
:lol:
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:36 pm
by RealJustme
Be afraid Elk, be very afraid.
Watch for Whitaker to soon bring corruption charges against Mueller and those involved in the abuses of government agencies in an attempt to oust a sitting President. Jim Acosta won't be around to question the White House about it.
Whitaker has already announced he will be releasing the information in the FISA warrants so the public knows exactly what they were based upon.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:42 am
by johnforbes
Elkin should avoid using the word "flaming" because it describes his own persona.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:42 pm
by elklindo69
RealJustme wrote:Be afraid Elk, be very afraid.
Watch for Whitaker to soon bring corruption charges against Mueller and those involved in the abuses of government agencies in an attempt to oust a sitting President. Jim Acosta won't be around to question the White House about it.
Whitaker has already announced he will be releasing the information in the FISA warrants so the public knows exactly what they were based upon.
It's safe to say that Trump fears the caravan of democrats headed to the House of Representatives

Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:47 am
by johnforbes
Not where they are making moronic remarks about presidential capacity to appoint an AG, as Gillibrand and Manchin both foolishly have.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:32 pm
by elklindo69
I hear that Trump is claiming that he has no idea who this Whitaker is???
LMFAO!
:lol:
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:03 am
by johnforbes
Every president deserves to have his own AG.
Holder and Lynch were race-baiters who had zero concept of equal, neutral justice, and they never recused themselves.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:31 pm
by elklindo69
I hear that the FBI is investigating Whitaker.
It seems that everybody who is in Trump's orbit is either:
1. Under investigation
2. Indicted
3. Convicted
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:56 am
by johnforbes
Every president deserves to have his own AG.
Holder and Lynch were race-baiters who had zero concept of equal, neutral justice, and they never recused themselves.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 8:06 am
by Clownkicker
But they weren't under investigation, idicted, or convicted, were they johnny.
Yes, Trump deserves to have his own AG. One who is of the same moral and ethical caliber as he is.
Who better than someone under investigation like the rest of the Trump crowd. If Whitaker WASN'T under investigation, Trump wouldn't even consider him to be crooked enough to run his Justice Department.
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:06 am
by sillydaddy
The way I see it, Mueller just met his match...
So desperate are the Demos they are now seriously talking about introducing
a bill to protect one man...Mueller...! Can you say,"Unconstitutional "...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Democrats call on Matthew G. Whitaker to recuse himself
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:42 pm
by johnforbes
Mueller is conducted a probe, but he is also a witness in this.
Also, isn't he pals with Comey?
His conflicts are legion.
And, if he wanted to be fair, why did he hire 17 partisan Dems?