Page 1 of 1
Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:16 pm
by johnforbes
Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party.
Re the Yale student, no other student has confirmed the tale. Even the NY Times declined to run the story because it could not be confirmed. The writer at the New Yorker worked also at Fusion GPS, which cobbled together the fake dossier Hillary paid for. Ronan Farrow added his name to make the story look credible, but there simply is nothing to bolster it.
Evidence against Kavanaugh?
Nada.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 4:44 pm
by elklindo69
Why did Kavanaugh lie about being a virgin?
If he lied about that, why wouldn't he lie about other things?
Maybe he lied and told his wife that he was a virgin when they met, and he’s lying to save his marriage.
Blackout Brett is a known liar with BIG reasons to lie will always lie.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 5:50 pm
by johnforbes
Elkin, calm down a second and ask yourself why there is no evidence.
Have you ever read "The Crucible" by leftist Arthur Miller?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:03 pm
by RealJustme
Why did Kavanaugh lie about being a virgin?
Why do you think he lied about being a virgin in high school? Are you claiming you had sex with him in high school? :?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:02 am
by namngulfvet
Republicans have brought in a Female sex abuse expert to talk to Ford.. How ever Ford is still stalling and the second so called witness is refusing to testify.....A vote will be held on Friday.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:38 am
by johnforbes
Elkin has finally gone completely nuts.
Unless he is now claiming to have had a gay affair with him, in which case he should testify before the Senate.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:03 pm
by elklindo69
I would think that if I were innocent of all charges, I would fucking demand a full FBI investigation to clear my name but then again I'm not a lying blackout drunk accused rapist whose hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt mysteriously disappeared... so what would I know?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:38 pm
by sillydaddy
Elk...but you are a poor clueless fuck....and there's' plenty evidence of that...! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:04 pm
by namngulfvet
elklindo69 wrote:I would think that if I were innocent of all charges, I would fucking demand a full FBI investigation to clear my name but then again I'm not a lying blackout drunk accused rapist whose hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt mysteriously disappeared... so what would I know?
Tell us Eldoofus what evidence do you have of a federal crime that was committed? Give us the facts and only facts
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:14 pm
by johnforbes
In the case of C Thomas and Anita Hill, they were both federal employees and so the FBI looked.
Here, the FBI could do nothing about the evidence-free allegations from 36 years ago.
Besides, it is hilarious that Dems now love the FBI given its history and their history
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:19 pm
by Clownkicker
What's hilarious is that johnforbes is so dimwitted he doesn't understand that it's Trump and conservatives who regularly and loudly hold the FBI in contempt.
Liberals are just fine with them. We don't hate America and law enforcement like you partisan scumbags do.
I wonder what you are all so afraid of? Why does the truth scare you so much?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:23 pm
by elklindo69
Thank God we elected the man who thinks an extreme far right political operative, serial sexual abuser, rapist, and blackout drunk is exactly who we need on the supreme court, and not the woman who was careless with three emails...
OH...Good Lawd we really dodged a fucking bullet right there!
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:08 pm
by johnforbes
Elkin, you simply can't be as dumb as Gillibrand.
She came to power in a mostly white district, and she used to favor deporting illegal aliens, and she has hugged Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton in photos.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:17 pm
by elklindo69
John...you must be old enough now to remember when middle of the road Republicans were more or less decent folks who thought differently about government policies, and not a bunch of flaming clusterfuck of racists, white supremacists, child molesters, and blackout drunk gang raping prep school boys...
:roll:
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 6:19 am
by namngulfvet
elklindo69 wrote:Thank God we elected the man who thinks an extreme far right political operative, serial sexual abuser, rapist, and blackout drunk is exactly who we need on the supreme court, and not the woman who was careless with three emails...
OH...Good Lawd we really dodged a fucking bullet right there!
What proof do you have of any of this
ELKDOOFUS?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:46 am
by Clownkicker
"What proof do you have of any of this YOUR LORDSHIP?-namandgulfdumbfuck
The proof is Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Turn on the news, dimwit. It's right there. That's all they have been talking about for a week.
Try to keep up.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:06 am
by namngulfvet
Clownkicker wrote:"What proof do you have of any of this YOUR LORDSHIP?-namandgulfdumbfuck
The proof is Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Turn on the news, dimwit. It's right there. That's all they have been talking about for a week.
Try to keep up.
OMG Trump nominated Davanaugh to the Supreme Court... Meanwhile you Liberal Clowns make tons of worthless accusations with no substantial evidences to back it up... Now either put up or shut up...
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:12 am
by johnforbes
Elkin, your post above depicts your own "thinking" in cartoonish terms.
Trump wants secure borders; that doesn't make him a racist, and your assertions to the contrary are moronic.
Gillibrand is a lawyer, isn't she? She knows very well that innocence is the base presumption, not guilt, but she panders to dumb Democrats.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:53 am
by Clownkicker
johnny, your post above depicts your own "thinking" in cartoonish terms.
Trump can want secure borders and also be a racist; the two are not mutually exclusive, and your unsupported assertions to the contrary are moronic.
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:08 am
by namngulfvet
Im wondering how many nights Elk The Doofus and Clown the Asshole Licker go to bed and leave their doors open..
Im betting never...Yet the brain washed twits expect a nation to leave their doors open to anyone who wishes to cross over
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:54 pm
by elklindo69
Yeah Dumbfuck...
Yes please tell me more about this "I'm innocent! don't ask the FBI! don't ask my best friend!" strategy because it sounds like a clear winner to me...
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:46 am
by johnforbes
Elkin, you should stop and think for a second.
Set aside political beliefs.
You have been going around calling a guy a rapist with zero proof.
Surely you are better than that?
Re: Summarizing the Evidence
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:52 am
by namngulfvet
elklindo69 wrote:Yeah Dumbfuck...
Yes please tell me more about this "I'm innocent! don't ask the FBI! don't ask my best friend!" strategy because it sounds like a clear winner to me...
BAAAA BAAAAA BAAAAA says the sheep Elkdoofus BAAAA BAAAAA